Australia v India
-
I have been thinking for a while now that some sort of study around umpire's call would be interesting. I suspect the better teams and players would benefit more.
-
Hazelwood thought the bounce would’ve had it over the stumps but it clips the top of off.
India need 60 odd to win.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader DRS would have had it missing stumps too....
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@ACT-Crusader DRS would have had it missing stumps too....
Fuck settle down there Sachin.
-
Without Warner at the top this Aus batting lineup is pretty weak. Their bowlers did enough to keep them in the game but they've just folded again.
Labuschagne has had a great start but his first class numbers don't suggest he's in the top tier of batsmen, and the rest are very 'meh' apart from Smith. Never thought I'd see so many guys with averages in the 30s in an Australian test top 7.
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@ACT-Crusader DRS would have had it missing stumps too....
Fuck settle down there Sachin.
Jeez didn't take you long to bite.
-
@NTA you don't think better teams or players get the benefit of calls? I reckon it happens at all levels in all sports.
-
@No-Quarter Labuschagne looks the real deal to me. He has a first class average of 43.5 with 15 tons.
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Australia v India:
@NTA you don't think better teams or players get the benefit of calls? I reckon it happens at all levels in all sports.
In cricket, it is probably because better bowlers know when to appeal more often than not, and put the opposition in harder places to resist that appeal.
Let's face it: not like Bangladesh have four blokes thundering in at 135+ rapping blokes on the pads.
-
70 is looking a wee way off...
-
@Crazy-Horse said in Australia v India:
70 is looking a wee way off...
Rahane will show some patience. The two guys out already are in poor touch right now, and the new guy is pretty talented.
-
-
