• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket: NZ vs Aus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.4k Posts 62 Posters 106.2k Views
Cricket: NZ vs Aus
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #835

    One positive is we haven't let Warner cash in.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #836

    I'd definitely take Neesham over Santner, seems like Santner is being picked to bat and Neesham is much better than him at that discipline.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #837

    Commentators speculating on declaration tonight - but, I can't see it. If they had any intention of us batting today, surely they'd have just enforced the follow-on.

    I reckon they'll bat on for an hour tomorrow to completely bat us out of the game. Lead by 550 - bat Burns into some form - wear our bowlers down - and still leave themselves still five and a half sessions to bowl us out.

    Given a short turnaround - I wonder whether we'll leave Timmy out of the third test. He looks the most knackered of our bowlers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to kev on last edited by
    #838

    @kev said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @hydro11 Sommerville is good with the bat.

    Santner's FC average is 30, Someville averages 18. Somerville is 35 and has never hit a FC 50 (although he does have one good innings for NZ). Not in the same class as Santner and not really good enough to bat 8.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #839

    @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @Godder said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @hydro11 said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @Godder said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @hydro11 if Santner can't tie up an end with the ball, he's a specialist batsman at 8. Why are we picking him at 8 instead of finding a middle order batsman who can roll the arm over?

    I don't think there really is such a player domestically. Our spin bowling batting all-rounders is probably limited to George Worker unless I am forgetting someone obvious. Santner does have a career economy rate of 2.75 in tests so it's not like he is regularly getting pasted.

    Doesn't have to be a spinner - if Santner's not taking wickets, it can be anything.

    Jimmy Neesham?

    But his economy rate is 3.47 domestically. He isn't a 5th seamer in that he is a guy to toss the ball to just to bowl overs. Neesham is better with the newer ball. Anderson would be a better 5th seamer.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #840

    @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @hydro11 said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Still lots of gaps in the Aussie team though. Wade, Head and then Paine is a weak 5, 6, 7 (especially in foreign conditions).

    That's what I thought. But I'd take their production from our 5 6 7.

    You would take their production in this game against our attack. You wouldn't have taken their record over the last 2 years. I wonder how those three would have gone against their attack?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #841

    Left arm slow gets a wicket!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #842

    @hydro11 But no 8 needs to bowl. Especially in our team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #843

    @hydro11 Corey Anderson?

    I don't think he's bowling anymore and seems only to be playing short forms.

    The Aussies have lost 9 for 143. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #844

    Wagner has certainly fronted on this tour.

    Steve Smith = Wagner's Bunny

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #845

    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Wagner has certainly fronted on this tour.

    Steve Smith = Wagner's Bunny

    That's remarkable by itself. What a bowler

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #846

    TBH, how hard the bowlers are fighting just makes me even more pissed at the batsmen.

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kev
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #847

    @Mokey the bowlers have bowled with one short in the first test, without a spinning option, backed up from some short batting innings. Big effort. They lack the strike power of the Aussies but have bowled to their plans well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #848

    @nzzp said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Wagner has certainly fronted on this tour.

    Steve Smith = Wagner's Bunny

    That's remarkable by itself. What a bowler

    He's earned rave reviews. The only bright spot

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #849

    Broken hand for Boult. 😞

    Heading home after the test. Still bowling this arvo though.

    B boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #850

    To think, they've kept Bradman II quiet and are still going to get the 2 biggest consecutive hidings in our history.

    What a waste.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaioT Offline
    TeWaio
    wrote on last edited by
    #851

    If our batsmen got to face our bowlers we'd score 400+ easily.

    Similarly if the Aussie batsmen had to face their bowlers they'd probably be rolled for under 200.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #852

    Assistant Jordie Barrett was out easily too

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Biorealism
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #853

    @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    Broken hand for Boult. 😞

    Heading home after the test. Still bowling this arvo though.

    Hopefully they take the opportunity to fly over Sommerville.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #854

    Neil Wagner should be one of the first names on the BCs team sheet in as many forms of the game as he wishes. That is all

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Cricket: NZ vs Aus
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.