Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcallblacksengland
2.0k Posts 121 Posters 200.3k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB booboo

    Just apropos to nothing.

    Did this match remind anyone of our 2011 semi final?

    Where the match was massively one sided and dominated by the eventual winners but the score stayed close enough to be in doubt?

    rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by rotated
    #1922

    @booboo said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

    Where the match was massively one sided and dominated by the eventual winners but the score stayed close enough to be in doubt?

    Yep and too an extent 2003. All three had an early try in the first ~5 minutes which was seemingly insurmountable. 2011 matched 2019 for physicality though IMO - Australia actually may have made more running to be fair.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • No QuarterN No Quarter

      Well shit, that all went extremely pear shaped.

      England did to us what we did to Ireland last week, only when we get that dominance up front we score a lot more points. They came out firing and put us on the back foot from the get go then never let up. Massive credit there, that was a huge performance. Have they played their final though?

      For us, after the initial onslaught we did somewhat get ourselves back into the game, but just pushed too many 50/50 plays and kept coughing it up at crucial times.

      Cane was huge for us last week to nullify the Irish pack in the first 40. He's always been someone that thrives in the tight exchanges early on, so benching him was a pretty baffling deicison TBH. SB was OK but Cane provides a point of difference.

      I love me some Jordie but he was only meant to be a squaddie. BFA on the bench would have been smart, especially given how early it is in Mo'unga's career. I would have subbed Richie early in the 2nd 40 and put Beauden back to 10. Experience matters in knock out matches and we needed calm heads after going behind early.

      I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

      But all of that is really just details when the forwards get smacked around like that. The English pack was amazing and Itoje showed just how good he is on the biggest possible stage.

      It's been 12 years since we got knocked out of a RWC. I wasn't super confident we could get up a 3rd time, though the Irish game did give me some hope, but at the end of the day England were too good on the night. If you think back to 2015 we struggled to get up for the semi final against an SA team that had just lost to Japan. This time around we hit a far superior side.

      So all in all I blame Ireland for losing to Japan and putting us on the wrong side of the bloody draw.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      pakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #1923

      @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

      Well shit, that all went extremely pear shaped.

      England did to us what we did to Ireland last week, only when we get that dominance up front we score a lot more points. They came out firing and put us on the back foot from the get go then never let up. Massive credit there, that was a huge performance. Have they played their final though?

      For us, after the initial onslaught we did somewhat get ourselves back into the game, but just pushed too many 50/50 plays and kept coughing it up at crucial times.

      Cane was huge for us last week to nullify the Irish pack in the first 40. He's always been someone that thrives in the tight exchanges early on, so benching him was a pretty baffling deicison TBH. SB was OK but Cane provides a point of difference.

      I love me some Jordie but he was only meant to be a squaddie. BFA on the bench would have been smart, especially given how early it is in Mo'unga's career. I would have subbed Richie early in the 2nd 40 and put Beauden back to 10. Experience matters in knock out matches and we needed calm heads after going behind early.

      I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

      But all of that is really just details when the forwards get smacked around like that. The English pack was amazing and Itoje showed just how good he is on the biggest possible stage.

      It's been 12 years since we got knocked out of a RWC. I wasn't super confident we could get up a 3rd time, though the Irish game did give me some hope, but at the end of the day England were too good on the night. If you think back to 2015 we struggled to get up for the semi final against an SA team that had just lost to Japan. This time around we hit a far superior side.

      So all in all I blame Ireland for losing to Japan and putting us on the wrong side of the bloody draw.

      Am I just rationalising, or I do I remember Shag saying in the knock out stages experience was irreplaceable, in which case Bender and Crotty on bench should have been a GIVEN?

      Feels like we were extremely arrogant just to assume we could FORCE our Plan A past Poms.

      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • Victor MeldrewV Victor Meldrew

        @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

        I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

        Was he due to play in the cancelled Italy game?

        P Offline
        P Offline
        pakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #1924

        @Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

        @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

        I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

        Was he due to play in the cancelled Italy game?

