Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC: England v Australia (QF 1)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcenglandaustralia
706 Posts 68 Posters 46.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA antipodean

    @NTA Where's Simmons in your list?

    Has there been a more maligned player to reach 100 tests?

    NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

    @NTA Where's Simmons in your list?

    Has there been a more maligned player to reach 100 tests?

    Let me answer your question with a question: is it deserved?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • chimoausC Offline
      chimoausC Offline
      chimoaus
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      Difference could be Farrells boot, lack of consistency at 10 and goal kicking could bite the convicts. To be fair I think the tight 5 is going very well with good props which is hard to say.

      It really just comes down to which Wallabies side turns up, Perth version wins, Eden Park version gets destroyed.

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Offline
        O Offline
        Old Samurai Jack
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        It would take a small miracle for Aussie to steal this one (pun intended) but having said that if there is one game they can get up for it's the Poms. Biggest concern is the tight 5 and their 12s lack of a distribution game (Farrell will just knock him over all day).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • chimoausC chimoaus

          Difference could be Farrells boot, lack of consistency at 10 and goal kicking could bite the convicts. To be fair I think the tight 5 is going very well with good props which is hard to say.

          It really just comes down to which Wallabies side turns up, Perth version wins, Eden Park version gets destroyed.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Machpants
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          @chimoaus Farrell has been kicking crap this tourney

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • Stockcar86S Offline
            Stockcar86S Offline
            Stockcar86
            wrote on last edited by Stockcar86
            #26

            Cheika v Jones. Why can't both sides lose...

            NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • antipodeanA antipodean

              @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

              Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

              That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

              ACT CrusaderA Offline
              ACT CrusaderA Offline
              ACT Crusader
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

              My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

              Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

              That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

              That’s their best line for sure.

              Does Hodge come straight back in?

              antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kiwiinmelbK Offline
                kiwiinmelbK Offline
                kiwiinmelb
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                When does the banter between the coaches begin ?

                boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • Stockcar86S Stockcar86

                  Cheika v Jones. Why can't both sides lose...

                  NepiaN Offline
                  NepiaN Offline
                  Nepia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  @Stockcar86 said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                  Cheika v Jones. Why can't both sides lose...

                  One of those two actually seems like a decent bloke (and coach).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

                    Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

                    That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

                    That’s their best line for sure.

                    Does Hodge come straight back in?

                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                    My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

                    Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

                    That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

                    That’s their best line for sure.

                    Does Hodge come straight back in?

                    I think he will for Petaia with DHP at fullback if Beale isn't fit.

                    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                      @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                      @Rembrandt said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                      My concern with Oz is who is their best 10? Doesn't seem clear to me.

                      Doesn't seem clear to anyone I'd say. Foley is out of form. Lealiifano doesn't appear to be able to make the step up. Toomua too often plays like the second five-eighth he is.

                      That being said, I'd play White, Toomua, Kerevi and JOC

                      That’s their best line for sure.

                      Does Hodge come straight back in?

                      I think he will for Petaia with DHP at fullback if Beale isn't fit.

                      Crazy HorseC Offline
                      Crazy HorseC Offline
                      Crazy Horse
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      @antipodean you are probably right, but I would take a punt on Petaia. He seems one hell of a talent and the poms won't know too much about him.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                        I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

                        I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

                        juniorJ Offline
                        juniorJ Offline
                        junior
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                        I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

                        I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

                        Yep and if they play Toomua and Kerevi together then there is a decent chance they just might do so.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • No QuarterN No Quarter

                          @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

                          I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

                          On the flipside England will need to stop Koroibete and Kerevi from galloping over the advantage line as well. If the Wallabies forwards can slog their guts out to get some parity those two can wreck havoc.

                          juniorJ Offline
                          juniorJ Offline
                          junior
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          @mariner4life said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                          I didn't think the Wallabies would beat England in 2015 either, and they flogged the fuck out of them.

                          I reckon this will be tight as hell. If the Wallabies can stop Tuilagi galloping over the advantage line, they are a big hope.

                          On the flipside England will need to stop Koroibete and Kerevi from galloping over the advantage line as well. If the Wallabies forwards can slog their guts out to get some parity those two can wreck havoc.

                          Yep, I think there's a potential weakness in between Ford and Farrell - a bit wide out to be properly covered by the English loosies - that Kerevi should be looking to exploit all day. I'm also wondering if they might be tempted to start with Kerevi and Kuridrani in midfield to take on England at their own heavy duty, bash and crash game.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPom
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            England by 15.

                            For me now, England are cup favourites. I've watched Jones build their team and been quite impressed. They are big, physical and did I mention big?

