• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcjapanspringboks
495 Posts 62 Posters 23.0k Views
RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #467

    @Chris-B said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @Duluth Is there a link to the protocols on tip tackles? I can't find one. Best I can find are these...

    Spear tackle - Wikipedia

    https://assets.usarugby.org/docs/refereeing/gmg-2015-hs.pdf (though this is for high school rugby).

    Spear tackle or tip tackle. Lifting a player from the ground, turning the
    body horizontal or beyond, and either driving the player into the ground or
    dropping the player without regard for the player’s safety. PK and Red Card.

    I think they apply the same logic as a tackle in the air when deciding sanction. The law quoted is only for dropping or spearing. Simply lifting and tipping has an outcome dependent on how the player lands. back or shoulder = YC, head or neck = RC

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #468

    South Africa's halftime reset was very impressive in its pragmatism and professionalism.

    In the first half they had the maul and the tackle going well, but as soon as they got the ball they were sucked in to trying really hard to score points, as if they themselves believed they needed to win by 30.

    Rassie obviously pulled them in to line at half time, and the 2nd half was a lesson in controlled brutality. Ignore the ball, give it to them, bash the piss out of them, and use the maul and scrum to not only grind them in to the turf, but generate penalties. And it was done to perfection. Japan had zero answer to it.

    That was the very definition of being overpowered. It wasn't exactly a spectacle, but the old forward in me loved it.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #469

    @mariner4life nice that you watched it with a fellow forward - hope the curtains were closed! Boom tish

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #470

    @Duluth said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @NTA said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Don't use those as they may be out of date - Law 9 has it per the link I posted.

    Thats just the language for if it's a penalty kick. It doesn't define the red card decision making framework

    There is no framework that I can find - probably because it was pretty obvious with a tip tackle.

    High tackle has been given more attention as part of WR's concussion program.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #471

    @Duluth said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @Chris-B said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Is there a link to the protocols on tip tackles? I can't find one.

    Can't find one

    They work through a flow diagram like the do with high tackles (link)

    Over the last few years refs have checked for the initial contact with the ground. Head/neck = red and shoulder etc yellow.
    They use that same deliberate structure and clearly state it.

    Thanks - a pity they don't have a protocol video like the one for high tackles.

    I'm thinking that quite recently I saw someone get red carded for lifting tackle where the ref said the tackler had driven the ball carrier into the ground.

    I'm thinking The Beast might have a nervous 24 hours - pretty close to cite-able IMO.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #472

    Re: the spear tackle. The landing was very similar to this one, with Ben Smith getting a yellow, not red. It's the example used in the WR Lawbook (Law 9.18).

    World Rugby Passport - Laws of the Game

    Edit: Owens basically got talked into making it a yellow. A very soft one IMO.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #473

    @Stargazer Ben Smith's one doesn't look as bad to me, probably because he's only got one leg.

    Here's Jerome Garces in action....video starts with the tip tackle.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #474

    @Chris-B The landing in that example is different. Also lifted much higher.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #475

    If Earls was only YC'd then it should have been upgraded to a Red for being a cnut while walking off

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #476

    @Stargazer Landing not too much IMO - Earls lifted him higher. Beast has gone on with the tackle - driven the Japanese guy. I reckon Barnes went for the quick yellow to avoid having to discuss red.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rugby-world-cup/rwc-2019-japan/116734253/rugby-world-cup-south-africa-prop-tendai-mtawarira-escapes-red-card-in-against-japan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by
    #477

    Seen a pic on facebook showing some Springboks not wearing their official world cup jerseys.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to mikedogz on last edited by
    #478

    @mikedogz said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Seen a pic on facebook showing some Springboks not wearing their official world cup jerseys.

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #479

    This whole game was poked once Barnes failed to red card Mtawarira. Japan got ripped off. The rugby public got ripped off. Would go so far as to say it also happened in the France-Wales game.
    We should be talking about a France-Japan semi. But no. Grrrr.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #480

    @Duluth said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    Thought the Boks were inaccurate in the first half.
    Two potential scoring opportunities messed up through poor skills.
    We can’t afford that next week against Wales.

    On the positive side, the best game I have seen from de Allende in ages. And very happy with our fitness. Last 20 the Bok power came through for us. But we will need to be better next week if we want to progress.

    The poor handling from the backs is the only real concern for the Boks.

    They've picked up plenty of wins against the ABs by backing their defence over 80mins and still getting the occasional try despite not playing much.
    The defence was at that level but the attack was appalling for most of the game.

    Sending up the shooter in defence (normally Faf) worked really well last night

    The lineout was incredible. The scrum was strong apart from one 7 man effort when the hook was missed.

    Faf's box kicks were a bit erratic

    Thinking of Henry's old line about the difficulty of getting up mentally three weeks in a row.. well there seemed to be an element of going through the motions in this match. Thats a luxury that over sides didn't have.

    Very astute post and agree on everything.
    If you have a game plan that doesn't focus on possession and you're happy to live off scavenged turnover ball, then you need to be really accurate once you have that turnover. The Boks butchered a good few of those opportunities in the first half. It still worked out ok but if their handling and accuracy in especially the backs doesn't improve markedly, we won't progress past Wales. The Welsh won't give us as many opportunities, and I expect them to keep picking up points throughout the game. Something Japan just couldn't manage. And then trying to chase the game, without possession is going to be a challenge.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #481

    Just saw the Mtarawira tip tackle. Isn't neck or shoulder into ground a red? Refs bottling it big time in the knockouts ... such inconsistency is bloody hard to take

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rembrandt
    wrote on last edited by
    #482

    How is it different from this?

    To be clear I thought this should have been a yellow at most.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to Rembrandt on last edited by
    #483

    @Rembrandt said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    To be clear I thought this should have been a yellow at most.

    Looks red to me, still.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy WebbB Offline
    Billy Webb
    wrote on last edited by Billy Webb
    #484

    Beast makes his apologies

    Inagaki responds:

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BlackheartB Offline
    BlackheartB Offline
    Blackheart
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #485

    @cgrant said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @taniwharugby said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @booboo @Billy-Webb

    I doubt the Chinese would support Japan ...

    Or North Korea. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #486

    @nzzp said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    @Rembrandt said in RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4):

    To be clear I thought this should have been a yellow at most.

    Looks red to me, still.

    Agreed - it was red then and red now.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1

RWC: Japan v South Africa (QF 4)
Rugby Matches
rwcjapanspringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.