        With hindsight that cancellation may have been costly. Feels like BBBR would have been much the better for another 60 minutes game time.

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • No QuarterN No Quarter

          What about that box kick by Smith when we finally got attacking ball on their 22. What in the god damn fuck.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          pakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #1925

          @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

          What about that box kick by Smith when we finally got attacking ball on their 22. What in the god damn fuck.

          I can't EVER remember seeing that before?!

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • TimT Tim

            @Duluth "A disrespectful question", "If you want to go outside I'll give you a rugby education".

            Shut the fuck up you arrogant prick. You lost, the team was shit, you wear it.

            He has the tamest press in the world normally. Oh no, someone asked him if the All Blacks "turned up with the right mindset?" They didn't, they choked under the pressure.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            pakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #1926

            @Tim said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

            @Duluth "A disrespectful question", "If you want to go outside I'll give you a rugby education".

            Shut the fuck up you arrogant prick. You lost, the team was shit, you wear it.

            He has the tamest press in the world normally. Oh no, someone asked him if the All Blacks "turned up with the right mindset?" They didn't, they choked under the pressure.

            Not choked IMHO. Rattled and whenever they started to get momentum something happened to break it. Was it me or was the elapsed time on that game very long = plenty of 'rest' periods?

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • P pakman

              @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

              Well shit, that all went extremely pear shaped.

              England did to us what we did to Ireland last week, only when we get that dominance up front we score a lot more points. They came out firing and put us on the back foot from the get go then never let up. Massive credit there, that was a huge performance. Have they played their final though?

              For us, after the initial onslaught we did somewhat get ourselves back into the game, but just pushed too many 50/50 plays and kept coughing it up at crucial times.

              Cane was huge for us last week to nullify the Irish pack in the first 40. He's always been someone that thrives in the tight exchanges early on, so benching him was a pretty baffling deicison TBH. SB was OK but Cane provides a point of difference.

              I love me some Jordie but he was only meant to be a squaddie. BFA on the bench would have been smart, especially given how early it is in Mo'unga's career. I would have subbed Richie early in the 2nd 40 and put Beauden back to 10. Experience matters in knock out matches and we needed calm heads after going behind early.

              I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

              But all of that is really just details when the forwards get smacked around like that. The English pack was amazing and Itoje showed just how good he is on the biggest possible stage.

              It's been 12 years since we got knocked out of a RWC. I wasn't super confident we could get up a 3rd time, though the Irish game did give me some hope, but at the end of the day England were too good on the night. If you think back to 2015 we struggled to get up for the semi final against an SA team that had just lost to Japan. This time around we hit a far superior side.

              So all in all I blame Ireland for losing to Japan and putting us on the wrong side of the bloody draw.

              Am I just rationalising, or I do I remember Shag saying in the knock out stages experience was irreplaceable, in which case Bender and Crotty on bench should have been a GIVEN?

              Feels like we were extremely arrogant just to assume we could FORCE our Plan A past Poms.

              boobooB Offline
              boobooB Offline
              booboo
              wrote on last edited by
              #1927

              @pakman said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

              @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

              Well shit, that all went extremely pear shaped.

              England did to us what we did to Ireland last week, only when we get that dominance up front we score a lot more points. They came out firing and put us on the back foot from the get go then never let up. Massive credit there, that was a huge performance. Have they played their final though?

              For us, after the initial onslaught we did somewhat get ourselves back into the game, but just pushed too many 50/50 plays and kept coughing it up at crucial times.

              Cane was huge for us last week to nullify the Irish pack in the first 40. He's always been someone that thrives in the tight exchanges early on, so benching him was a pretty baffling deicison TBH. SB was OK but Cane provides a point of difference.

              I love me some Jordie but he was only meant to be a squaddie. BFA on the bench would have been smart, especially given how early it is in Mo'unga's career. I would have subbed Richie early in the 2nd 40 and put Beauden back to 10. Experience matters in knock out matches and we needed calm heads after going behind early.

