Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 134.2k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SnowyS Snowy

    So some are proposing BoP and Hawkes could form a "team"?

    When you are done with that, could you please sort out that Israel Palestine thing too?

    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    @Snowy Oh c'mon Look how well the precedents have gone. Hawkes Bay / Manawatu. Harbour / Wai...….

    OK - Got it now

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • dogmeatD dogmeat

      @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

      Dunno about the other team... The Turds?

      In order to drum up supporters - Albany Free State

      Or Harbour - Already have Waitemata, Kaipara and Mahurangi just add Whangarei, Whangaroa, Rangaunu and Hokianga 😉

      edit: forgot Parengarenga

      Chris B.C Online
      Chris B.C Online
      Chris B.
      wrote on last edited by
      #186

      @dogmeat said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

      @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

      Dunno about the other team... The Turds?

      In order to drum up supporters - Albany Free State

      Or Harbour - Already have Waitemata, Kaipara and Mahurangi just add Whangarei, Whangaroa, Rangaunu and Hokianga 😉

      edit: forgot Parengarenga

      The Harbour Turds - sounds perfect - owning the dodgy sewerage system! 🙂

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • RapidoR Rapido

        @mikey07 said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

        Taranaki and Hawkes bay seem like possibly the only option for a base for a 6th time, happy to proved wrong

        Really? Not Albany?

        M Offline
        M Offline
        mikey07
        wrote on last edited by
        #187

        @Rapido What will there provinces be harbour and Northland? I was thinking of large cities that rarely get games.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Chris B.C Chris B.

          @dogmeat said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          Dunno about the other team... The Turds?

          In order to drum up supporters - Albany Free State

          Or Harbour - Already have Waitemata, Kaipara and Mahurangi just add Whangarei, Whangaroa, Rangaunu and Hokianga 😉

          edit: forgot Parengarenga

          The Harbour Turds - sounds perfect - owning the dodgy sewerage system! 🙂

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Machpants
          wrote on last edited by
          #188

          @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          @dogmeat said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          @Chris-B said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          Dunno about the other team... The Turds?

          In order to drum up supporters - Albany Free State

          Or Harbour - Already have Waitemata, Kaipara and Mahurangi just add Whangarei, Whangaroa, Rangaunu and Hokianga 😉

          edit: forgot Parengarenga

          The Harbour Turds - sounds perfect - owning the dodgy sewerage system! 🙂

          Classy

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Number 10N Number 10

            You would have to say no - that is over 300 players.

            When expansion of Super Rugby was proposed In 2009/10 to start in 2011, both Taranaki and Hawke's Bay made moves to form a sixth Super Rugby squad and NZR said no, they couldn't afford it.

            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT CrusaderA Offline
            ACT Crusader
            wrote on last edited by
            #189

            @Number-10 said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

            You would have to say no - that is over 300 players.

            When expansion of Super Rugby was proposed In 2009/10 to start in 2011, both Taranaki and Hawke's Bay made moves to form a sixth Super Rugby squad and NZR said no, they couldn't afford it.

            A sixth team in a 2011 SR competition may have not been affordable - travel to SA, OZ and all those expenses that add up - but in a beefed up domestic based comp I think it’s possible.

            But then again what that looks like and what it means for NPC are the big unknowns.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

              @Duluth said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

              8 SR teams?

              They might as well go to 10 NPC teams and have a single competition. Everyone plays everyone home and away

              4 teams to drop to heartland or merge with a larger team

              Bye bye Northland Southland Hawkes Bay and Ta$man

              sharkS Offline
              sharkS Offline
              shark
              wrote on last edited by
              #190

              @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

              @Duluth said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

              8 SR teams?

              They might as well go to 10 NPC teams and have a single competition. Everyone plays everyone home and away

              4 teams to drop to heartland or merge with a larger team

              Bye bye Northland Southland Hawkes Bay and Ta$man

              Northland, Southland, Ta$man and Harbour

              sharkS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sharkS shark

                @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                @Duluth said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                8 SR teams?

                They might as well go to 10 NPC teams and have a single competition. Everyone plays everyone home and away

                4 teams to drop to heartland or merge with a larger team

                Bye bye Northland Southland Hawkes Bay and Ta$man

                Northland, Southland, Ta$man and Harbour

                sharkS Offline
                sharkS Offline
                shark
                wrote on last edited by
                #191

                @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                @Duluth said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                8 SR teams?

