• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 40.4k Views
Cricket: NZ vs England
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #59

    @hydro11 said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Bovidae said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Poor crowd, poor venue.
    Should have played at the Basin

    The Basin only has a capacity of 6.5K at the moment.

    Museum Stand almost back open though.

    They got around 10K, which wouldn't have fit at the Basin as of today. I'm sure NZC was hoping for a bigger crowd but I wouldn't pay $60 either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #60

    @hydro11 said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    They would have backed themselves to get a bigger crowd. However, $60 for a T20 is sort of taking the piss. That is expensive, even though you can get 20% off.

    I think they are pricing themsleves out of the market. I was tempted to head along to Eden Park with my lad, but I don't love T20 cricket, and at $80 bucks he's got to be super keen. He's ambivalent - prefers playing to watching. So not going.

    Would spend more on Tests and ODI, but realise I'm a minority. Such is life

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    I paid $60 to go to the T20 here on Christchurch, was a full house so the market was obviously willing to pay it. Was a decent game, although we never got out of second gear and England won easily enough. Good to see us win yesterday to keep the series even.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #62

    NZ 40/1 after 3.5

    Guptill the man out (33 off 17)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #63

    and Munro cheaply again

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    CdG is so dangerous in this format.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by
    #65

    Taylor just isnt a great T20 batsmen.
    I hope he proves me wrong today.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    Guptill and Munro were deceived by slower balls, which looks to be a good option on this pitch.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #67

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Taylor just isnt a great T20 batsmen.
    I hope he proves me wrong today.

    I'm his number one fan but agree. He reinvented himself as a world class test and ODI batsmen. His days of smashing it around the ground like he did when he first came on the scene appear to be long behind him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
    Baron Silas Greenback
    wrote on last edited by Baron Silas Greenback
    #68

    The issue is that he has the talent, and the intent, but it just hasnt clicked thus far.
    You can see him trying to up the momentum, but it is almost like his cricket instincts fight the T20 smashing.

    HoorooH No QuarterN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #69

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    The issue is that he has the talent, and the intent, but it just hasnt clicked thus far.
    You can see him trying to up the momentum, but it is almost like his cricket instincts fight the T20 smashing.

    Well he is no Shane Watson, that is for sure....

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #70

    @Hooroo I'm not sure what Taylor was doing there. He seemed to think "fuck it" and just walked off.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #71

    @Bovidae said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Hooroo I'm not sure what Taylor was doing there. He seemed to think "fuck it" and just walked off.

    Really bizarre

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    NZ lost their way in the last few overs, having selected one less batsmen. Runs on the board I suppose. 180/7.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to Baron Silas Greenback on last edited by
    #73

    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    The issue is that he has the talent, and the intent, but it just hasnt clicked thus far.
    You can see him trying to up the momentum, but it is almost like his cricket instincts fight the T20 smashing.

    Yeah, that's what I meant - it's like he trained most of his attacking instincts out of himself to become a world class test player, and struggles to get them back when in T20 mode.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by Chris B.
    #74

    Good win - thought 180 would be enough with England fielding lots of rookies, but it probably shouldn't have been with Morgan and Vince together at 139/3.

    One thing that was notable at the start was they put up the various ages of the players - England trying all sorts of newbies, but of our guys:

    Rossco 35
    Guppy 33
    CdG 33
    Munro nearly 33
    Timmy nearly 31

    We need to start blooding some new batsmen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/19297/preview/1187668/new-zealand-vs-england-4th-t20i-england-in-new-zealand-2019-20

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    After a good first 4 overs from NZ, England were 17-1, 2 overs later they’re 48-1 from 6.

    Tickner bowled some real meat pies in his over that went for 18.

    Good start down the gurgler very quickly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by Gunner
    #77

    Tickner gone for 32 off his 12 deliveries.

    Please do not bowl him again Tim!

    We’re staring down the barrel of chasing well over 200 at the moment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86S Offline
    Stockcar86
    wrote on last edited by
    #78

    I'm thinking at 52 and having had 2 cortisone injections for my bad shoulder this morning, I could bowl better than Tickner today

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Cricket: NZ vs England
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.