              I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

              But all of that is really just details when the forwards get smacked around like that. The English pack was amazing and Itoje showed just how good he is on the biggest possible stage.

              It's been 12 years since we got knocked out of a RWC. I wasn't super confident we could get up a 3rd time, though the Irish game did give me some hope, but at the end of the day England were too good on the night. If you think back to 2015 we struggled to get up for the semi final against an SA team that had just lost to Japan. This time around we hit a far superior side.

              So all in all I blame Ireland for losing to Japan and putting us on the wrong side of the bloody draw.

              Am I just rationalising, or I do I remember Shag saying in the knock out stages experience was irreplaceable, in which case Bender and Crotty on bench should have been a GIVEN?

              Feels like we were extremely arrogant just to assume we could FORCE our Plan A past Poms.

              Well they forced theirs on to us.

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • boobooB booboo

                @pakman said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                Well shit, that all went extremely pear shaped.

                England did to us what we did to Ireland last week, only when we get that dominance up front we score a lot more points. They came out firing and put us on the back foot from the get go then never let up. Massive credit there, that was a huge performance. Have they played their final though?

                For us, after the initial onslaught we did somewhat get ourselves back into the game, but just pushed too many 50/50 plays and kept coughing it up at crucial times.

                Cane was huge for us last week to nullify the Irish pack in the first 40. He's always been someone that thrives in the tight exchanges early on, so benching him was a pretty baffling deicison TBH. SB was OK but Cane provides a point of difference.

                I love me some Jordie but he was only meant to be a squaddie. BFA on the bench would have been smart, especially given how early it is in Mo'unga's career. I would have subbed Richie early in the 2nd 40 and put Beauden back to 10. Experience matters in knock out matches and we needed calm heads after going behind early.

                I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

                But all of that is really just details when the forwards get smacked around like that. The English pack was amazing and Itoje showed just how good he is on the biggest possible stage.

                It's been 12 years since we got knocked out of a RWC. I wasn't super confident we could get up a 3rd time, though the Irish game did give me some hope, but at the end of the day England were too good on the night. If you think back to 2015 we struggled to get up for the semi final against an SA team that had just lost to Japan. This time around we hit a far superior side.

                So all in all I blame Ireland for losing to Japan and putting us on the wrong side of the bloody draw.

                Am I just rationalising, or I do I remember Shag saying in the knock out stages experience was irreplaceable, in which case Bender and Crotty on bench should have been a GIVEN?

                Feels like we were extremely arrogant just to assume we could FORCE our Plan A past Poms.

                Well they forced theirs on to us.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                pakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #1928

                @booboo said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                @pakman said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                @No-Quarter said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                Well shit, that all went extremely pear shaped.

                England did to us what we did to Ireland last week, only when we get that dominance up front we score a lot more points. They came out firing and put us on the back foot from the get go then never let up. Massive credit there, that was a huge performance. Have they played their final though?

                For us, after the initial onslaught we did somewhat get ourselves back into the game, but just pushed too many 50/50 plays and kept coughing it up at crucial times.

                Cane was huge for us last week to nullify the Irish pack in the first 40. He's always been someone that thrives in the tight exchanges early on, so benching him was a pretty baffling deicison TBH. SB was OK but Cane provides a point of difference.

                I love me some Jordie but he was only meant to be a squaddie. BFA on the bench would have been smart, especially given how early it is in Mo'unga's career. I would have subbed Richie early in the 2nd 40 and put Beauden back to 10. Experience matters in knock out matches and we needed calm heads after going behind early.

                I was also surprised we didn't try and play Rieko into some form given how much of a game breaker he is.

                But all of that is really just details when the forwards get smacked around like that. The English pack was amazing and Itoje showed just how good he is on the biggest possible stage.

                It's been 12 years since we got knocked out of a RWC. I wasn't super confident we could get up a 3rd time, though the Irish game did give me some hope, but at the end of the day England were too good on the night. If you think back to 2015 we struggled to get up for the semi final against an SA team that had just lost to Japan. This time around we hit a far superior side.

