Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcenglandargentina
320 Posts 45 Posters 6.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MrDenmoreM MrDenmore

    @booboo Well it is predetermined if a random decision of a referee decides the game. If you want sport for its own sake go to the ground on a Saturday and watch the amateurs.

    boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #275

    @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

    @booboo Well it is predetermined if a random decision of a referee decides the game. If you want sport for its own sake go to the ground on a Saturday and watch the amateurs.

    Yeah. Never watched amateurs and expected them to play within the laws ... or even played amateur footy (or St Peters under 15) and played within the laws.

    At this level you expect the elite level athletes to know the laws and play within them.

    Sorry to disavow you of your perceptions...

    MrDenmoreM 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • pukunuiP pukunui

      You will never convince me that the current obsession with handing out red cards is a good thing.
      They have shifted their interpretation of dangerous play, and how it should be dealt with, a long way from where it used to be. But they haven’t changed the card system. It is no longer fit for purpose.
      Add in the inconsistency they are applying it with and it is a complete fucking mess.

      Straight red cards should be reserved for the worst of the worst. ie. biting, kicking, eye gouging, punching, stomping on a head and deliberate or extremely dangerous foul play eg. A stiff arm to the head.

      Tackles that are part of the game but have just been poorly executed in the heat of the game should be dealt with differently. There is absolutely no reason another tier of card allowing for a replacement player after 10min and harsher suspensions wouldn’t work.
      Or hey you could even start by not reducing every single ban by 50% because someone dressed nicely for the hearing.

      I would be very interested in seeing the stats for how often a team has gone on to win after copping a red card before 60 mins. It is so often a death sentence for the contest.

      By the way, im not commenting on the red card in this game. Im not watching it because i refused to pay money to watch a RWC which was so clearly going to be tainted by bullshit cards and inconsistent application of the laws.

      MrDenmoreM Offline
      MrDenmoreM Offline
      MrDenmore
      wrote on last edited by
      #276

      @pukunui Agree totally. Red cards should be reserved for deliberate foul play. But too often now, we’re seeing them handed out indiscriminately over inches-level judgements pertaining to high tackles. It’s buggered the game. It’s destroyed the spectacle. It’s left the public watching with their hearts in their throats worrying about the height of every tackle instead of appreciating the play in itself.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • MrDenmoreM MrDenmore

        @booboo Well it is predetermined if a random decision of a referee decides the game. If you want sport for its own sake go to the ground on a Saturday and watch the amateurs.

        boobooB Offline
        boobooB Offline
        booboo
        wrote on last edited by booboo
        #277

        @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

        @booboo Well it is predetermined if a random decision of a referee decides the game. If you want sport for its own sake go to the ground on a Saturday and watch the amateurs.

        Firstly, you've edited your post.

        Secondly, neither Owens nor World Rugby predetermined the foul play by Lavinini.

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • boobooB booboo

          @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

          @booboo Well it is predetermined if a random decision of a referee decides the game. If you want sport for its own sake go to the ground on a Saturday and watch the amateurs.

          Yeah. Never watched amateurs and expected them to play within the laws ... or even played amateur footy (or St Peters under 15) and played within the laws.

          At this level you expect the elite level athletes to know the laws and play within them.

          Sorry to disavow you of your perceptions...

          MrDenmoreM Offline
          MrDenmoreM Offline
          MrDenmore
          wrote on last edited by
          #278

          @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

          boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • chimoausC Offline
            chimoausC Offline
            chimoaus
            wrote on last edited by
            #279

            Just ask yourself, we are in the final and BBBR makes a mistake and misjudges a tackle on midget Faf in first 5 minutes and gets a red. We lose the game. How is that a good system.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • MrDenmoreM MrDenmore

              @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

              boobooB Offline
              boobooB Offline
              booboo
              wrote on last edited by
              #280

              @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

              @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

              All the more reason to enforce the laws that define the game and keep the players safe

              MrDenmoreM chimoausC 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • boobooB booboo

                @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

                All the more reason to enforce the laws that define the game and keep the players safe

                MrDenmoreM Offline
                MrDenmoreM Offline
                MrDenmore
                wrote on last edited by
                #281

                @booboo It’s a fine line. But keeping the players safe and keeping the punters watching are not always the same thing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • boobooB booboo

                  @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                  @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

                  All the more reason to enforce the laws that define the game and keep the players safe

                  chimoausC Offline
                  chimoausC Offline
                  chimoaus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #282

                  @booboo said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                  @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                  @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

                  All the more reason to enforce the laws that define the game and keep the players safe

                  Do the current laws really keep the players safe though? Does world rugby think all these red cards are an anomaly as surely no player would ever make a high tackle knowing it costs their team the game?
                  There will always be high tackles, it's just the way of the game, yes there should be penalties put in place and suspensions but having so many games ruined is not the way forward.

                  MrDenmoreM 1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • NTAN Offline
                    NTAN Offline
                    NTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #283

                    Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                    Rarely seen nowadays.

                    Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                    chimoausC voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
                    8
                    • chimoausC chimoaus

                      @booboo said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                      @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                      @booboo You’re naive mate. Athletes at this level will do what rewards them most. It’s about bucks.

                      All the more reason to enforce the laws that define the game and keep the players safe

                      Do the current laws really keep the players safe though? Does world rugby think all these red cards are an anomaly as surely no player would ever make a high tackle knowing it costs their team the game?
                      There will always be high tackles, it's just the way of the game, yes there should be penalties put in place and suspensions but having so many games ruined is not the way forward.

