Aussie Cricket 2019/20

[NTA]

@Siam said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@NTA those pink balls don't like games going more than 3 and a half days though, which is fine.

Oh is this another daynight test?

[Siam]

@NTA hope so!

[NTA]

Smith just ticked up 7000 runs, passing Bradman (6996) in the process.

Fastest ever at 126 innings.

Wally Hammond next on 131.

[NTA]

Angry Lesbian fails again going the slog.

Warner gets a triple. First one at Adelaide Oval.

@Virgil shits himself with rage.

[NTA]

And now he's just swinging for the rope. 6 over cow, followed by a loose edge over second slip for 4

[booboo]

@NTA said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

And now he's just swinging for the rope. 6 over cow, followed by a loose edge over second slip for 4

Going for 4 hundy?

[mariner4life]

Fuck you, you flat track fuckwit

[booboo]

Hang on. What's the go about running overthrows when the ball hits the stumps?

[NTA]

@mariner4life said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

Fuck you, you flat track fuckwit

You Queenslanders can't do anything but hate on a blue bagger

[NTA]

@booboo said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@NTA said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

And now he's just swinging for the rope. 6 over cow, followed by a loose edge over second slip for 4

Going for 4 hundy?

Nah. Have a crack at them now

[booboo]

@NTA yeah. Two cracks at it:

1. New ball
2. Swinging ball in the evening

Pakis looking for rain I reckon.

[NTA]

Danger man gone?

Yep. Good catch.

[NTA]

Chew for chewnty chew

[Wairau]

@booboo said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@NTA yeah. Two cracks at it:

1. New ball
2. Swinging ball in the evening

Pakis looking for rain I reckon.

Given his rate of scoring, wouldn't it have been better they give him 15 more overs to try for 400* ? Chance to make history? Or they didn't want Warner's name as the one making that history?

[NTA]

@Wairau said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@booboo said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@NTA yeah. Two cracks at it:

1. New ball
2. Swinging ball in the evening

Pakis looking for rain I reckon.

Given his rate of scoring, wouldn't it have been better they give him 15 more overs to try for 400* ? Chance to make history? Or they didn't want Warner's name as the one making that history?

What's your point?

[Wairau]

@NTA wondering why they declared before letting Warner make 400

[NTA]

@Wairau said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@NTA wondering why they declared before letting Warner make 400

Game to win. Weather forecast looking dodgy.

Clearly wanted second place.

The "maybe they don't want Warner to have the record" comment smacked of conspiracy.

[Wairau]

@NTA cheers, it just seemed strange not to give him an hour more. If you gave him 5 overs more he'd feasibly be on 370+, then you couldn't really call him in.....and looks like you'll win handily with at least most of 2 days to remaining after Pakistan's second innings...

[Wairau]

@NTA said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@Wairau said in Aussie Cricket 2019/20:

@NTA wondering why they declared before letting Warner make 400

Game to win. Weather forecast looking dodgy.

Clearly wanted second place.

The "maybe they don't want Warner to have the record" comment smacked of conspiracy.

Lol, plenty of others are questioning this decision, too..
https://www.radiosport.co.nz/on-air/the-devlin-radio-show/audio/dan-liebke-should-david-warner-have-been-allowed-to-get-400/

[Donsteppa]

Top work by Yasir Shah.