NZ v Australia Test #2

[NTA]

<p>Wasted their reviews. Anyone see a hawkeye of that LBW shout?</p>

[MN5]

<p>Everything about Watling is tenacious right down to his mo. Makes him look like a WWII fighter pilot.</p>

[NTA]

<p>Cricinfo just updated for me - inside edge</p>

[Godder]

They get them back at 80 overs, so it's not a big deal.

[No Quarter]

Kane gone for 97. Boy did he deserve a hundred. Game over.

[taniwharugby]

<p>look a fat lady....</p>

[No Quarter]

Yep Southee gone 2nd ball.

[Virgil]

[attachment=1981:ImageUploadedByTapatalk1456188232.296944.jpg]

[Paekakboyz]

<p>ffs Kane!! the end is nigh </p>

[Virgil]

Maybe if we acted more like fluffybunnies more often we would win more tests...

[taniwharugby]

<p>at least they have to make them put their kit on and bat again...</p>

[MN5]

<p>Aw shit son........well we all knew we were gone the moment Williamson got dismissed, didn't matter what time of day it happened.</p>

[Donsteppa]

<p>Southee batting #8 in a test :rofl:</p>

[MN5]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="560167" data-time="1456188659">
<div>
<p>Southee batting #8 in a test :rofl:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Who else would you have there ?</p>

[Donsteppa]

<p>Overreacting Kiwis, too <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/australia-v-new-zealand-second-cricket-test-josh-hazlewood-blows-up-over-umpires-20160223-gn0z3h.html'>http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/australia-v-new-zealand-second-cricket-test-josh-hazlewood-blows-up-over-umpires-20160223-gn0z3h.html</a><br>
 </p>

[Donsteppa]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="560168" data-time="1456188715">
<div>
<p>Who else would you have there ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>In this instance Henry. Otherwise Craig or Santner.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>While Southee can score runs faster, I reckon Boult could occupy the crease longer...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Though Southee's batting is far less relevant than his apparent inconsistency with the ball these days. Did someone mention the idea of  Wasim or Waqar helping out with the bowlers? </p>

[mariner4life]

<p>We are getting fucked really, really hard. </p>

[Donsteppa]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="560171" data-time="1456189016">
<div>
<p>We are getting fucked really, really hard. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yep, outclassed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My outside hopes/dreams of a series win were toast once Taylor and Santner were ruled out. Shame it wasn't a winning note for McCullum to retire on too.</p>

[MN5]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="560170" data-time="1456188933">
<div>
<p>In this instance Henry. Otherwise Craig or Santner.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>While Southee can score runs faster, I reckon Boult could occupy the crease longer...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Though Southee's batting is far less relevant than his apparent inconsistency with the ball these days. Did someone mention the idea of  Wasim or Waqar helping out with the bowlers? </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yeah that was me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I suppose with Southee it depends on the situation, in this case yeah you're right more of a grafter would have been a better bet but it's rearranging deck chairs on the titanic or whatever that clichà is.....</p>

[MN5]

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="560172" data-time="1456189098">
<div>
<p>Yep, outclassed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My outside hopes/dreams of a series win were toast once Taylor and Santner were ruled out. Shame it wasn't a winning note for McCullum to retire on too.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Taylor definitely but Santner ?????</p>