                So all in all I blame Ireland for losing to Japan and putting us on the wrong side of the bloody draw.

                Am I just rationalising, or I do I remember Shag saying in the knock out stages experience was irreplaceable, in which case Bender and Crotty on bench should have been a GIVEN?

                Feels like we were extremely arrogant just to assume we could FORCE our Plan A past Poms.

                Well they forced theirs on to us.

                And we asked for more! :angry_face:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SammyCS SammyC

                  @ACT-Crusader said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                  No concerns with that loss. We were outplayed and Eddie Jones did his thing.

                  Never got the criticism of Itoje because he’s played like this before. Well done that man.

                  Look forward to seeing the ABs one more time against the Boks. 😎

                  The criticism of Itoje is NZ rugby fan arrogance at its best.

                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugby
                  wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                  #1929

                  @SammyC why?

                  He has never played like that against us before, sure he is a beast in the English Premiership, but often players look huge at the next level down, but dont the step up. He has had glimpses, I thought he was average in the Lions, but this one he showed his full range for 80.

                  I mentioned earlier in the thread during the game he showed what all the 'hype' was about, he was outstanding; we are all entitled to our opinion, shit you read any thread on here with people from the same provinces/super franchises who disagree with how good/poor someone there is...that doesnt make anyone arrogant IMO, we all see things differently, we all expect/want different players to play certain ways, need only look at the player polls to see a wide range of opinions on peoples perceptions of who plays well or not.

                  His performance, along with others wearing the white jersey was one out of the box, aside from a couple of players in black who may have equalled thier opposite, we were comprehensively outplayed by England.

                  Next week will show if that was a one off or the start of somethign special for England.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1930

                    https://twitter.com/giteau_rugby/status/1188069186439806977

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • sparkyS Offline
                      sparkyS Offline
                      sparky
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1931

                      Amazing to think the side that demolished the All Blacks on Saturday were the same lot as conceded 38 consecutive points to Scotland in March:

                      ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • sparkyS Offline
                        sparkyS Offline
                        sparky
                        wrote on last edited by sparky
                        #1932

                        Here it is. Your Halloween Horror film:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • antipodeanA Offline
                          antipodeanA Offline
                          antipodean
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1933

                          Sumo thinks Scotty Barrett brings more physicality than Cane:
                          https://twitter.com/sumostevenson/status/1187286456965971969

                          juniorJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • kiwiinmelbK Offline
                            kiwiinmelbK Offline
                            kiwiinmelb
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1934

                            Will be interesting to see how England go in the final ,

                            Obviously they targeted the AB game big time ,

                            And some times its difficult to back up a big performance in consecutive weeks

                            CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

                              @gt12 said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                              @Billy-Webb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                              @Frank

                              I honestly don’t think it was a case of NZ not being “hungry” enough.
                              England simply didn’t allow you to play. They were that good on the night.

                              I strongly disagree. We had opportunities to just try and get territory, then from there, try to build pressure - get penalties - and try to break them down. Instead, with every piece of possession we got, we took terrible options, usually kicking it straight back to them. Had we buckled down after the first try, and said, fuck it, let's just play it in their half, we'd have put ourselves in the position to have challenged. But we never put them under any pressure - in their half - and the only time we did, we got a lucky try. I'm fucked if I know who was running things out there, but whoever it was shouldn't wear a black jersey again, And if the do, I hope they have nightmares about this game. We got fucking hammered .

                              Fair enough comment. There were some poor options taken. But I see that in the context of England putting so much pressure on the ABs.

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              pakman
                              wrote on last edited by pakman
                              #1935

                              @Billy-Webb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                              @gt12 said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                              @Billy-Webb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                              @Frank

                              I honestly don’t think it was a case of NZ not being “hungry” enough.
                              England simply didn’t allow you to play. They were that good on the night.

