Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 41.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by booboo
    #97

    So NZ bay first in what is now an E11.

    Make 146.

    England need 2.22 runs per ball.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CrucialC Offline
      CrucialC Offline
      Crucial
      wrote on last edited by
      #98

      Seriously?
      Again!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • HoorooH Do not disturb
        HoorooH Do not disturb
        Hooroo
        wrote on last edited by
        #99

        This is fascinating.

        In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

        Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • HoorooH Hooroo

          This is fascinating.

          In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

          Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
          Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
          Baron Silas Greenback
          wrote on last edited by
          #100

          @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

          This is fascinating.

          In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

          Did you see the first innings?

          HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
            Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
            Baron Silas Greenback
            wrote on last edited by
            #101

            Ross Taylor could have cost us this match with his bad running.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Baron Silas GreenbackB Baron Silas Greenback

              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

              This is fascinating.

              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

              Did you see the first innings?

              HoorooH Do not disturb
              HoorooH Do not disturb
              Hooroo
              wrote on last edited by
              #102

              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

              This is fascinating.

              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

              Did you see the first innings?

              No. Just describing what I watched

              Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CrucialC Offline
                CrucialC Offline
                Crucial
                wrote on last edited by
                #103

                Why did Seifert face first?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • HoorooH Hooroo

                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  This is fascinating.

                  In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                  Did you see the first innings?

                  No. Just describing what I watched

                  Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                  Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                  Baron Silas Greenback
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #104

                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  This is fascinating.

                  In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                  Did you see the first innings?

                  No. Just describing what I watched

                  The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                  HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #105

                    PTSD?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • boobooB booboo

                      So NZ bay first in what is now an E11.

                      Make 146.

                      England need 2.22 runs per ball.

                      boobooB Offline
                      boobooB Offline
                      booboo
                      wrote on last edited by booboo
                      #106

                      @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                      So NZ bay first in what is now an E11.

                      Make 146.

                      England need 2.22 runs per ball.

                      So we tied then lost the O1.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Chris B.C Online
                        Chris B.C Online
                        Chris B.
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #107

                        Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                        We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                        Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                        Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                        Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                        Unless there's strong evidence that the pitch is going to turn, I hope they seriously consider playing Ferguson in the tests and not playing a spinner.

                        SnowyS nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • Baron Silas GreenbackB Baron Silas Greenback

                          @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          This is fascinating.

                          In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                          Did you see the first innings?

                          No. Just describing what I watched

                          The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                          HoorooH Do not disturb
                          HoorooH Do not disturb
                          Hooroo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #108

                          @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          This is fascinating.

                          In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                          Did you see the first innings?

                          No. Just describing what I watched

                          The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                          Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                          Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                          Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Chris B.C Chris B.

                            Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                            We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                            Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                            Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                            Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                            Unless there's strong evidence that the pitch is going to turn, I hope they seriously consider playing Ferguson in the tests and not playing a spinner.

                            SnowyS Offline
                            SnowyS Offline
                            Snowy
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #109

                            @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                            Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                            Don't think they would have used Ferg for a super over at Eden park. Every edge or flick will be 6 or 4 even the slower ball probably. Agree they missed him and yeah should be considered for the tests.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • HoorooH Hooroo

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              This is fascinating.

                              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                              Did you see the first innings?

                              No. Just describing what I watched

                              The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                              Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                              Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                              Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                              Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                              Baron Silas Greenback
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #110

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              This is fascinating.

                              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                              Did you see the first innings?

                              No. Just describing what I watched

                              The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                              Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                              Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                              Yip. But the wide moves with the batsmen now. So if he moves slightly to off and it just goes down leg often it is not callef

                              SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Baron Silas GreenbackB Baron Silas Greenback

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                This is fascinating.

                                In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                                Did you see the first innings?

                                No. Just describing what I watched

                                The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                                Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                                Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                                Yip. But the wide moves with the batsmen now. So if he moves slightly to off and it just goes down leg often it is not callef

                                SiamS Offline
                                SiamS Offline
                                Siam
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #111

                                @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                This is fascinating.

