Tasman v Canterbury
-
@Chris-B You might have to keep talking to yourself throughout this thread. Nearly all of the Canterbury fans have disappeared for the meantime but will be back once they start winning again.
-
I’m still here. Looking forward to the game. A decent lineup for the Cantabs.
Whether I’ll be back tomorrow after 80 minutes is another thing

-
@Chris-B You might have to keep talking to yourself throughout this thread. Nearly all of the Canterbury fans have disappeared for the meantime but will be back once they start winning again.
@African-Monkey I was about to say - @ACT-Crusader is still here! Kudos!!!
I'd actually rather Canterbury didn't get relegated as they are my second team - but, if they can save themselves by beating Auckland, that will do nicely!

-
@Chris-B @ACT-Crusader Hence why I said 'nearly' hahaha. Yes I was thinking of you @ACT-Crusader when writing it.
-
On a more serious note, that Canterbury side should not be where they are. They're light in a couple of areas but their forward pack on paper is still one of the stronger ones in the comp. It's still a good enough side to challenge for the title imo.
-
On a more serious note, that Canterbury side should not be where they are. They're light in a couple of areas but their forward pack on paper is still one of the stronger ones in the comp. It's still a good enough side to challenge for the title imo.
@African-Monkey said in Ta$man v Canterbury:
On a more serious note, that Canterbury side should not be where they are. They're light in a couple of areas but their forward pack on paper is still one of the stronger ones in the comp. It's still a good enough side to challenge for the title imo.
I agree
Depth is the main issue. Still, anything outside a top 3 finish should be considered a failure for that squad
-
@Dice Very poor defence I thought.
-
Canterbury looking good so far.
-
Drummond’s play is all over the show. High passing, poor kicks.
Forward pack going very well.