                              I strongly disagree. We had opportunities to just try and get territory, then from there, try to build pressure - get penalties - and try to break them down. Instead, with every piece of possession we got, we took terrible options, usually kicking it straight back to them. Had we buckled down after the first try, and said, fuck it, let's just play it in their half, we'd have put ourselves in the position to have challenged. But we never put them under any pressure - in their half - and the only time we did, we got a lucky try. I'm fucked if I know who was running things out there, but whoever it was shouldn't wear a black jersey again, And if the do, I hope they have nightmares about this game. We got fucking hammered .

                              Fair enough comment. There were some poor options taken. But I see that in the context of England putting so much pressure on the ABs.

                              England/Eddie got into out heads. We were rattled from the onset. Then they played more conservatively as game went on. In response, we kept forcing things.

                              I don't think the psychological impact of the two disallowed tries has been discussed. The net impact in reality was we kept them out on two occasions they were right in the red zone. a win of sorts. However, I'm guessing in reaction the ABs just got more desperate/less composed.

                              In the end it was the pressure which ABs PUT ON THEMSELVES which did for us! England's key input was important, but in essence passive -- by not trying anything too heroic it let us have full rein to over-egg the pudding.

                              Also sense England were looking to slow game down, which seemed to spur us to push even harder on the gas pedal.

                              But we had time on our hands. Compare with ABs against Dublin 2013 and going all the way back to Michael Lynagh in 1991 RWC quarters against Ireland.

                              Lessons to be learned.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • gt12G gt12

                                @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @Nepia said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @MiketheSnow

                                Cane would have made a difference.

                                Also think he adds a lot in the leadership department - sadly lacking today.

                                Yeah, it's utter BS to pretend Cane wouldn't have made a difference when starting even if the result stayed the same - we have a much better chance of a win if he starts.

                                Agreed.

                                But S Barrett is the fall guy for a very shit Read performance and captaincy.

                                Unfair IMHO.

                                Excellent point.

                                I think Read has been a great All Black, but he is no legend - his five missed tackles (ESPN stats) tell the story of a guy who is either injured or past it. If he was amazing last week against a shit Ireland, how can he be amazing - with those stats - against England? He ran OK (25 metres off of 8 runs), but his captaincy tonight was pretty appalling - he and the team looked lost. He's been surviving on being McCaw's successor and tonight showed that it's all for shit. We were under pressure., but this wasn't 2011 8-7, this was a hammering, and he was front and center missing tackles.

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                pakman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1936

                                @gt12 said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @Nepia said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                @MiketheSnow

                                Cane would have made a difference.

                                Also think he adds a lot in the leadership department - sadly lacking today.

                                Yeah, it's utter BS to pretend Cane wouldn't have made a difference when starting even if the result stayed the same - we have a much better chance of a win if he starts.

                                Agreed.

                                But S Barrett is the fall guy for a very shit Read performance and captaincy.

                                Unfair IMHO.

                                Excellent point.

                                I think Read has been a great All Black, but he is no legend - his five missed tackles (ESPN stats) tell the story of a guy who is either injured or past it. If he was amazing last week against a shit Ireland, how can he be amazing - with those stats - against England? He ran OK (25 metres off of 8 runs), but his captaincy tonight was pretty appalling - he and the team looked lost. He's been surviving on being McCaw's successor and tonight showed that it's all for shit. We were under pressure., but this wasn't 2011 8-7, this was a hammering, and he was front and center missing tackles.

                                Maybe he was carrying an injury?

                                gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sparkyS Offline
                                  sparkyS Offline
                                  sparky
                                  wrote on last edited by sparky
                                  #1937

                                  Forgot that the great George Smith was working in the England camp. His influence was all over their magnificent breakdown work.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • NTAN NTA

                                    I had a think about it and put my comments on Twitter. Here they are redrafted for the Fern:

                                    England don't rely on bounce of the ball. They may never be the most creative set of individuals but roles and responsibilities are understood and executed using the talents they have - an Eddie Jones hallmark.

