• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Movie review thread...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
19.8k Posts 163 Posters 3.2m Views
Movie review thread...
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #11942

    @Virgil I've definitely seen at least one of the LOTRs and maybe the first hobbit one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #11943

    @R-L said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    You are all scaring me now this is too much pressure.

    The best films are 4,5,6. The other six are pretty meh, but have good special effects.

    I would just skip to 4,5,6 and circle back to the rest. There is a twist in there that 1,2,3 will spoil.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #11944

    @Kirwan said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @R-L said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    You are all scaring me now this is too much pressure.

    The best films are 4,5,6. The other six are pretty meh, but have good special effects.

    I would just skip to 4,5,6 and circle back to the rest. There is a twist in there that 1,2,3 will spoil.

    Do as Kirwan says. It's not too late to jump to 4 5 6 and it won't ruin 2 and 3 (they do a good job of that on their own)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #11945

    Yeah I was jumping on to say this, don't start at 1 it's poor, 2 and 3 are even worse. 456 and Rogue 1 are fun

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #11946

    Start with Return of the Jedi, then go to the Hobbit, then go to Return of the King, circle back to the Half Blood Prince, then Temple of Doom, then from there, you will know which one to go with next!

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #11947

    R1,4,5,6

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Crucial on last edited by Duluth
    #11948

    @Crucial said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    R1,4,5,6

    Correct. Then pretend the rest don't exist

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #11949

    I’m afraid @R-L has ignited yet another Star Wars debate, looking forward to when the new trilogy (episodes 7-8-9) are mentioned...

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #11950

    @Virgil said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    I’m afraid @R-L has ignited yet another Star Wars debate, looking forward to when the new trilogy (episodes 7-8-9) are mentioned...

    alt text

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #11951

    @canefan The rest of the movies are fine, the original trilogy are great and actually changed how movies were made and marketed.

    The sequel trilogy isn't even as good as the marvel movies, which themselves are just very good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #11952

    Can I add in that I don't understand the derision that Solo got.

    Like the prequels and sequels it didn't stand up to the OT but as a standalone within the SW universe it is watchable escapism. Got fucked up from being better by the change of producers while filming in that it isn't as cohesive as it could have been but I still think it was an OK watch with some very good moments.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #11953

    @Crucial said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Can I add in that I don't understand the derision that Solo got.

    Like the prequels and sequels it didn't stand up to the OT but as a standalone within the SW universe it is watchable escapism. Got fucked up from being better by the change of producers while filming in that it isn't as cohesive as it could have been but I still think it was an OK watch with some very good moments.

    That was one of the better Star Wars movies. Had some real clunker moments in it though.

    Hinting that Lando was fucking his droid, awful way Han got his name, for example.

    I'd have been interested to see the original vision from the first directors. You could feel there was a manic farce element bubbling underneathe. That might have been something different.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #11954

    @Kirwan said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @Crucial said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Can I add in that I don't understand the derision that Solo got.

    Like the prequels and sequels it didn't stand up to the OT but as a standalone within the SW universe it is watchable escapism. Got fucked up from being better by the change of producers while filming in that it isn't as cohesive as it could have been but I still think it was an OK watch with some very good moments.

    That was one of the better Star Wars movies. Had some real clunker moments in it though.

    Hinting that Lando was fucking his droid, awful way Han got his name, for example.

    I'd have been interested to see the original vision from the first directors. You could feel there was a manic farce element bubbling underneathe. That might have been something different.

    Or if Richie Cunningham had the project earlier. He can be bland but does know how to tell a story. I’d imagine it would have been much more along the lines of 4 with a setup, crisis, escape, action and outcome instead of trying to squeeze in elements that had already had money spent on them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #11955

    @R-L said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    What is a star wars fan known as?

    Fucking sad fluffybunnies

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWCR Offline
    RoninWC
    wrote on last edited by
    #11956

    Just got Movies added for free to Foxtel after threatening to cancel the entire service.

    So the wife and I watched a few things, nothing really worth noting except...

    A movie I've watched at least half a dozen times but it had been a few years since last viewing and one that is definitely in my top 10 list, Groundhog Day.

    Absolute brilliance and still holds up today. A master class by Bill Murray, just nails it.

    CrucialC voodooV ? 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to RoninWC on last edited by
    #11957

    @RoninWC said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Just got Movies added for free to Foxtel after threatening to cancel the entire service.

    So the wife and I watched a few things, nothing really worth noting except...

    A movie I've watched at least half a dozen times but it had been a few years since last viewing and one that is definitely in my top 10 list, Groundhog Day.

    Absolute brilliance and still holds up today. A master class by Bill Murray, just nails it.

    Don't need the movie. We are living in it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to RoninWC on last edited by
    #11958

    @RoninWC love that movie.

    Now where is that essay you owe us...😁

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #11959

    Skyfall.

    Still my favourite Bond film of all time (controversy!). Fantastic opening scene, excellent villain, great use of legendary London spots and then the majestic Scottish Highlands for the final stanza. Not too silly on the gadgets, and the Aston.

    And lets not forget Mallory's trousers.

    4.5 shaken out of 5 stirred.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #11960

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Skyfall.

    Still my favourite Bond film of all time (controversy!). Fantastic opening scene, excellent villain, great use of legendary London spots and then the majestic Scottish Highlands for the final stanza. Not too silly on the gadgets, and the Aston.

    And lets not forget Mallory's trousers.

    4.5 shaken out of 5 stirred.

    My fave too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #11961

    Skyfall ending is the one where he goes up inside that big house for a shootout? I thought that was a terrible ending. It was akin to organising to meet your schoolyard nemesis behind the bikesheds for a fight after school.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Movie review thread...
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.