Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

2019 club rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
hawkesbay
215 Posts 12 Posters 13.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    HBT article about the weekend's club rugby:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503460&objectid=12222273

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Number 10N Offline
      Number 10N Offline
      Number 10
      wrote on last edited by
      #67

      Watched Havelock North v Hastings RS.

      Hastings won 27-20, scoreline is reasonably close only because Havelock scored a converted try in the final minute.

      Hastings had a bigger forward pack, and won two tightheads just by pushing Havelock off the ball. To be fair, Hastings had an all-Magpies front row in Jason Long, Jacob Devery and Josiah Tavita-Metcalfe ... and Havelock didn't.

      Mason Emerson was there but did not play, Devan Flanders was there but did not play, and Kianu Kereru-Symes was there because MAC apparently defaulted to NOB Marist.

      The Hastings centre (Neria Fomai?) scored the first two tries for Hastings, and made a couple of other breaks that weren't finished off. He was certainly the biggest guy in either backline.

      Goalkicking was poor - Hastings scored five tries and converted one, Havelock scored three tries and converted one.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • HigginsH Offline
        HigginsH Offline
        Higgins
        wrote on last edited by
        #68

        Come on Number10, can't you let me in on how much Pirates got beaten by.

        Number 10N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • HigginsH Higgins

          Come on Number10, can't you let me in on how much Pirates got beaten by.

          Number 10N Offline
          Number 10N Offline
          Number 10
          wrote on last edited by
          #69

          @Higgins Tech defeated Pirates 25-17.

          Smashed 'em, bro!

          HigginsH Magpie_in_ausM 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          • Number 10N Number 10

            @Higgins Tech defeated Pirates 25-17.

            Smashed 'em, bro!

            HigginsH Offline
            HigginsH Offline
            Higgins
            wrote on last edited by Higgins
            #70

            @Number-10 :smiling_face_with_open_mouth: That's good news. Not a lot of love for Colenso Pirates after they tipped the Texans over with a runaway converted try late in the game last time I was home toward the end of the 2018 Maddison Trophy round.

            I'm a bit worried about tomorrow down here as we take on the table leaders away from home and with three (well four if you count Vaea Fifita but we will probably be very lucky if we ever get to see him in an Axeman jersey again) of our players away up in Japan with the Huricanes teams so are only anticipating a win narrow win this week!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • StargazerS Offline
              StargazerS Offline
              Stargazer
              wrote on last edited by Stargazer
              #71

              Some crazy scores in the lower grades.

              bb565728-80ec-451e-ad91-a9a704600569-image.png

              .

              Nash Cup Points scorers:

              Hastings Rugby and Sports 27 (T Vaiusu, G Kautai, N Fomai, A Vuki, J Scales tries; Vaiusu con)
              Havelock North 20 (C Harmer, T Hape, S Tuitufu tries; M Hill pen, con).
              HT: 17-3.

              Taradale 48 (I Mapu 4, J McPherson, A Tuck, M Eden tries; B Truesdale 5 cons, pen),
              Clive 7 (P Bassett try; E Collins con).
              HT: 27-7.

              Central 27 (T Taylor, T Fogarty, K Drury-Hawkins, M Konia, K Lepelaars tries; Drury-Hawkins con)
              Tamatea 7 (P Kireka try; H Solomon con).
              HT: 17-0.

              Napier Technical 25 (M Fox, J Faia, penalty try tries; L Shaw con, 2 pens)
              Napier Pirate Rugby and Sports 17 (M Murtha, L Odumessi tries; Z Clarke, G Tryon cons; Tryon pen).
              HT: 10-7.

              Napier Old Boys Marist beat MAC by default.

              .

              Tony Lamborn is apparently back from the USA; he played for Havelock North.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Number 10N Offline
                Number 10N Offline
                Number 10
                wrote on last edited by
                #72

                Yep, Tony Lamborn played the whole 80 for Havelock Nth.

                Could only play for Hawke's Bay in 2019 if he misses World Cup selection for USA.

                StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Number 10N Number 10

                  Yep, Tony Lamborn played the whole 80 for Havelock Nth.

                  Could only play for Hawke's Bay in 2019 if he misses World Cup selection for USA.

                  StargazerS Offline
                  StargazerS Offline
                  Stargazer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #73

                  @Number-10 Depending on whether Kaifa is still contracted, Lamborn will have to compete with him and Brighouse for a spot in the squad. I assume Brighouse will be the one to miss out.

