• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Super Rugby 2020

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.5k Posts 78 Posters 111.0k Views
Super Rugby 2020
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #975

    I reckon, under the laws, corporate boxes should be allowed to opne, with max ten in them. If that is going to make some money? But why is that any dif than a restaurant or pub, probably better as there is only 10 per room. Plus one server if required.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #976

    Sunwolves to relocate to Australia as part of new Aussie Super Rugby plan

    Sunwolves to relocate to Australia as part of new Aussie Super Rugby plan

    RA has released a return-to-play strategy with Western Force and possibly Japan's Sunwolves joining the four Australian Super Rugby teams.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #977

    @nzzp said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @booboo said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @Stargazer @Bovidae if crowds are limited or non-existent why bother with a stadium of any size at all?

    You just need to be able to position the cameras and control access.

    Somewhere like Western Springs or Waitakere would suffice wouldn't it?

    You still need the camera positions. Aside from EP and NH, I can't think of many around Auckland that would be suitable (maybe Pukekohe - also close to the airport?)

    Even their training base at Alexandra Park is a possibility, but would need scaffolding, etc. And all of this comes back to how much money EP want to open ๐Ÿ™‚

    NZR and Sky will still want the "product" to look good on TV so they will favour the major stadiums. Although it is the franchises that pay for the use of the stadiums and money is in short supply for them.

    You also need to accommodate the commentators, TMO, etc which isn't always easy at a ground of lesser quality. I've seen first-hand how the commentary at 1st XV games are organised and I don't think that would be ideal for SR, particularly if the weather is shit.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #978

    @Bovidae It will be interesting to see where they'll end up playing in Chch. They do broadcast Farah Palmer Cup games played at Rugby Park, but I can't remember whether that's with sufficient camera angles (as in sufficient for a good SR product).

    I don't know which other options they have other than Orangetheory Stadium and Rugby Park. I assume they won't move games to Trafalgar Park in Nelson, Lansdowne Park in Blenheim or South Canterbury's Alpine Stadium in Timaru, because that would involve too much travel, esp for the visiting team.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #979
    Meanwhile, itโ€™s understood negotiations are ongoing between the Blues and Crusaders over fees to access their usual home grounds of Eden Park and Orangetheory Stadium, respectively.
    
    Stuff has been told the franchises are seeking reduced rates for ground use that take into account the fact they are unable to open their doors to fans. In the meantime their home venues have been left unconfirmed.
    
    Itโ€™s understood it costs the Blues around $30,000 just to open the doors of Eden Park and, understandably, they are seeking a discount on that to let just a few hundred in for a game that is for all intents and purposes made for TV.
    

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/300010477/covid19-localised-sanitised-digitised--its-super-rugby-but-not-as-you-know-it

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #980

    [link text](link url)https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/121488663/sam-whitelock-cleared-to-play-for-the-crusaders-in-super-rugby-restart

    NepiaN StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #981

    @Chris I'm not sure that NZR should be doing this, allowing players outside of squads in (wait can the Chiefs get BBBR? ๐Ÿ˜‰ ) ... or was Whitelock supposed to be a late season arrival for the Crusaders?

    M StargazerS ChrisC 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #982

    @Nepia said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @Chris I'm not sure that NZR should be doing this, allowing players outside of squads in (wait can the Chiefs get BBBR? ๐Ÿ˜‰ ) ... or was Whitelock supposed to be a late season arrival for the Crusaders?

    Yeah cos otherwise players would be totally taking advantage of this in our next pandemic!

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #983

    @Chris So who'll end up on the bench, Strange or Dunshea or Romano? That's assuming Barrett and Whitelock will be in the starting XV. Strange probably has most potential for the future; Romano is in his last season.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #984

    This sets a dangerous precedent. The Highlanders are rumoured to be looking at some of their ex-players from Japan. If a player is added to a squad then surely another player has to be axed if we believe that the salary cap means something.

    BBBR should just sign a short-term NZR contract even if he can't play for the ABs.

    StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #985

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @Nepia said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @Chris I'm not sure that NZR should be doing this, allowing players outside of squads in (wait can the Chiefs get BBBR? ๐Ÿ˜‰ ) ... or was Whitelock supposed to be a late season arrival for the Crusaders?

    Yeah cos otherwise players would be totally taking advantage of this in our next pandemic!

    Weird take, who said anything about players taking advantage of anything.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #986

    @Nepia Whitelock would not have been allowed to play finals in the original Super Rugby competition, but would have been able to play round robin games. I think that was the situation with Messam a few years back. This is a new competition, so I think those rules are out of the window anyway, but I think it's not a deviation from the rules applied in previous years.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #987

    @Bovidae Different situation and letting Whitelock play is not setting a precedent. Those ex-Highlanders are no longer contracted to NZR like Whitelock is and I don't think they should be allowed to play, unless they are replacements for players with season-ending injuries who won't be able to return to play this season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #988

    The take is this is a pandemic and it is not setting a precedent.

    Until the next pandemic anyway

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #989

    setting precedent in an unprecedented situation...one we are unlikely to ever see again, no issues bending the rules, plus wasnt he due to play in the June series anyway?

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #990

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby 2020:

    setting precedent in an unprecedented situation...one we are unlikely to ever see again, no issues bending the rules, plus wasnt he due to play in the June series anyway?

    July - but yeah.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #991

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2020:

    July - but yeah.

    usually a June series isnt it...?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #992

    Elliot Dixon confirms why he definitely won't feature for the Highlanders in 2020

    Elliot Dixon confirms why he definitely won't feature for the Highlanders in 2020

    Exclusive: Rumours have been cropping up that the NZ-only edition of Super Rugby could welcome back some of the countryโ€™s former stars to the fold. Highlanders centurion Elliot Dixon has confirmed why he won't be available for his former side.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #993

    @taniwharugby said in Super Rugby 2020:

    @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2020:

    July - but yeah.

    usually a June series isnt it...?

    Not in the new World Rugby (post RWC19) way, now July so SR finishes rather than them coming in the middle of it.

    All a bit irrelevant at the mo!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by Bovidae
    #994

    The good news is that Whitelock will be fit and primed to play for the North Island. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Super Rugby 2020
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.