Rugby & Concussions / Head Injuries
-
@NTA said in Concussion:
One of our young guys on the weekend copped a nasty one 10 minutes in - ambulance took him to hospital. Grade ?2? diagnosis, though he wasn't really knocked out. I was running touch, and it was the first time I've seen someone take a knee to the head that close, and not be able to get up without staggering.
Shame as he's 22 and built for the front row, but picked up 4 previous concussions playing grid iron so my advice to him: sit the fuck down.
Given that you claimed you were "running" touch I'm unsure about how true the rest is.
In all seriousness that's farked. We're lucky rugby was invented back in the good old days. No way it would be allowed these days. I don't there's a single person who has played the game for any length of time who hasn't sustained a relatively serious injury. I retired from my underwhelming rugby career at 24. I'd been knocked out twice, broke my nose twice, broke my ankle, and tore my hamstring. And that doesn't include stitches and the times some fuckwit tap danced on my head. I'd imagine that was getting off lightly compared to many who have played the game. Rugby is a psycho game which requires zero regard for your own personal safety. Once you start getting worried about injury, it's pretty much game over.
@Rancid-Schnitzel I actually took my 20s off because of the amount of concussions I sustained in my teens my opinion was well I don’t have a professional contract in front of me so why risk my health. A lot of my mates kept playing and are now having to give it away.
-
I was watching the Warriors game last night and the small Bronco halve leapt up and lead with his head into a tackle on Ken Maumalo. It resulted in a concussion with Maumalo bleeding from the nose. The head contact wasn’t deliberate but the technique to my mind is incredibly dangerous - that is, a high tackle ( around the shoulder area ) where the tacking player tackles front on without turning their head. It reminded of a Fijian tackle on Leon MacDonald some years that lead to his concussion issues.
My point with this is that both rugby and league need to add this to their list of issues and start taking concussions seriously.
Interesting that the commentators just referred to the Maumalo tackle as a head clash not worthy of a penalty. Similarly last week week when Peter Hiku stumbled away concussed from a tackle, in the mid week show with blocker Roach and Toovey they both agreed the game didn’t need to be stopped. And, next week Hiku is playing again.
Today there is an article about the great Steve Folkes having brain disease with the suspicion that it was related to concussions from his playing days.
It’s a difficult issue in contact sports, but I am not sure that the games are doing all they should to look after players - and some of the attitudes of those involved are archaic.
-
I was watching the Warriors game last night and the small Bronco halve leapt up and lead with his head into a tackle on Ken Maumalo. It resulted in a concussion with Maumalo bleeding from the nose. The head contact wasn’t deliberate but the technique to my mind is incredibly dangerous - that is, a high tackle ( around the shoulder area ) where the tacking player tackles front on without turning their head. It reminded of a Fijian tackle on Leon MacDonald some years that lead to his concussion issues.
My point with this is that both rugby and league need to add this to their list of issues and start taking concussions seriously.
Interesting that the commentators just referred to the Maumalo tackle as a head clash not worthy of a penalty. Similarly last week week when Peter Hiku stumbled away concussed from a tackle, in the mid week show with blocker Roach and Toovey they both agreed the game didn’t need to be stopped. And, next week Hiku is playing again.
Today there is an article about the great Steve Folkes having brain disease with the suspicion that it was related to concussions from his playing days.
It’s a difficult issue in contact sports, but I am not sure that the games are doing all they should to look after players - and some of the attitudes of those involved are archaic.
@kev The NRL in my opinion has very little regard for their athletes, I read the story in the Sydney Morning herald about Steve Folkes, you would think there would be some sort of outrage or at least an effort to acknowledge what is happening in the game.
I saw a very big hit in the Manly v Rabbits game, looked spectacular on first impressions, and the director could not wait for a stoppage soon enough to show the contact , the reality was there was no arms, just a shoulder into the chest which snapped the head back..
Here’s a novel idea, how about future proofing your game for people play it in the future, maybe even some of them will be your grandchildren. -
Don't know where else to post this, so I'm posting it here.
-
Don't know where else to post this, so I'm posting it here.
@Stargazer said in Concussion:
Don't know where else to post this, so I'm posting it here.
How do the injury rates and long term implications of said injuries compare with the general population?
Lifespan of elite athletes v general population?
Without that data this study is meaningless.
It's like saying skydiving is more dangerous than chess.
-
Don't know where else to post this, so I'm posting it here.
@Stargazer It would be nice if these researchers would just fuck off and find something else to complain about.
-
Don't want to be sore later in life? Don't play. Pretty simple.
FFS would someone just hurry up and get to the inevitable conclusion of these "studies" and just say life is bad for your health, and recommend immediate death?
-
Don't want to be sore later in life? Don't play. Pretty simple.
FFS would someone just hurry up and get to the inevitable conclusion of these "studies" and just say life is bad for your health, and recommend immediate death?
@mariner4life said in Concussion:
Don't want to be sore later in life? Don't play. Pretty simple.
FFS would someone just hurry up and get to the inevitable conclusion of these "studies" and just say life is bad for your health, and recommend immediate death?
Well, pretty much everybody who has died lived first. Reasonably strong correlation.
-
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
-
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
@Higgins said in Concussion:
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
You could just turn the field 90 degrees and play sideline to sideline. Plenty of width. Think of the entertainment value in all those tries.
-
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
@Higgins said in Concussion:
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
I've heard literally thousands of ideas to improve rugby, but never this one. Which is funny because it makes a tonne of sense in a hypothetical world. You'd only need to widen the field by 5m on either side.