                                In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                                Did you see the first innings?

                                No. Just describing what I watched

                                The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                                Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                                Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                                Yip. But the wide moves with the batsmen now. So if he moves slightly to off and it just goes down leg often it is not callef

                                Was an issue today where Boult bowled inside of the offside crease guide line and, presumably, the batsman had moved sufficiently leg side for a ball bowled inside the marker to be called wide.

                                Might have been an umpire mistake but we can't have balls inside the off marker being wided because of batsman moving

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                  Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                  We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                  Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                  Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                  Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                                  Unless there's strong evidence that the pitch is going to turn, I hope they seriously consider playing Ferguson in the tests and not playing a spinner.

                                  nzzpN Online
                                  nzzpN Online
                                  nzzp
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #112

                                  @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                  We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                  Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                  Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                  The two overs where Ish went for 3 sixes ina row, after Kuggelijn got pumped cost us the game I reckon. 40 off two overs let them back in and surrendered the momentum nicely.

                                  Also, Boult missed a straightforward runout, and that was super frustrating.

                                  Then it was just down to two big sixes in the super over - they could, we couldn't. Good game. Shout out to the ground; had no expectation of play when it chucked it down all morning and early afternoon

                                  ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • nzzpN nzzp

                                    @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                    We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                    Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                    Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                    The two overs where Ish went for 3 sixes ina row, after Kuggelijn got pumped cost us the game I reckon. 40 off two overs let them back in and surrendered the momentum nicely.

                                    Also, Boult missed a straightforward runout, and that was super frustrating.

                                    Then it was just down to two big sixes in the super over - they could, we couldn't. Good game. Shout out to the ground; had no expectation of play when it chucked it down all morning and early afternoon

                                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                    ACT Crusader
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #113

                                    @nzzp speaking of big overs, and not sure if mentioned, did anyone else see Kiwi Sophie Devine hit 5 consecutive 6’s off the final over of the WBBL game today? On her way to a match winning 85no.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • DuluthD Offline
                                      DuluthD Offline
                                      Duluth
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #114

                                      New Zealand Test squad:
                                      Todd Astle, Tom Blundell, Trent Boult, Colin de Grandhomme, Lockie Ferguson, Matt Henry, Tom Latham, Henry Nicholls, Jeet Raval, Mitchell Santner, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Neil Wagner, BJ Watling (wk), Kane Williamson (c)

                                      https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/28078846/lockie-ferguson-line-new-zealand-test-debut-maiden-call-up

                                      Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • DuluthD Duluth

                                        New Zealand Test squad:
                                        Todd Astle, Tom Blundell, Trent Boult, Colin de Grandhomme, Lockie Ferguson, Matt Henry, Tom Latham, Henry Nicholls, Jeet Raval, Mitchell Santner, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Neil Wagner, BJ Watling (wk), Kane Williamson (c)

                                        https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/28078846/lockie-ferguson-line-new-zealand-test-debut-maiden-call-up

                                        Chris B.C Online
                                        Chris B.C Online
                                        Chris B.
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #115

                                        I'm a bit surprised to see Astle and Santner as the spinners and both Patel and Somerville not.

                                        Hope they think long and hard about playing without a spinner in NZ. Seems like a long time since any NZ spinner took a bag of wickets at home.

                                        canefanC BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
                                        4
                                        • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                          I'm a bit surprised to see Astle and Santner as the spinners and both Patel and Somerville not.

                                          Hope they think long and hard about playing without a spinner in NZ. Seems like a long time since any NZ spinner took a bag of wickets at home.

                                          canefanC Away
                                          canefanC Away
                                          canefan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #116

                                          @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          I'm a bit surprised to see Astle and Santner as the spinners and both Patel and Somerville not.

                                          Hope they think long and hard about playing without a spinner in NZ. Seems like a long time since any NZ spinner took a bag of wickets at home.

                                          And don't leave out Wags!!!

                                          SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search