• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #1319

    @Rapido The NZH article: "A proposal has been tabled to run a Pasifika Moana team out of South Auckland which will be funded by a mix of broadcast and sponsorship income and governed by respective representatives from Fiji, Samoa and Tonga."

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1320

    @Machpants Just call them the Purples or something and it all goes away.

    We have already seen how the Crusaders name has been questioned - let's not do it again was the point.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1321

    @Snowy ah gotcha, yeah I totally missed your point, sorry. Not going to happen cos 'positive discrimination' is cool

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1322

    @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Snowy ah gotcha, yeah I totally missed your point, sorry. Not going to happen cos 'positive discrimination' is cool

    Yeah. Racism only goes one way ay.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1323

    @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Basically from picking Foster on, NZR has been a cluster fuck.

    When did Tew leave?

    Not impressed with how NZR have handled the negotiations with SANZAAR. Could come back to bite them (if it hasn't already)

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #1324

    @nzzp was it just before or after the RWC?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Rapido
    #1325

    @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido The NZH article: "A proposal has been tabled to run a Pasifika Moana team out of South Auckland which will be funded by a mix of broadcast and sponsorship income and governed by respective representatives from Fiji, Samoa and Tonga."

    The last thing they want is any governance from Tongan representatives.

    From 5 days ago: https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/426906/tonga-rugby-union-facing-financial-oblivion

    Although it says financial oblivion, it is really governance oblivion. All they need to do is agree a tripartite agreement with World Rugby and Tongan government and the sweet, sweet WR funds tap gets switched back on. Can't even do that. Billy and Mako's Dad won't let anyone in.

    World Rugby is set to pull all funding to TRU if it fails to sign a tripartite agreement to work alongside the Tonga government and global governing body by the end of the day.

    The agreement would see an interim management group take charge of the Union until long-standing governance issues are resolved

    KiwiMurphK M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #1326

    @Rapido Tonga Rugby Union did end up signing the agreement last Friday.

    From an article today:

    The TRU signed a tripartite agreement with World Rugby and the Tonga Government on Friday , after the global governing body had threatened to pull all financial support.
    
    Sep 29, 2020  /  Pacific

    Former Tonga rugby captain questions new TRU governance

    Former Tonga rugby captain questions new TRU governance

    Former 'Ikale Tahi captain Inoke Afeaki is sceptical a new governing arrangement will lead to lasting change for the Tonga Rugby Union.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #1327

    @Rapido I am not saying it is a good idea, just that it is the idea

    Yeah and post Tew, NZR has been a cluster fuck. Come back Steve all is forgiven!

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by Machpants
    #1328

    @KiwiMurph said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido Tonga Rugby Union did end up signing the agreement last Friday.

    From an article today:

    The TRU signed a tripartite agreement with World Rugby and the Tonga Government on Friday , after the global governing body had threatened to pull all financial support.
    
    Sep 29, 2020  /  Pacific

    Former Tonga rugby captain questions new TRU governance

    Former Tonga rugby captain questions new TRU governance

    Former 'Ikale Tahi captain Inoke Afeaki is sceptical a new governing arrangement will lead to lasting change for the Tonga Rugby Union.

    That fuck for that, not for the fluffybunnies that run it, but the hardworking palyers who sacrifice a lot to represent their country/heritage.

    EDIT: Ouch scathing comments in the article

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #1329

    @Machpants said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Rapido I am not saying it is a good idea, just that it is the idea

    Yes. but I'm saying the idea is probably deliberate porkies or half-truth. Putting forward a half-truth solution they know can't be followed through.

    The respective representatives from Fiji, Samoa and Tonga will probably be Pasifika NZers employed by the 'NZRU and private owner partnership' that ends up paying to set this team up / owning it. Not answerable in any way to any of the 3 PI unions.

    So, basically just another NZ super franchise.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #1330

    StargazerS taniwharugbyT WingerW 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1331

    @KiwiMurph Makes sense. How are they supposed to attract enough good players to have a team that will be competitive enough in 2021? There's not enough time. The financial side of it may also be difficult to arrange in such a short time. 2022 would be much better to enter a Pasifika team, esp because there are still so many other things to sort out, too, such as who is going to manage the team, where will they be based, where will they attract their players from etc etc.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1332

    @KiwiMurph see a crossover finals series (maybe finalist or top 2 in each comp) makes more sense than the previously contrived series.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #1333

    @Stargazer said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Makes sense. How are they supposed to attract enough good players to have a team that will be competitive enough in 2021? There's not enough time. The financial side of it may also be difficult to arrange in such a short time. 2022 would be much better to enter a Pasifika team, esp because there are still so many other things to sort out, too, such as who is going to manage the team, where will they be based, where will they attract their players from etc etc.

    Which is why the Asia Pacific Barbarians seem like the most realistic of the PI bids. They said from the beginning that 2021 was impossible so they made a bid for 2022

    The others were way too optimistic

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1334

    @KiwiMurph said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Id forget about the crossover (for 2021) and just continue with what worked this year. Then look at 2022 for a combined competition. With the hope that Aust can by then have 5 teams that are strong enough to compete with the NZ teams

    KiwiMurphK NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Winger on last edited by
    #1335

    @Winger why forget it for 2021? Both NZR and RA could use the extra revenue/product.

    WingerW taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by Winger
    #1336

    @KiwiMurph said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Winger why forget it for 2021? Both NZR and RA could use the extra revenue/product.

    Because it will be boring. And bad for Aussie rugby with NZ teams almost certainly beating the Aussie team.

    I would prefer a bigger knockout crossover competition. Maybe also including the pro 14 (or 16) sides. And if SA only have 4 teams (instead of 6) each team should be stronger so maybe they could win it

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #1337

    @KiwiMurph I'd say with the limited rugby, not to mention no Super Rugby, it'd become a great product to sell.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #1338

    and the top aussie team should be at least competitive, the reds had some get results in pre COVID Super rugby

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.