• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.2k Posts 51 Posters 46.5k Views
Black Caps v Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by Snowy
    #525

    As @siam says first point of contact.

    I like Baz as commentator. Anyway the law (no idea when they changed it, but it had me puzzled when it happened as it looked wrong under the old law):

    21.5.1 the bowler’s back foot must land within and not touching the return crease appertaining to his/her stated mode of delivery.

    Edit: What @dogmeat said.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #526

    Told yas. That is all.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #527

    Wagner out of the second test.

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #528

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Told yas. That is all.

    Told us what?

    Santner could get 2 (very much) tail enders out in the the last session of play on a turning wicket?

    2 for 59. Game would probably have been over a lot earlier if he hadn't bowled 19.3 overs.

    One of the first guys picked for white ball cricket, not an option for red ball. Don't think his 19 as an "allrounder" really helped either.

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #529

    @Godder said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Wagner out of the second test.

    So who comes in? Henry? That should give us somebody else to moan about besides Satnav.

    SiamS SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #530

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Godder said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Wagner out of the second test.

    So who comes in? Henry? That should give us somebody else to moan about besides Satnav.

    Some mention of Nuttall?
    Nuttall? Nuttall? Anyone got oil on Nuttall?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #531

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Godder said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Wagner out of the second test.

    So who comes in? Henry? That should give us somebody else to moan about besides Satnav.

    CDG was in the nets at the Mount wasn't he? His record in Chch is quite good I think and it isn't generally a turner. If they insist on an "all rounder"...

    Is Ferg still broken as well?

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #532

    @Snowy I read an article where they (Stead I think) were suggesting a like for like replacement. Names mentioned in the article were Henry, Brackwell and Nuttall.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #533

    Henry has only just come back from injury so could be underdone. And he isn't that effective as a 3rd or 4th bowler.

    They might just use Mitchell in that role which will also strengthen the batting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Crazy Horse on last edited by
    #534

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Snowy I read an article where they (Stead I think) were suggesting a like for like replacement. Names mentioned in the article were Henry, Brackwell and Nuttall.

    None of those seem "like for like" for me but from what you have read that is probable.

    @Bovidae might also have it.

    Is there any news on CDG?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #535

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by Rapido
    #536

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Snowy I read an article where they (Stead I think) were suggesting a like for like replacement. Names mentioned in the article were Henry, Brackwell and Nuttall.

    They aren't like for like. 2 are new ball bowlers exclusively (Henry and Nuttall). At least Bracewell has form as old ball bowler, but that is circa 5 year history now.

    I'd suggest Tickner. As potential to be effective with old ball compared to domestic contemporaries. But no one is Wagner.

    Need to go green at Hagley. Really green. If we are selecting an extra new ball bowler.

    SnowyS Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #537

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Need to go green at Hagley. Really green.

    We might even win a toss.

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #538

    @Snowy

    No we wont. And we all know it.

    But surely we're due ....?

    Needs to be green enough a to make Henry who has been ineffective at test level first change, be effective 2nd change in 2nd innings of match.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Snowy on last edited by Rapido
    #539

    @Snowy said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Told yas. That is all.

    Told us what?

    Santner could get 2 (very much) tail enders out in the the last session of play on a turning wicket?

    2 for 59. Game would probably have been over a lot earlier if he hadn't bowled 19.3 overs.

    One of the first guys picked for white ball cricket, not an option for red ball. Don't think his 19 as an "allrounder" really helped either.

    Yes, that's a perfectly adequate performance I want. Allrounder who may be effective if our 4 good seamers are getting nothing. Got some last day wickets when bouncer barrage on a pudding is ineffective

    Not Daryl Mitchell. Our 4 good seamers are ineffective at the moment on this pitch, I wish we had a bowler who bowls like them 4 but not as fast and not as good, to change it up.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #540

    @Rapido As a bowler I see you one Santner and raise you one Williamson (or anyone else for that matter).

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #541

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Snowy I read an article where they (Stead I think) were suggesting a like for like replacement. Names mentioned in the article were Henry, Brackwell and Nuttall.

    They aren't like for like. 2 are new ball bowlers exclusively (Henry and Nuttall). At least Bracewell has form as old ball bowler, but that is circa 5 year history now.

    I'd suggest Tickner. As potential to be effective with old ball compared to domestic contemporaries. But no one is Wagner.

    Need to go green at Hagley. Really green. If we are selecting an extra new ball bowler.

    I just re-read the article and this is what Stead said
    "I think it's likely it will be a like-for-like replacement, so you imagine it is going to be a pace bowler."

    The author of the article then threw up the three names.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #542

    @Snowy
    Williamson chucks .

    To make sure he doesnt chuck, he needs to put in more time to his bowling practice loads than his body can now handle . His bowling is about as currently good as Baz's keeping. Its history.

    SnowyS rotatedR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #543

    @Rapido said in Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @Snowy
    Williamson chucks .

    To make sure he doesnt chuck, he needs to put in more time to his bowling practice loads than his body can now handle . His bowling is about as currently good as Baz's keeping. Its history.

    Murali chucked, didn't stop him.

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #544

    @Snowy

    ICC did stop Kane. He failed. Officially chucked. He passed the retest after remodeling
    But he has had Injury problems preventing him putting in the overs. He isn't comfortable or have muscle memory .

    He doesnt chuck them like its 2013.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps v Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.