                                    The ABs historically have a hard-nosed approach to the basics, but in recent years they've become a little tinny with some of their "miracle" plays like Barrett magic. They didn't have that, and tried too hard to find it last night.

                                    The "we will out-Kiwi them eventually" doesn't always stick

                                    You got a couple of rough calls from Nigel, which also historically hasn't happened (with Owens or any other ref). At that point the contrasts between leadership of McCaw and Read were highlighted.

                                    The NZRFU systems will ensure that kind of loss remains a rarity, but it's time for a refresh in the coaching ranks.

                                    In a way I'm disappointed (ABE) but would a threepeat with another tinny win be good for the game as a whole?

                                    No.

                                    Also interested to see ex-Fern stalwart Red Beard on Twitter, speculating about absences:

                                    Screenshot_20191027-082103~2.png

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    pakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1938

                                    @NTA said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                    I had a think about it and put my comments on Twitter. Here they are redrafted for the Fern:

                                    England don't rely on bounce of the ball. They may never be the most creative set of individuals but roles and responsibilities are understood and executed using the talents they have - an Eddie Jones hallmark.

                                    The ABs historically have a hard-nosed approach to the basics, but in recent years they've become a little tinny with some of their "miracle" plays like Barrett magic. They didn't have that, and tried too hard to find it last night.

                                    The "we will out-Kiwi them eventually" doesn't always stick

                                    You got a couple of rough calls from Nigel, which also historically hasn't happened (with Owens or any other ref). At that point the contrasts between leadership of McCaw and Read were highlighted.

                                    The NZRFU systems will ensure that kind of loss remains a rarity, but it's time for a refresh in the coaching ranks.

                                    In a way I'm disappointed (ABE) but would a threepeat with another tinny win be good for the game as a whole?

                                    No.

                                    Also interested to see ex-Fern stalwart Red Beard on Twitter, speculating about absences:

                                    Screenshot_20191027-082103~2.png

                                    What's Red Beard's Twitter handle?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

                                      Will be interesting to see how England go in the final ,

                                      Obviously they targeted the AB game big time ,

                                      And some times its difficult to back up a big performance in consecutive weeks

                                      CatograndeC Offline
                                      CatograndeC Offline
                                      Catogrande
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1939

                                      @kiwiinmelb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                      Will be interesting to see how England go in the final ,

                                      Obviously they targeted the AB game big time ,

                                      And some times its difficult to back up a big performance in consecutive weeks

                                      Gatland had that same swipe at England (funnily enough not at SA), Eddie's reply was priceless.

                                      kiwiinmelbK sparkyS 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • CatograndeC Catogrande

                                        @kiwiinmelb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                        Will be interesting to see how England go in the final ,

                                        Obviously they targeted the AB game big time ,

                                        And some times its difficult to back up a big performance in consecutive weeks

                                        Gatland had that same swipe at England (funnily enough not at SA), Eddie's reply was priceless.

                                        kiwiinmelbK Offline
                                        kiwiinmelbK Offline
                                        kiwiinmelb
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1940

                                        @Catogrande said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                        @kiwiinmelb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                        Will be interesting to see how England go in the final ,

                                        Obviously they targeted the AB game big time ,

                                        And some times its difficult to back up a big performance in consecutive weeks

                                        Gatland had that same swipe at England (funnily enough not at SA), Eddie's reply was priceless.

                                        Mine wasnt a swipe as such , just know that we have had the same issue ourselves at times

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • antipodeanA antipodean

                                          Sumo thinks Scotty Barrett brings more physicality than Cane:
                                          https://twitter.com/sumostevenson/status/1187286456965971969

                                          juniorJ Offline
                                          juniorJ Offline
                                          junior
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1941

                                          @antipodean said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):

                                          Sumo thinks Scotty Barrett brings more physicality than Cane:
                                          https://twitter.com/sumostevenson/status/1187286456965971969

                                          Clearly it wasn’t about lineouts, because they were an absolute shit show

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search