                            Their achilles heel going in to this RWC was the fact they had to play 5 tough games in a row. Argies, French, QF, SF, Final. I thought that would be too much for the players, unless Eddie was able to effectively rotate subs. With the Argies game proving rather easy, and the French game canned, the ball really is in their court.

                            I think they'll destroy Australia, 15 point start, and then the SF they will be absolutely primed.

                            CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • MajorPomM MajorPom

                              England by 15.

                              For me now, England are cup favourites. I've watched Jones build their team and been quite impressed. They are big, physical and did I mention big?

                              Their achilles heel going in to this RWC was the fact they had to play 5 tough games in a row. Argies, French, QF, SF, Final. I thought that would be too much for the players, unless Eddie was able to effectively rotate subs. With the Argies game proving rather easy, and the French game canned, the ball really is in their court.

                              I think they'll destroy Australia, 15 point start, and then the SF they will be absolutely primed.

                              CatograndeC Offline
                              CatograndeC Offline
                              Catogrande
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              @MajorRage That's actually a reasonable attempt to put the curse on, but I would counter that with our lack of consistency, particularly in the second half of games. We have squandered some prime positions over the last 18 months or so and I don't see that Eddie has managed to fix that just yet.

                              juniorJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • CatograndeC Catogrande

                                @MajorRage That's actually a reasonable attempt to put the curse on, but I would counter that with our lack of consistency, particularly in the second half of games. We have squandered some prime positions over the last 18 months or so and I don't see that Eddie has managed to fix that just yet.

                                juniorJ Offline
                                juniorJ Offline
                                junior
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                @Catogrande said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                @MajorRage That's actually a reasonable attempt to put the curse on, but I would counter that with our lack of consistency, particularly in the second half of games. We have squandered some prime positions over the last 18 months or so and I don't see that Eddie has managed to fix that just yet.

                                That betrays the fact that the inconsistency and inconvenient lapses are more mental than anything. And who would be better placed - dare i say it, have the arrogance - to overcome such historic mental deficiencies than an Englishman?

                                CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

                                  When does the banter between the coaches begin ?

                                  boobooB Online
                                  boobooB Online
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @kiwiinmelb said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                  When does the banter between the coaches begin ?

                                  Dunno about the coaches but the journos and players may have kicked off ...

                                  https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rugby-world-cup/rwc-2019-japan/116578473/australia-v-england-wallabies-forwards-square-off-with-reporters-as-media-event-turns-frosty

                                  antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • juniorJ junior

                                    @Catogrande said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                    @MajorRage That's actually a reasonable attempt to put the curse on, but I would counter that with our lack of consistency, particularly in the second half of games. We have squandered some prime positions over the last 18 months or so and I don't see that Eddie has managed to fix that just yet.

                                    That betrays the fact that the inconsistency and inconvenient lapses are more mental than anything. And who would be better placed - dare i say it, have the arrogance - to overcome such historic mental deficiencies than an Englishman?

                                    CatograndeC Offline
                                    CatograndeC Offline
                                    Catogrande
                                    wrote on last edited by Catogrande
                                    #38

                                    @junior said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                    @Catogrande said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                    @MajorRage That's actually a reasonable attempt to put the curse on, but I would counter that with our lack of consistency, particularly in the second half of games. We have squandered some prime positions over the last 18 months or so and I don't see that Eddie has managed to fix that just yet.

                                    That betrays the fact that the inconsistency and inconvenient lapses are more mental than anything. And who would be better placed - dare i say it, have the arrogance - to overcome such historic mental deficiencies than an Englishman?

                                    Not being able to execute at all times, when fatigue or pressure comes along is indeed a mental issue.

                                    As to your second sentence, as a nation we only really have the one deficiency - we are sometimes too modest. :face_with_hand_over_mouth:

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • boobooB booboo

                                      @kiwiinmelb said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                      When does the banter between the coaches begin ?

                                      Dunno about the coaches but the journos and players may have kicked off ...

                                      https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rugby-world-cup/rwc-2019-japan/116578473/australia-v-england-wallabies-forwards-square-off-with-reporters-as-media-event-turns-frosty

                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @booboo so the best you can say is he's infused them with a sense of persecution.

                                      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                                        @booboo so the best you can say is he's infused them with a sense of persecution.

                                        boobooB Online
                                        boobooB Online
                                        booboo
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @antipodean said in RWC: England v Australia (QF 1):

                                        @booboo so the best you can say is he's infused them with a sense of persecution.

                                        Not sure he's developed an overwhelmingly positive environment.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          cgrant
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          I would take Coleman on the bench rather than two loosies.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search