                They might as well go to 10 NPC teams and have a single competition. Everyone plays everyone home and away

                4 teams to drop to heartland or merge with a larger team

                Bye bye Northland Southland Hawkes Bay and Ta$man

                Northland, Southland, Ta$man and Harbour

                Actually no wait. Northland, Southland, Harbour and Counties

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sharkS Offline
                  sharkS Offline
                  shark
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #192

                  Honestly, if there is any serious chat about a domestic 'Super Rugby' comp, just rebrand the NPC and play it home and away with byes and a six team finals series over 31 weeks from late Feb to October. If there's international play during the season this just provides the opportunity for teams wearing Cambridge blue and maroon and gold to win a couple games.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • sharkS Offline
                    sharkS Offline
                    shark
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #193

                    I'll add to this that I haven't given any thought to funding. But these teams all expect to play around half that season anyway, and the SR franchise monies from NZ Rugby should also be distributed among the 14 sides. On top of that they'd need to also put some dosh into marketing to pimp it up a bit and maybe differentiate it from a traditional NPC further by way of branding, hype, uniform adjustments etc. I think having each team's full complement of All Blacks available for most if not all of the comp would be a big leg up on a current NPC anyway, plus any additional overseas based players who might be available.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • KiwiMurphK Online
                      KiwiMurphK Online
                      KiwiMurph
                      wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
                      #194

                      https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2020/07/rugby-sanzaar-faces-axe-as-details-of-nz-rugby-s-aratipu-review-emerge.html

                      Southern hemisphere rugby could be set for a major shakeup , with doubts emerging over the ongoing existence of SANZAAR. 
                      
                      Sources tell Newshub that the governing body could disband altogether to leave international unions to go it alone, in one of a handful of key recommendations to come from the 'Aratipu' report commissioned by New Zealand Rugby in April. 
                      
                      Newshub can reveal that SANZAAR's days of running the competition appear to be over from next year. 
                      
                      As it stands, Super Rugby involves teams from New Zealand, Australia, South Africa and Argentina. 
                      
                      The draft 'Aratipu' review recommends major changes from 2021 - namely a trans- Ta$man competition with the addition of a team from the Pacific. 
                      
                      Without teams from South Africa and Argentina, SANZAAR's governance of the competition would inevitably cease.
                      
                      The proposed changes to the competition have been welcomed by those involved. 
                      
                      "As long as it keeps the qualities that are making this competition really successful," says Blues coach Leon MacDonald.
                      
                      "Strong teams right across the board, strong games... there's a little bit of a recipe here that as long as they don't deviate too far away from would be well received."
                      
                      It's understood that is what's seen as the missing piece to the Super Rugby puzzle and was identified by review chair Don Mackinnon from the outset.
                      
                      "Do we look at a Heineken cup type playoff model in the short to medium term whereby we're looking at the best of the best playing," Mackinnon queried at the announcement of the review in April. 
                      
                      Crusaders coach Scott Robertson has also expressed his desire for there to be something more for the Super Rugby winners. 
                      
                      "I love the idea of how we can connect up if we have a competition down here and then we can link to the north, that would make it pretty special," Robertson suggested in May.  
                      
                      SANZAAR's sole purpose moving forward would be to oversee the Rugby Championship. 
                      
                      But Tuesday's developments suggest that after quarter of a century, southern hemisphere rugby's united front could soon be over.
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Number 10N Offline
                        Number 10N Offline
                        Number 10
                        wrote on last edited by Number 10
                        #195
                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • TimT Away
                          TimT Away
                          Tim
                          wrote on last edited by Tim
                          #196

                          How would a sixth NZ Super Rugby team look? It'd be based in North Harbour and Northland, and the Blues would be based on Auckland and Counties Manukau. If the region got its NPC players, and a few players from each squad (esp. those with a connection to the region), it might look like this:

                          1. Karl Tu'inukuafe
                          2. James Parsons sharing starting duty with Ricky Riccitelli
                          3. Sione Mafileo
                          4. Josh Goodhue
                          5. Gerard Cowley-Tuioti
                          6. Tom Robinson
                          7. Dillon Hunt
                          8. Teariki Ben-Nicholas/Sione Havili
                          9. Bryn Hall
                          10. Josh Ioane
                          11. Braydon Ennor
                          12. Michael Little
                          13. Jack Goodhue
                          14. Mark Talea
                          15. Shaun Stevenson
                          16. Luteru Tolai
                          17. Reuben O'Neill
                          18. Siate Tokolahi
                          19. Jacob Pierce
                          20. Ethan Roots
                          21. Sam Nock
                          22. Bryn Gatland
                          23. Matt Duffie
                          TimT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #197

                            If there is a Pacific Islands Super Rugby team based in South Auckland, where would they play? Mt Smart and Pukekohe seem to be the only options but neither are in South Auckland (acknowledging what Counties Manukau used to be called).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • KiwiwombleK Online
                              KiwiwombleK Online
                              Kiwiwomble
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #198

                              could they ground share with the Blues? wold make for some big grudge matches

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • pukunuiP pukunui

                                We don’t have the depth to dilute the current 5 teams and maintain the high performance he talks about in that article. Introducing more teams will be a disaster. Poorer quality in the name of expansion does not make for a more entertaining product. We saw that with the endless expansion of super rugby.

                                If the saffa’s are gone and a NZ only comp is not an option then an ANZ comp with the quality of teams kept as high as possible is the only option.

                                NTAN Offline
                                NTAN Offline
                                NTA
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #199

                                @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                We don’t have the depth to dilute the current 5 teams and maintain the high performance he talks about in that article. Introducing more teams will be a disaster. Poorer quality in the name of expansion does not make for a more entertaining product. We saw that with the endless expansion of super rugby.

                                If the saffa’s are gone and a NZ only comp is not an option then an ANZ comp with the quality of teams kept as high as possible is the only option.

                                Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                At the same time, the structures under the Aussie fully pro teams need to change in order to provide more players an opportunity to make a living out of rugby.

                                antipodeanA D 2 Replies Last reply
                                2
                                • antipodeanA Online
                                  antipodeanA Online
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #200

                                  Putting a PI based team in Auckland is a stupid idea. Racially based selection? Exclusion from NZR contracting and New Zealand representation?

                                  Why would NZ do that?

                                  BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • NTAN NTA

                                    @pukunui said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                    We don’t have the depth to dilute the current 5 teams and maintain the high performance he talks about in that article. Introducing more teams will be a disaster. Poorer quality in the name of expansion does not make for a more entertaining product. We saw that with the endless expansion of super rugby.

                                    If the saffa’s are gone and a NZ only comp is not an option then an ANZ comp with the quality of teams kept as high as possible is the only option.

                                    Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                    At the same time, the structures under the Aussie fully pro teams need to change in order to provide more players an opportunity to make a living out of rugby.

                                    antipodeanA Online
                                    antipodeanA Online
                                    antipodean
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #201

                                    @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                    Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                    Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                    NTAN KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
                                    1
                                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                                      @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                      Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTA
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #202

                                      @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                      Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                      Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                      After spending a weekend there in the freezing cold, it is no shock that nobody turns up to Bruce Mausoleum for rugby at night.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                                        @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                        Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                        Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                        KiwiwombleK Online
                                        KiwiwombleK Online
                                        Kiwiwomble
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #203

                                        @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                        @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                        Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                        Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                        can we dumb a team that has won the comp previously? wold feel werid, Canberra doesn't have a AFL team so feels a better location to try and re grow rugby than melbourne

                                        antipodeanA WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                          @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                          Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                          can we dumb a team that has won the comp previously? wold feel werid, Canberra doesn't have a AFL team so feels a better location to try and re grow rugby than melbourne

                                          antipodeanA Online
                                          antipodeanA Online
                                          antipodean
                                          wrote on last edited by antipodean
                                          #204

                                          @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          Super 8 - 5 Kiwi and 3 Aussie teams. It is the only way to proceed with a trans- Ta$man competition IMHO.

                                          Good idea - dump the Brumbies.

                                          can we dumb a team that has won the comp previously? wold feel werid, Canberra doesn't have a AFL team so feels a better location to try and re grow rugby than melbourne

                                          I couldn't care if they were as successful as the Crusaders. It's their public servant supporters I want to see punished. They irritate the piss out of me.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search