• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #610

    @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Where was Twiggy when FirePower wouldn't pay its bills?

    2009? Dunno.

    Is paying bills now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #611

    how much does teh Force cost now compared to what a full SuperTT Force would cost?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by NTA
    #612

    The Twiggy thing is a mixture of three things:

    1. He's an opportunist fluffybunny;
    2. WA is known for having a wild mistrust of people "over east"; and
    3. Twiggy combining both things to flog a dead horse and make some mileage out of it.

    If we were demonstrably capable of keeping players here with a 5th team, and introducing measures that allowed teams to rise in competitiveness, then I'd say 5 teams would be workable.

    As it is, the Force have been plucky, but are hardly a walk-up start. They're an important development resource I think.

    Coaching remains a big issue. Oh well and all the fucking connective tissue below that.

    If you offer players the opportunity to live and work in Sydney then why the fuck would they take Perth?

    antipodeanA KiapK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #613

    @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    If you offer players the opportunity to live and work in Sydney then why the fuck would they take Perth?

    Sunsets?

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiapK Offline
    KiapK Offline
    Kiap
    replied to NTA on last edited by Kiap
    #614

    @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    If you offer players the opportunity to live and work in Sydney then why the fuck would they take Perth?

    Sydney is only Sydney east of the Anzac bridge, Nick. Everything else is "West".

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    how much does teh Force cost now compared to what a full SuperTT Force would cost?

    Probably around half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #615

    drinking piss in Perth costs even more than it does in Sydney.

    I don't know what the coke and rub-and-tug prices are like though

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #616

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Kirwan this is what i was going to say, im getting sick of seeing "Overseas All Balcks XV" on social media

    Me too. The younger generation really can’t spell these days.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #617

    @Billy-Tell younger generation? thank you!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #618

    @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean who's going to be mid-table and bring in heaps of cash? Maybe if you invite the Japanese national team but otherwise im drawing blanks.

    That's why suggested the Brave Blossoms: 'If Argentina the Jaguares could play SR, why not the Brave Blossoms?'

    That’s actually a really good idea. The Japanese national team would actually be a quality addition to the competition.

    This PI team that is getting floated is either going to draw all it’s players from existing Super rugby teams, which is stupid, or it will be severely under strength but filled with PI local talent with the odd NH returnee. No way the guys on big bucks up North will come back in significant numbers for the chance to play for much less $$.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #619

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @shark I think we would at least have the Brumbies in the final four, who were coming second before lockdown.

    But, regardless, i really don't see the issue for you. If you have four finalists isn't that great? you get two home semis and derbies to boot.

    Yeah I'm into it mate. The proof will be in the pudding. Such as the season Australia only got a team into an 8 team finals series on the back of a terribly contrived conference qualification system.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #620

    With say 6 teams (in a 10 team comp) qualifying for finals footy, and the 1/2 spot getting a bye, I could live with a free entry for the first 2 in each of the 2 conferences. The proviso being that all home field advantage is based off the combined points table throughout the finals. If NZ have 5 teams, I couldn't care less about the last of those teams getting a playoff berth.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    wrote on last edited by
    #621

    I'd be disgusted if the fifth and sixth placed teams in a ten team comp made the finals.

    mariner4lifeM voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
    8
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #622

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I'd be disgusted if the fifth and sixth placed teams in a ten team comp made the finals.

    Absolutely this!

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ravens88
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #623

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @antipodean and that why i said 'pipe dream'.

    The same pipe dream that had Argentina play SR...

    The obvious difference being Argentina didn't have a thriving club competition awash with cash.

    Argentina is unique amongst Tier 1 nation, in that its best Club competitions are Amateur. Biggest one being URBA based in Buenos Aires

    Unión de Rugby de Buenos Aires - Wikipedia

    Unión de Rugby de Buenos Aires - Wikipedia

    Moreover the UAR has encouraged its played to head overseas
    Likes of Kremer, Petti, Orlando etc have already left Jaguares
    Quesada gone to Stade Francais

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ravens88
    replied to pukunui on last edited by
    #624

    @pukunui said in ['Super Rugby' 2021]*

    That’s actually a really good idea. The Japanese national team would actually be a quality addition to the competition.

    This PI team that is getting floated is either going to draw all it’s players from existing Super rugby teams, which is stupid, or it will be severely under strength but filled with PI local talent with the odd NH returnee. No way the guys on big bucks up North will come back in significant numbers for the chance to play for much less $$.

    Seen alot of chat about a PI team but don't get the appeal or sense

    Better to have a 10 team TT comp Each team has Fijian, Tongan & Samoan player in matchday 23

    30 players getting high level footy off the bat
    Have World Rugby chip with paying the salary

    Japs involvement also seems another dead on arrival proposition Top League will not let idea succeed just like Sunwolves Multinational companies pay big $$$ for their players

    Jaguares showed Japs how to do things....

    I want Japan & Fiji in expanded Rugby Championships

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to ravens88 on last edited by gt12
    #625

    @ravens88 said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @pukunui said in ['Super Rugby' 2021]*

    That’s actually a really good idea. The Japanese national team would actually be a quality addition to the competition.

    This PI team that is getting floated is either going to draw all it’s players from existing Super rugby teams, which is stupid, or it will be severely under strength but filled with PI local talent with the odd NH returnee. No way the guys on big bucks up North will come back in significant numbers for the chance to play for much less $$.

    Seen alot of chat about a PI team but don't get the appeal or sense

    Better to have a 10 team TT comp Each team has Fijian, Tongan & Samoan player in matchday 23. 30 players getting high level footy off the bat

    Have World Rugby chip with paying the salary

    Japs involvement also seems another dead on arrival proposition Top League will not let idea succeed just like Sunwolves Multinational companies pay big $$$ for their players

    Jaguares showed Japs how to do things....

    I want Japan & Fiji in expanded Rugby Championships

    That'll do a lot for developing the midfield backs, wingers, m and loose forwards for the island teams. They really need more talent there.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ravens88
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #626

    @gt12

    I don't get your point...

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to ravens88 on last edited by nzzp
    #627

    @ravens88 said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @gt12

    I don't get your point...

    @gt12 is saying that if you do that, you get people playing to their strengths, and not fixing their weaknesses. There are advantages, but it isn't an easy path to success.

    One of the things a PI team (or the other option ) solves is the problem with administration in the islands. Generalism, but they seem to suffer from patronage and poor choices around funds (that's as delicate as I can be), where an NZ based team should be focussed on rugby and coaching.

    Edit: for clarity, lots of great outside backs, some midfield backs, few to no locks and props

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to shark on last edited by
    #628

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I'd be disgusted if the fifth and sixth placed teams in a ten team comp made the finals.

    You're using the term "finals" pretty loosely though. No different to top 8 in NRL. Shit, the top 16 make the NBA play-offs!

    And yes, I understand the difference in team numbers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by voodoo
    #629

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @shark said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    I'd be disgusted if the fifth and sixth placed teams in a ten team comp made the finals.

    Absolutely this!

    Why would you care? In the hypocritical case that the Blues say came 3rd [amended] , and they then had a home playoff QF against the 6th finishing Reds, that should just be extra revenue for them. If they can't get up against them at home then that's their issue.

    RapidoR mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    0

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.