                      MrDenmoreM Offline
                      MrDenmoreM Offline
                      MrDenmore
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #284

                      @chimoaus Exactly. It’s about protecting the World Rugby board safe from litigation. It makes me laugh when I read all these naive idiots thinking it’s about player welfare.

                      MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • NTAN NTA

                        Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                        Rarely seen nowadays.

                        Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                        chimoausC Offline
                        chimoausC Offline
                        chimoaus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #285

                        @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                        Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                        Rarely seen nowadays.

                        Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                        Did you see the Italian game? I agree with you but do wonder if stopping tip tackles is easier than stopping the high tackle. I guess time will tell.

                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • chimoausC chimoaus

                          @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                          Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                          Rarely seen nowadays.

                          Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                          Did you see the Italian game? I agree with you but do wonder if stopping tip tackles is easier than stopping the high tackle. I guess time will tell.

                          NTAN Offline
                          NTAN Offline
                          NTA
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #286

                          @chimoaus said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                          @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                          Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                          Rarely seen nowadays.

                          Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                          Did you see the Italian game? I agree with you but do wonder if stopping tip tackles is easier than stopping the high tackle. I guess time will tell.

                          I agree. Tip tackles were relatively easy to address. High shots less so but they will need to be addressed in some way

                          chimoausC 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • NTAN NTA

                            Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                            Rarely seen nowadays.

                            Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                            voodooV Offline
                            voodooV Offline
                            voodoo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #287

                            @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                            Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                            Rarely seen nowadays.

                            Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                            I think the difference is that tip tackles is a technique that has no place in the game, much like (most) shoulder charges - fairly easy to identify and ideally eradicate. A high tackle though can be pretty subjective and has lots of elements, attacking players ducking, timing, slippage etc.

                            I think we all want truly high tackles out of the game, but I do think there is a grey area on this one

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • NTAN NTA

                              @chimoaus said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                              @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                              Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                              Rarely seen nowadays.

                              Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                              Did you see the Italian game? I agree with you but do wonder if stopping tip tackles is easier than stopping the high tackle. I guess time will tell.

                              I agree. Tip tackles were relatively easy to address. High shots less so but they will need to be addressed in some way

                              chimoausC Offline
                              chimoausC Offline
                              chimoaus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #288

                              @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                              @chimoaus said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                              @NTA said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                              Going back 4 years: tip tackles and Sam Warburton.

                              Rarely seen nowadays.

                              Let's hope high tackles go the same way.

                              Did you see the Italian game? I agree with you but do wonder if stopping tip tackles is easier than stopping the high tackle. I guess time will tell.

                              I agree. Tip tackles were relatively easy to address. High shots less so but they will need to be addressed in some way

                              Yeah I agree, even the Oz game there were numerous high tackles. I just think players are under so much pressure to be dominant and to rush up that a simple misjudgement at speed costs them dearly. It really is a tricky situation.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • MrDenmoreM MrDenmore

                                @chimoaus Exactly. It’s about protecting the World Rugby board safe from litigation. It makes me laugh when I read all these naive idiots thinking it’s about player welfare.

                                MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnow
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #289

                                @MrDenmore said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                                @chimoaus Exactly. It’s about protecting the World Rugby board safe from litigation. It makes me laugh when I read all these naive idiots thinking it’s about player welfare.

                                When you have to resort to calling someone who opposes your argument a naive idiot you've lost the argument.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                6
                                • Billy TellB Billy Tell

                                  Bit of a dud game in the end.

                                  Argentina have sadly regressed since 2015 rather than kicking on.

                                  sparkyS Offline
                                  sparkyS Offline
                                  sparky
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #290

                                  @Billy-Tell
                                  Some of the guys who were so good for the Jaguares in the Super season now look knackered and in need of the off-season.

                                  MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • sparkyS sparky

                                    @Billy-Tell
                                    Some of the guys who were so good for the Jaguares in the Super season now look knackered and in need of the off-season.

                                    MiketheSnowM Offline
                                    MiketheSnowM Offline
                                    MiketheSnow
                                    wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
                                    #291

                                    @sparky said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                                    @Billy-Tell
                                    Some of the guys who were so good for the Jaguares in the Super season now look knackered and in need of the off-season.

                                    Definitely.

                                    And there was a French no fucks given attitude for lots of the match unfortunately.

                                    They scored the best try of the match, could have had more.

                                    Interestingly the Japanese Sunwolves players look as fresh as daises

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      cgrant
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #292

                                      England had to win five successive hard fought games to win the RWC. Actually, it's only four. They played slowly and saved their energy all game long. The issue was never in doubt. Let's hope France give them a real test. An England loss would be great for the All Blacks.

                                      MiketheSnowM westcoastieW 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MiketheSnowM Offline
                                        MiketheSnowM Offline
                                        MiketheSnow
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #293

                                        Just watching the highlights on ITV4

                                        Red card incident seen from more angles than a dodecahedron.

                                        English charge down which should have been a YC at least?

                                        What English charge down? No mention of it.

                                        Or Tuilagi hitting the man in the air.

                                        CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C cgrant

                                          England had to win five successive hard fought games to win the RWC. Actually, it's only four. They played slowly and saved their energy all game long. The issue was never in doubt. Let's hope France give them a real test. An England loss would be great for the All Blacks.

                                          MiketheSnowM Offline
                                          MiketheSnowM Offline
                                          MiketheSnow
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #294

                                          @cgrant said in RWC: England v Argentina (Pool C):

                                          England had to win five successive hard fought games to win the RWC. Actually, it's only four. They played slowly and saved their energy all game long. The issue was never in doubt. Let's hope France give them a real test. An England loss would be great for the All Blacks.

                                          Billy hurt.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search