• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
5.4k Posts 63 Posters 741.0k Views
Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #338

    <p>Heading in on Friday night.  Not long now :)</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #339

    <p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-ways-star-wars-broke-hollywood-forever/'>http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-ways-star-wars-broke-hollywood-forever/</a></p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>:whistle:</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #340

    <p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11561555'>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11561555</a></p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Looks like the critics like it</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gollumG Offline
    gollumG Offline
    gollum
    wrote on last edited by
    #341

    <p>

    </p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mooshld
    wrote on last edited by
    #342

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="canefan" data-cid="547782" data-time="1450184741">
    <div>
    <p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11561555'>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11561555</a></p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Looks like the critics like it</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>They liked the phantom menace as well, all the initial reviews were good. Same goes for Avatar and Titanic movies that are basically unwatchable these days.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I think these types of blockbuster have to sit with people for a while before they are properly evaluated. Opens here tonight in Paris, will go when the mania calms down a bit though as there is a lack of baby sitters around at the moment due to xmas party season.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Mooshld</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #343

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mooshld" data-cid="547916" data-time="1450256137">
    <div>
    <p><strong>They liked the phantom menace as well, all the initial reviews were good. </strong>Same goes for Avatar and Titanic movies that are basically unwatchable these days.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I think these types of blockbuster have to sit with people for a while before they are properly evaluated. Opens here tonight in Paris, will go when the mania calms down a bit though as there is a dirt of baby sitters around at the moment due to xmas party season.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Mooshld</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Yeah, I think that the Herald and the Guardian gave it five stars.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #344

    <p>Big difference between reviews for <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-i---the-phantom-menace'>The Phantom Menace</a> and <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-vii---the-force-awakens'>The Force Awakens</a></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #345

    <p>Difficult to measure what the ratings would have been during opening week, unless you go back through archive.org and check the sites.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #346

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mooshld" data-cid="547916" data-time="1450256137">
    <div>
    <p>They liked the phantom menace as well, all the initial reviews were good. Same goes for Avatar and Titanic movies that are basically unwatchable these days.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>and on the flip side, the very first Star Wars movie got some terrible reviews on release.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #347

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crucial" data-cid="547971" data-time="1450305045">
    <div>
    <p>and on the flip side, the very first Star Wars movie got some terrible reviews on release.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Wasn't that ESB? ESB wasn't well received initially because it had no proper ending. It was just a bunch of plot.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #348

    <p>I guess to be fair there were quite a few good reviews in '77 as well.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>But then, remember that some of them were also after critics had noticed audience reactions and people walking straight to the ticket office after the movie so they could see it again.</p>
    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
    <p>When Star Wars came out in 1977, nobody knew it would become the classic that we all recognize today. Some people were skeptical, for sure. But few reviewers were as hilariously savage as John Simon, with New York Magazine, who called it "a set of giant baubles manipulated by an infant mind."</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
    <p>Here are some choice passages from Simon's review, which you can read over at Google Books:</p>
    <p>I sincerely hope that science and scientists differ from science fiction and its practitioners. Heaven help us if they don't: We may be headed for a very boring world indeed. Strip Star Wars of its often striking images and its high-falutin scientific jargon, and you get a story, characters, and dialogue of overwhelming banality, without even a "future" cast to them. Human beings, anthropoids, or robots, you could probably find them all, more or less like, that, in downtown Los Angeles today...</p>
    <p>O dull new world! We are treated to a galactic civil war, assorted heroes and villains, a princely maiden in distress, a splendid old man surviving from an extinct order of knights who possessed a mysterious power called "the Force," and it is all as exciting as last year's weather reports.... Why, even the most exciting fight is an old-fashioned duel, for all that the swords have laser beams for blades....</p>
    <p>Here it is all trite characterization and paltry verbiage... The one exception is Alec Guinness as the grand old man Ben Kenobi (Ben for the Hebrew ben, to make him sound Biblical and good; Kenobi probably from cannibis, i.e., hashish, for reasons you can probably guess.)...</p>
    <p>Still, Star Wars will do very nicely for those lucky enough to be children or unlucky enough never to have grown up.<br>
    Ouch.</p>
    <p>Also found on Google Books: a 1983 article from Texas Monthly, which takes issue with a May 23, 1983 Time Magazine cover story about Return of the Jedi. Apparently, Time insisted that Return of the Jedi "represents a return to striding form after the lunging missteps of The Empire Strikes Back." (The actual Time Magazine article isn't online, and I haven't had time to look for it in the library.)</p>
    <p> </p>
    </blockquote>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #349

    <p>Used to be a big fan of star wars but havent really got in to it as an adult.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>My kids got some star wars lego etc and is keen see the new movie but I suspect its better if he watches the earlier ones first.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>What's the correct watching order now?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Our renos are almost complete so will be go the give the new home theater setup a good breaking in.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #350

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="JK" data-cid="547978" data-time="1450306169">
    <div>
    <p>Used to be a big fan of star wars but havent really got in to it as an adult.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>My kids got some star wars lego etc and is keen see the new movie but I suspect its better if he watches the earlier ones first.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>What's the correct watching order now?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Our renos are almost complete so will be go the give the new home theater setup a good breaking in.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Suggested order I think is watch 4, 5 and then 1, 2, 3 and then 6. That way you still get the reveal from the ESB and the redemption from Jedi is even better having seen the prequels.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #351

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="547980" data-time="1450307017">
    <div>
    <p>Suggested order I think is watch 4, 5 and then 1, 2, 3 and then 6. That way you still get the reveal from the ESB and the redemption from Jedi is even better having seen the prequels.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Or the Machete order <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.nomachetejuggling.com/2011/11/11/the-star-wars-saga-suggested-viewing-order/'>http://www.nomachetejuggling.com/2011/11/11/the-star-wars-saga-suggested-viewing-order/</a></p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #352

    Just came back from seeing Force Awaken..<br><br>
    Wow did not see the cameo from Jar Jar coming at all !

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    wrote on last edited by
    #353

    It was way more than a cameo! I did find his kids a little annoying...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #354

    <p>This might be a thread to stay away from till one sees the movie then?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #355

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Siam" data-cid="548039" data-time="1450327355">
    <div>
    <p>This might be a thread to stay away from till one sees the movie then?</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Yup unless you want to hear about the return of mace Windu as well</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #356

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Virgil" data-cid="548040" data-time="1450328252">
    <div>
    <p>Yup unless you want to hear about the return of mace Windu as well</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>I have no idea what that means Virg, but good answer :)</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #357

    <p>Really enjoyed it, a big improvement on the prequels.</p>
    <p>Without going too in depth and spoiling it for others (no idea how to use the spoiler tags) Only slight nick picking would be the rehash of Episode IV's plot.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>oh and its easy to see why luke was missing was the bulk of the promo material.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Star Wars VII ****contains spoilers****
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.