                  Can't see Lamborn play at 6 though.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Number 10N Number 10

                    @Higgins Tech defeated Pirates 25-17.

                    Smashed 'em, bro!

                    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                    Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                    Magpie_in_aus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #74

                    @Number-10 said in 2019 club rugby:

                    @Higgins Tech defeated Pirates 25-17.

                    Smashed 'em, bro!

                    Up the mighty Phoenix! Bumpy season so far. Peaking for round 2...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Number 10N Offline
                      Number 10N Offline
                      Number 10
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #75

                      Went to Tareha Reserve to watch unbeaten Taradale in the top of the table match v Hastings RS.

                      Two evenly matched teams, and probably the teams with the two biggest forward packs in the comp.

                      Taradale won 29-15, it was 15-15 midway through the second half, then the Hastings RS rserve hooker got a yellow card, and Taradale scored two converted tries in the time he was in the bin.

                      Magpies WTG member Jacob Devery went off injured after just 15 minutes.

                      Just for Higgins: Tech have made it three wins in a row beating Central 43-21, after losing their first five matches ... Indian bookmakers?

                      HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Number 10N Number 10

                        Went to Tareha Reserve to watch unbeaten Taradale in the top of the table match v Hastings RS.

                        Two evenly matched teams, and probably the teams with the two biggest forward packs in the comp.

                        Taradale won 29-15, it was 15-15 midway through the second half, then the Hastings RS rserve hooker got a yellow card, and Taradale scored two converted tries in the time he was in the bin.

                        Magpies WTG member Jacob Devery went off injured after just 15 minutes.

                        Just for Higgins: Tech have made it three wins in a row beating Central 43-21, after losing their first five matches ... Indian bookmakers?

                        HigginsH Offline
                        HigginsH Offline
                        Higgins
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #76

                        @Number-10 said in 2019 club rugby:

                        Just for Higgins: Tech have made it three wins in a row beating Central 43-21, after > losing their first five matches ... Indian bookmakers?

                        🙂

                        To be fair my guys have had the most difficult draw possible with the opposition in the first four games being pretty much the four teams you expect to be in the Maddison Trophy Semifinals later this year. Maybe we deliberately tanked a few games to influence the bookmakers into offering attractive odds in future games. Anyway we must now have got our points differential down to less than 150 now!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #77

                          Copied from Twitter: all results from 27 April:

                          18560dcf-8484-418b-bb86-7a7a3a185ea0-image.png

                          .

                          All Premiers point scorers:

                          Taradale 29 (B Truesdale, N Sanft, L Maulolo, O Sapsford tries; Truesdale 3 con, pen)
                          Hastings Rugby and Sports 15 (N Fomai, A Vuki tries; T Vaiusu pen, con).
                          HT: Hastings 15-12.

                          Napier Old Boys Marist 48 (J Nelson-Murray 2, D Sharplin 2, Z Donaldson, Z Gregory, L Edwards, L Moleilli tries; Edwards 4 con)
                          Havelock North 38 (A Tuitavake 2, T Hape, J Paewai, T Lamborn tries; M Hill 5 con, pen).
                          HT: 22-17.

                          MAC 32 (P Latu 2, C Hokianga, H Waerea, P Faamoe tries; T Iosefo 2 con, pen)
                          Tamatea 32 (J Harris 2, H Solomon, L McClutchie tries; McClutchie 3 con, 2 pens).
                          HT: 20-17.

                          Napier Pirate Rugby and Sports 23 (K Te Amo, R Hubbard tries; Z Clarke 3 pens, 2 con)
                          Clive 15 (J Kaifa 2, J Fuimaono tries).
                          HT: 20-10.

                          Napier Technical 43 (M Fox 3, M Braidwood, P Manuel, M Lealaisalanoa, J Faia tries; L Shaw 4 con)
                          Central 21 (T Parsons 2, T Tayor tries; B Hardwidge 3 con).
                          HT: Central 14-12.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • HigginsH Offline
                            HigginsH Offline
                            Higgins
                            wrote on last edited by Higgins
                            #78

                            https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/hawkes-bay-today/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503460&objectid=12225562

                            Does anyone know the reasoning behind the transfer of a couple of MAC players to Tech mentioned midway through this article? Surprisingly I would be a little disappointed to read this if my guys actively poached these players as I know just how hard it is for clubs to keep existing players without players up and leaving. Even harder to accept players leaving clubs that appear to be doing a lot of good work in the community and are working hard to improve things on the field.

