Black Caps v Pakistan
-
Peronally I'd like to see us start selecting spinners on their bowling and totally eliminate their batting as anything other than a tie breaking criterion between two equally sjkilled bowlers
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Peronally I'd like to see us start selecting spinners on their bowling and totally eliminate their batting as anything other than a tie breaking criterion between two equally sjkilled bowlers
We normally do, though. Santner 's time in the team is the only time that NZ have had their spinner as the allrounder in my time, and not the best spinner in the country. Well, Harris got a couple of goes as second spinner, actually.
-
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Peronally I'd like to see us start selecting spinners on their bowling and totally eliminate their batting as anything other than a tie breaking criterion between two equally sjkilled bowlers
We normally do, though. Santner 's time in the team is the only time that NZ have had their spinner as the allrounder in my time, and not the best spinner in the country. Well, Harris got a couple of goes as second spinner, actually.
@Rapido said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Peronally I'd like to see us start selecting spinners on their bowling and totally eliminate their batting as anything other than a tie breaking criterion between two equally sjkilled bowlers
We normally do, though. Santner 's time in the team is the only time that NZ have had their spinner as the allrounder in my time, and not the best spinner in the country. Well, Harris got a couple of goes as second spinner, actually.
Daniel Vettori just got triggered reading this
-
One of the problems that developped in the test team is that I don't think either Kane or McCullum had enough faith in any of the spinners to bowl them enough TBH. In McCullum's case, I don't believe he rated any spinner anyway so whoever got selected was on a hiding to nothing. This was exacerabted by the selection of the likes of santner and craig who arre basically seen - as vettori-lites. And let's be honest here, when was the last time Vettori ran through a test side - if my memory serves me well, it was before his batting became essential to make up for an extremely deficient top order
-
One of the problems that developped in the test team is that I don't think either Kane or McCullum had enough faith in any of the spinners to bowl them enough TBH. In McCullum's case, I don't believe he rated any spinner anyway so whoever got selected was on a hiding to nothing. This was exacerabted by the selection of the likes of santner and craig who arre basically seen - as vettori-lites. And let's be honest here, when was the last time Vettori ran through a test side - if my memory serves me well, it was before his batting became essential to make up for an extremely deficient top order
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
One of the problems that developped in the test team is that I don't think either Kane or McCullum had enough faith in any of the spinners to bowl them enough TBH. In McCullum's case, I don't believe he rated any spinner anyway so whoever got selected was on a hiding to nothing. This was exacerabted by the selection of the likes of santner and craig who arre basically seen - as vettori-lites. And let's be honest here, when was the last time Vettori ran through a test side - if my memory serves me well, it was before his batting became essential to make up for an extremely deficient top order
cricinfo confirms you could be right. Looks like he got about a wicket a test in his last few matches which is not good enough.
As you mention his gutsy batting and captaincy made him an absolute champion player ( and this was needed with our diabolical top order ) but it's fair to say the bowling fell away in a big way.
-
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
One of the problems that developped in the test team is that I don't think either Kane or McCullum had enough faith in any of the spinners to bowl them enough TBH. In McCullum's case, I don't believe he rated any spinner anyway so whoever got selected was on a hiding to nothing. This was exacerabted by the selection of the likes of santner and craig who arre basically seen - as vettori-lites. And let's be honest here, when was the last time Vettori ran through a test side - if my memory serves me well, it was before his batting became essential to make up for an extremely deficient top order
cricinfo confirms you could be right. Looks like he got about a wicket a test in his last few matches which is not good enough.
As you mention his gutsy batting and captaincy made him an absolute champion player ( and this was needed with our diabolical top order ) but it's fair to say the bowling fell away in a big way.
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
cricinfo confirms you could be right. Looks like he got about a wicket a test in his last few matches which is not good enough.
As you mention his gutsy batting and captaincy made him an absolute champion player ( and this was needed with our diabolical top order ) but it's fair to say the bowling fell away in a big way.
Mind you he had to basically mollycoddle some of the most injury-prone attacks we had - and he was never a big turner - it was the fact he was a left arm orthodox spinner who was very accurate for long periods over 17 years that got him that haul of wickets - he was a much more game-changing bowler when the batsmen were under pressures of time and pacing ie limited over games.
-
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
cricinfo confirms you could be right. Looks like he got about a wicket a test in his last few matches which is not good enough.
As you mention his gutsy batting and captaincy made him an absolute champion player ( and this was needed with our diabolical top order ) but it's fair to say the bowling fell away in a big way.
Mind you he had to basically mollycoddle some of the most injury-prone attacks we had - and he was never a big turner - it was the fact he was a left arm orthodox spinner who was very accurate for long periods over 17 years that got him that haul of wickets - he was a much more game-changing bowler when the batsmen were under pressures of time and pacing ie limited over games.
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
cricinfo confirms you could be right. Looks like he got about a wicket a test in his last few matches which is not good enough.
