Cricket: NZ vs Aus
-
I feel for the good of the country 3 days of rain over all of aussie would be great.
-
Guessing that Timmy's dropping was planned in advance based on not being good enough and wanting to give him a wake-up call, only for them to have to scramble to continue to justify it after everyone broke down.
@Godder said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Guessing that Timmy's dropping was planned in advance based on not being good enough and wanting to give him a wake-up call, only for them to have to scramble to continue to justify it after everyone broke down.
As pointed out in the paper, Southee has been in pretty good form in tests in recent years. So based on test form and the options available, Stead’s decision deserves some scrutiny. Also the selectors named him vice captain - so it seems the Coach and the selectors have different opinions.
-
@booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
So ... reckon we won the day today?
96 (oops... a little optimistic ... ) for 171 and 63 for 0.Aus resting on their laurels having only to play NZ A?
@booboo Yeah - I'd say the first session today was evens and we won the second and third.
However, Oz won all three yesterday, so we need to win the first tomorrow to get things back on an even keel. 80/1 in the morning session would do that - we'd trail by 311 with nine wickets in hand.
Unfortunately, the openers aren't protecting Little Kane - it's a 'flu-ridden Jeet.
Out of interest, I think only won 1 session in the first test (3rd session on Day 3), but we did win three sessions in the 2nd test - though some of these wins were when Oz was trying to accelerate the run-rate.
At the moment I'm scoring it Oz 20; NZ 6; Even 4.
-
@booboo Yeah - I'd say the first session today was evens and we won the second and third.
However, Oz won all three yesterday, so we need to win the first tomorrow to get things back on an even keel. 80/1 in the morning session would do that - we'd trail by 311 with nine wickets in hand.
Unfortunately, the openers aren't protecting Little Kane - it's a 'flu-ridden Jeet.
Out of interest, I think only won 1 session in the first test (3rd session on Day 3), but we did win three sessions in the 2nd test - though some of these wins were when Oz was trying to accelerate the run-rate.
At the moment I'm scoring it Oz 20; NZ 6; Even 4.
-
Great to see us wrap up the last 5 wickets for 50 odd.
And then the openers dug in and batted an entire session, WTF?
They actually did bloody well, the bowling (helped by the pitch) was demanding and they didn’t ever look to be in a lot of trouble.Really liking Tom Blundell, he’s got some ticker that fulla!
More of the same tomorrow please.
-
@booboo Yeah - I'd say the first session today was evens and we won the second and third.
However, Oz won all three yesterday, so we need to win the first tomorrow to get things back on an even keel. 80/1 in the morning session would do that - we'd trail by 311 with nine wickets in hand.
Unfortunately, the openers aren't protecting Little Kane - it's a 'flu-ridden Jeet.
Out of interest, I think only won 1 session in the first test (3rd session on Day 3), but we did win three sessions in the 2nd test - though some of these wins were when Oz was trying to accelerate the run-rate.
At the moment I'm scoring it Oz 20; NZ 6; Even 4.
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@booboo Yeah - I'd say the first session today was evens and we won the second and third.
However, Oz won all three yesterday, so we need to win the first tomorrow to get things back on an even keel. 80/1 in the morning session would do that - we'd trail by 311 with nine wickets in hand.
Unfortunately, the openers aren't protecting Little Kane - it's a 'flu-ridden Jeet.
Out of interest, I think only won 1 session in the first test (3rd session on Day 3), but we did win three sessions in the 2nd test - though some of these wins were when Oz was trying to accelerate the run-rate.
At the moment I'm scoring it Oz 20; NZ 6; Even 4.
Maybe everyone will move up to give Jeets time to recover. The anti-Richardson transformation will be complete when Jeets and BJ combine to post NZ's highest ever total for the 7th (or 8th) wicket
-
@Donsteppa We have had a few of those before but in those cases there were no NZ batsmen having to face up.
-
@Chris-B I’m scoring it 2-0 and most likely 3-0
@Yeahtheboys said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Chris-B I’m scoring it 2-0 and most likely 3-0
It's that attention to detail that makes all the difference!
-
I think today's play by the Black Caps has shown they read the Fern. It is pretty obvious they are implementing the cunning plan hatched by @Damo a couple of pages ago.
-
@Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
How good! A day with only ‘Strayan wickets falling!
Two days in a row!!
-
There's a fair amount of self delusion afflicting the world at present. Aussie cricket team join in:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12298070
Further to the above, no hotspot (none - sorry Punter, Patto and Larbusmanushaggy), no snicko until way after passing the bat, Dar unmoved (sure, not always the best indication ...), Angry Lesbian unmoved at 1st slip ... and what is wrong with the DRS again?
-
There was a little spot on the bat. However it was very small and it wasn't clear it was where the ball went past. The spot could have come from anything.
No snicko meant that there wasn't enough to overturn the decision.
@Damo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
There was a little spot on the bat. However it was very small and it wasn't clear it was where the ball went past. The spot could have come from anything.
No snicko meant that there wasn't enough to overturn the decision.
thank you Nigel