In the real world it's a complete non-starter, but that's besides the point.
-
@Higgins said in Concussion:
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
You could just turn the field 90 degrees and play sideline to sideline. Plenty of width. Think of the entertainment value in all those tries.
@pukunui said in Concussion:
@Higgins said in Concussion:
Rather than reducing the number of players why not just make the size of the field larger to accommodate the increase in players sizes and speeds that have occurred over the last hundred years.
You could just turn the field 90 degrees and play sideline to sideline. Plenty of width. Think of the entertainment value in all those tries.
Yup and make kicks the same as passes, backwards only - what fun!
-
They should definitely reduce player numbers to 13 per side I reckon. And ditch scrums (too much power weight force etc) and line outs (scary heights). Rucks certainly have to go, probably mauls as well, anything can happen in those things.
Maybe they should also alternate possession every now and then, I'm sure having to tackle for extended periods doesn't help with fatigue etc.
-
They should definitely reduce player numbers to 13 per side I reckon. And ditch scrums (too much power weight force etc) and line outs (scary heights). Rucks certainly have to go, probably mauls as well, anything can happen in those things.
Maybe they should also alternate possession every now and then, I'm sure having to tackle for extended periods doesn't help with fatigue etc.
@voodoo said in Concussion:
They should definitely reduce player numbers to 13 per side I reckon. And ditch scrums (too much power weight force etc) and line outs (scary heights). Rucks certainly have to go, probably mauls as well, anything can happen in those things.
Maybe they should also alternate possession every now and then, I'm sure having to tackle for extended periods doesn't help with fatigue etc.
Sounds like a sensible sport with no issues of injuries or concussions (or moronic players doing stupid shit because they lack brains), the way ahead for Union
-
They should definitely reduce player numbers to 13 per side I reckon. And ditch scrums (too much power weight force etc) and line outs (scary heights). Rucks certainly have to go, probably mauls as well, anything can happen in those things.
Maybe they should also alternate possession every now and then, I'm sure having to tackle for extended periods doesn't help with fatigue etc.
@voodoo said in Concussion:
They should definitely reduce player numbers to 13 per side I reckon. And ditch scrums (too much power weight force etc) and line outs (scary heights). Rucks certainly have to go, probably mauls as well, anything can happen in those things.
Maybe they should also alternate possession every now and then, I'm sure having to tackle for extended periods doesn't help with fatigue etc.
Give it a new name
-
They should definitely reduce player numbers to 13 per side I reckon. And ditch scrums (too much power weight force etc) and line outs (scary heights). Rucks certainly have to go, probably mauls as well, anything can happen in those things.
Maybe they should also alternate possession every now and then, I'm sure having to tackle for extended periods doesn't help with fatigue etc.
-
From Peter FitzSimons who is on a bit of a crusade about concussion - only quoted part of the article, but when we're talking red cards for contact to the head, this is what is being targeted:
...
A couple of weeks ago, I agreed to help out Dr Rowena Mobbs of Macquarie University, who is one of the guiding forces of the National Repetitive Head Trauma Initiative, to research the impact of repeated concussions and sub-concussive impacts in sport - and ideally find a way forward to reduce that impact.
My contribution would be to interview a couple of former sportsmen about the effect multiple concussions had had on their lives since their sporting career was over.
It went ahead, and one of the interviewees was 40-year-old Michael Lipman, a graduate of St Joseph’s College and former professional rugby player whose career included ten Tests for England on the flank as well as a couple of years for the Melbourne Rebels.
He came with his wife and business partner, Frances, who is also the mother of their two young children. She had also agreed to be interviewed. In the course of his career, Lipman was knocked out a staggering 30 times. He noted to me that he was part of a culture whereby “if I wasn’t completely knocked out, I played on.”
...
And now to the shocking part.
“Michael had a lot of cognitive tests, and he had a score of 77 out of 100, and I thought, 'That sounds awesome ...' I looked it up, and it was actually really concerning, because it was actually at the stage of mild dementia. And I am like, wow, this is what we are dealing with, and Michael’s only 40 years old.”
...
-
From Peter FitzSimons who is on a bit of a crusade about concussion - only quoted part of the article, but when we're talking red cards for contact to the head, this is what is being targeted:
...
A couple of weeks ago, I agreed to help out Dr Rowena Mobbs of Macquarie University, who is one of the guiding forces of the National Repetitive Head Trauma Initiative, to research the impact of repeated concussions and sub-concussive impacts in sport - and ideally find a way forward to reduce that impact.
My contribution would be to interview a couple of former sportsmen about the effect multiple concussions had had on their lives since their sporting career was over.
It went ahead, and one of the interviewees was 40-year-old Michael Lipman, a graduate of St Joseph’s College and former professional rugby player whose career included ten Tests for England on the flank as well as a couple of years for the Melbourne Rebels.
He came with his wife and business partner, Frances, who is also the mother of their two young children. She had also agreed to be interviewed. In the course of his career, Lipman was knocked out a staggering 30 times. He noted to me that he was part of a culture whereby “if I wasn’t completely knocked out, I played on.”
...
And now to the shocking part.
“Michael had a lot of cognitive tests, and he had a score of 77 out of 100, and I thought, 'That sounds awesome ...' I looked it up, and it was actually really concerning, because it was actually at the stage of mild dementia. And I am like, wow, this is what we are dealing with, and Michael’s only 40 years old.”
...
@NTA Why would Fitzsimons need to interview people? We can see the effect of the French belting him in his articles.