As you mention his gutsy batting and captaincy made him an absolute champion player ( and this was needed with our diabolical top order ) but it's fair to say the bowling fell away in a big way.
Mind you he had to basically mollycoddle some of the most injury-prone attacks we had - and he was never a big turner - it was the fact he was a left arm orthodox spinner who was very accurate for long periods over 17 years that got him that haul of wickets - he was a much more game-changing bowler when the batsmen were under pressures of time and pacing ie limited over games.
You've summed him up pretty accurately. When you put it that way he sounds limited which maybe he was but he was still considerably better than any who've come since. A genuine NZ great for sure.....and someone we haven't come close to replacing.
-
Jamieson continues to impress. I will be very interested to see who he manages bowling on this deck - will he be able to get enough bounce to make things difficult - although it was gratifying to see that he is getting up in pace with each test he plays - started around the 127-133kmh mark, now he tends top start around 135-6 kmh and can sustain it for longer
-
Jamieson continues to impress. I will be very interested to see who he manages bowling on this deck - will he be able to get enough bounce to make things difficult - although it was gratifying to see that he is getting up in pace with each test he plays - started around the 127-133kmh mark, now he tends top start around 135-6 kmh and can sustain it for longer
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Jamieson continues to impress. I will be very interested to see who he manages bowling on this deck - will he be able to get enough bounce to make things difficult - although it was gratifying to see that he is getting up in pace with each test he plays - started around the 127-133kmh mark, now he tends top start around 135-6 kmh and can sustain it for longer
Indeed. All these decent innings can't be a fluke.....and obviously he's made a dream start with the ball in his hands too.
-
@SynicBast said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Jamieson continues to impress. I will be very interested to see who he manages bowling on this deck - will he be able to get enough bounce to make things difficult - although it was gratifying to see that he is getting up in pace with each test he plays - started around the 127-133kmh mark, now he tends top start around 135-6 kmh and can sustain it for longer
Indeed. All these decent innings can't be a fluke.....and obviously he's made a dream start with the ball in his hands too.
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Indeed. All these decent innings can't be a fluke.....and obviously he's made a dream start with the ball in his hands too.
I'm liking that he is tailoring his shots to suit the vconditions - Roscoe said the pitch was a little two paced - so accumulation was paramount - Jamieson looks to have that mental discipline required to be satisfied with accruing runs as available rather than forcing the issue.
-
BJ accumulated a much needed 50 to keep things ticking over. I think Jamieson should have a swing now.
-
WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:
*"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.
"That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?
-
WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:
*"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.
"That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?
@Snowy said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:
*"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.
"That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?
When is De Grandholme fit again ?
-
WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:
*"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.
"That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?
@Snowy said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:
I'm not. I'm really not convinced Stead is up to coaching this side. If anything I think he is a handbrake that Williamson is having to deal with for now. He was clueless in Aus and clueless when he went on holiday - he's not intellectually incisive enough to manage the team nor does he have the playing gravitas to persuade me either. Journeyman player - mediocre coach - the Santnav of Team management
-
Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.
With regards to the spinner dilemma. KW isn't the worst in the world when he actually has a go but is captaincy and being the best player enough for him to have on his plate ?
Watling's knack for scoring crucial runs when needed is obviously a big string to his bow but it's still almost a problem in how the side is selected around the 6/7 spots in the order. Do they go for another specialist batsman, shift Watling to 7 and hope that there are guys in the top order to roll the arm over occasionally ?
-
WRT to the spinner selection - I'm still struggling with this from Stead:
*"The toughest squad selection was clearly around the spinner," said coach Gary Stead.
"That basically came down to the balance of the side and with the four-strong pace attack going so nicely we wanted to have a spinning allrounder as an option for that No 7 position."*
A guy that averages 25 (and scored 19 today) is a bowler (who is unlikely to take wickets in NZ).I think that we are living in the past a bit, our top order is so much stronger in NZ (mostly) and our pace bowlers so much fitter that giving them a rest with a spinner isn't really necessary either. So why not an attacking spinner that takes wickets (if one at all)?
-
Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.
With regards to the spinner dilemma. KW isn't the worst in the world when he actually has a go but is captaincy and being the best player enough for him to have on his plate ?
Watling's knack for scoring crucial runs when needed is obviously a big string to his bow but it's still almost a problem in how the side is selected around the 6/7 spots in the order. Do they go for another specialist batsman, shift Watling to 7 and hope that there are guys in the top order to roll the arm over occasionally ?
@MN5 said in Black Caps v Pakistan:
Southee gives the haters more ammo with that innings.
"Haters" = people with a different opinion to me.
Expressing the opinion that he should try just a little harder at his batting ...
transmission interrupted as Wags go... no he doesn't: no ball ... what a delivery though ...
... is hardly hating.
It was a great ball from Yasir though and chance of getting a wicket regardless (non-bouncing yorker) was extremely high.