                            Please be careful in the wording of your replies please as sometimes things are best left unsaid.

                            StargazerS NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • HigginsH Higgins

                              https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/hawkes-bay-today/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503460&objectid=12225562

                              Does anyone know the reasoning behind the transfer of a couple of MAC players to Tech mentioned midway through this article? Surprisingly I would be a little disappointed to read this if my guys actively poached these players as I know just how hard it is for clubs to keep existing players without players up and leaving. Even harder to accept players leaving clubs that appear to be doing a lot of good work in the community and are working hard to improve things on the field.

                              Please be careful in the wording of your replies please as sometimes things are best left unsaid.

                              StargazerS Offline
                              StargazerS Offline
                              Stargazer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #79

                              @Higgins Sorry, I have no idea. I must admit that my eyes were stopping at this: "former North Harbour-based halfback-first five-eighth combination" when I first read that article. I was wondering whether these players were asked to come here to try getting a spot in the Magpies. But they didn't make the Magpies WTG, so I assume that's not the case.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • HigginsH Higgins

                                https://www.nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-today/hawkes-bay-today/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=1503460&objectid=12225562

                                Does anyone know the reasoning behind the transfer of a couple of MAC players to Tech mentioned midway through this article? Surprisingly I would be a little disappointed to read this if my guys actively poached these players as I know just how hard it is for clubs to keep existing players without players up and leaving. Even harder to accept players leaving clubs that appear to be doing a lot of good work in the community and are working hard to improve things on the field.

                                Please be careful in the wording of your replies please as sometimes things are best left unsaid.

                                NepiaN Online
                                NepiaN Online
                                Nepia
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #80

                                @Higgins Did they transfer mid season? The HBRU shouldn't be letting that happen if that's the case.

                                StargazerS Number 10N 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • NepiaN Nepia

                                  @Higgins Did they transfer mid season? The HBRU shouldn't be letting that happen if that's the case.

                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  Stargazer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #81

                                  @Nepia I'm not against it if it is to prevent clubs from defaulting due to lack of players (if the initial club of these players has enough players). I don't know whether this is the case, though.

                                  NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • StargazerS Stargazer

                                    @Nepia I'm not against it if it is to prevent clubs from defaulting due to lack of players (if the initial club of these players has enough players). I don't know whether this is the case, though.

                                    NepiaN Online
                                    NepiaN Online
                                    Nepia
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #82

                                    @Stargazer said in 2019 club rugby:

                                    @Nepia I'm not against it if it is to prevent clubs from defaulting due to lack of players (if the initial club of these players has enough players). I don't know whether this is the case, though.

                                    I think normally MAC would be more in danger of defaulting due to lack of players than Tech?

                                    StargazerS Stockcar86S 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • NepiaN Nepia

                                      @Stargazer said in 2019 club rugby:

                                      @Nepia I'm not against it if it is to prevent clubs from defaulting due to lack of players (if the initial club of these players has enough players). I don't know whether this is the case, though.

                                      I think normally MAC would be more in danger of defaulting due to lack of players than Tech?

                                      StargazerS Offline
                                      StargazerS Offline
                                      Stargazer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #83

                                      @Nepia Don't know. That could depend on injuries.

                                      NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • StargazerS Stargazer

                                        @Nepia Don't know. That could depend on injuries.

                                        NepiaN Online
                                        NepiaN Online
                                        Nepia
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #84

                                        @Stargazer said in 2019 club rugby:

                                        @Nepia Don't know. That could depend on injuries.

                                        :face_with_tears_of_joy: Lets not BS it, the big city Napier club Tech are always a much stronger club than the perennially struggling Flaxmere based MAC.

                                        HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • NepiaN Nepia

                                          @Stargazer said in 2019 club rugby:

                                          @Nepia I'm not against it if it is to prevent clubs from defaulting due to lack of players (if the initial club of these players has enough players). I don't know whether this is the case, though.

                                          I think normally MAC would be more in danger of defaulting due to lack of players than Tech?

                                          Stockcar86S Offline
                                          Stockcar86S Offline
                                          Stockcar86
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #85

                                          @Nepia said in 2019 club rugby:

                                          @Stargazer said in 2019 club rugby:

                                          @Nepia I'm not against it if it is to prevent clubs from defaulting due to lack of players (if the initial club of these players has enough players). I don't know whether this is the case, though.

                                          I think normally MAC would be more in danger of defaulting due to lack of players than Tech?

                                          MAC did default 2 weeks ago

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search