• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Movie review thread...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
19.8k Posts 163 Posters 3.2m Views
Movie review thread...
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #13539

    @Kiwiwomble said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 really? first person ive met to say that

    We’ve never met

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #13540

    @MN5 ok, sorry, hopefully the correction fixes things

    I will clarify, the only people I have heard that even saw it were Blade Runner fans to start with and they all seemed to like how well is has an almost identical vibe as the original, other than the CGI they could have been filmed back to back

    but then I know a lot of people who never bothered to see it and maybe they would have seen more faults

    MN5M NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #13541

    @Kiwiwomble said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 ok, sorry, hopefully the correction fixes things

    I will clarify, the only people I have heard that even saw it were Blade Runner fans to start with and they all seemed to like how well is has an almost identical vibe as the original, other than the CGI they could have been filmed back to back

    but then I know a lot of people who never bothered to see it and maybe they would have seen more faults

    Haha yes well done 🙂

    I think Blade Runner 2049 probably needs multiple viewings to appreciate it. The first sure did.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Online
    KruseK Online
    Kruse
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #13542

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Speaking of which I made myself sit through Blade Runner 2049 again. Definitely made a bit more sense and I enjoyed it more. Beautifully shot but still full of flaws......

    I'm giving it a rewatch right now... and I'm sure I've watched it twice before, but I swear... I don't remember a single fucking thing about this 'plot'.
    I am starting to suspect that on both prior viewings, I got as far as the first Ana de Armas sighting, and then slunk off to bed for a masty, and post-masty nap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #13543

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @Kiwiwomble said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 ok, sorry, hopefully the correction fixes things

    I will clarify, the only people I have heard that even saw it were Blade Runner fans to start with and they all seemed to like how well is has an almost identical vibe as the original, other than the CGI they could have been filmed back to back

    but then I know a lot of people who never bothered to see it and maybe they would have seen more faults

    Haha yes well done 🙂

    I think Blade Runner 2049 probably needs multiple viewings to appreciate it. The first sure did.

    I don't remember much about the original but I really enjoyed BR2049 at first watch

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #13544

    Richard Jewell was the best new release I've seen for a while. Clint's still got it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #13545

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #13546

    @Kiwiwomble said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 ok, sorry, hopefully the correction fixes things

    I will clarify, the only people I have heard that even saw it were Blade Runner fans to start with and they all seemed to like how well is has an almost identical vibe as the original, other than the CGI they could have been filmed back to back

    but then I know a lot of people who never bothered to see it and maybe they would have seen more faults

    I actually think 2049 is a better film than the original. I think I've said before on here I think the original is overrated and that I find the tears in the rain scene to be comical.

    @Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Richard Jewell was the best new release I've seen for a while. Clint's still got it.

    I think got it back is probably more apt, he's a bit hit and miss lately. The Mule and that Paris one were pretty average to shit. But he got to put his boot into evil big govt Feds in Richard Jewell which might explain the increase in quality. 😉

    @Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    alt text

    Unmitigated bollocks that even the lesbo scene between those two couldn't redeem. My Lynch fanboi mates think it's the movie version of the Mona Lisa though.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #13547

    @Nepia said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Unmitigated bollocks that even the lesbo scene between those two couldn't redeem. My Lynch fanboi mates think it's the movie version of the Mona Lisa though.

    You are correct about Eastwood, but you are clearly a complete philistine based on your opinion of Lynch!

    NepiaN MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #13548

    @Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @Nepia said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Unmitigated bollocks that even the lesbo scene between those two couldn't redeem. My Lynch fanboi mates think it's the movie version of the Mona Lisa though.

    You are correct about Eastwood, but you are clearly a complete philistine based on your opinion of Lynch!

    I like a lot of Lynch movies (and original Twin Peaks), but he disappeared too far up his ass on that one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #13549

    @Tim said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @Nepia said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Unmitigated bollocks that even the lesbo scene between those two couldn't redeem. My Lynch fanboi mates think it's the movie version of the Mona Lisa though.

    You are correct about Eastwood, but you are clearly a complete philistine based on your opinion of Lynch!

    I’m probably Clints biggest fan in terms of his acting but even I admit some of the stuff he directs is a bit hit or miss.....still, he wasn’t to know Kevin Spacey was a sex pest I guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #13550

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #13551

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #13552

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    I need to do another Tarantino marathon to assess where it stands....I’ve also only seen OUATIH once, that needs to be rectified

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #13553

    DE29DBC5-7E32-4BA2-B34C-4BDFA7EA8811.jpeg

    Only in a Movie like Commando can you fire rockets from a rocket launcher with no rockets

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #13554

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    I need to do another Tarantino marathon to assess where it stands....I’ve also only seen OUATIH once, that needs to be rectified

    Pulp Fiction is #1. You just need to decide on the minor placings

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #13555

    @canefan said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    I need to do another Tarantino marathon to assess where it stands....I’ve also only seen OUATIH once, that needs to be rectified

    Pulp Fiction is #1. You just need to decide on the minor placings

    Not necessarily. Inglorious basterds, Django and Jackie Brown are outstanding.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #13556

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @canefan said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    I need to do another Tarantino marathon to assess where it stands....I’ve also only seen OUATIH once, that needs to be rectified

    Pulp Fiction is #1. You just need to decide on the minor placings

    Not necessarily. Inglorious basterds, Django and Jackie Brown are outstanding.

    Oh please. Django is excellent but nowhere near the ground breaking class of PF. The other 2 are leagues away especially Jackie Brown which I don't rate at all. Reservoir Dogs is miles better than those 2

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #13557

    @voodoo said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @canefan said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    I need to do another Tarantino marathon to assess where it stands....I’ve also only seen OUATIH once, that needs to be rectified

    Pulp Fiction is #1. You just need to decide on the minor placings

    Not necessarily. Inglorious basterds, Django and Jackie Brown are outstanding.

    Oh please. Django is excellent but nowhere near the ground breaking class of PF. The other 2 are leagues away especially Jackie Brown which I don't rate at all. Reservoir Dogs is miles better than those 2

    Yeah PF is probably still number one but again, loved the others I mentioned too. It’s not as straightforward as you think.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #13558

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @voodoo said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @canefan said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MN5 said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    @MajorRage said in Re: Movie review thread...:

    Pulp Fiction

    I'm almost alone these days when I say I'm not a Tarantino fan. Struggled to stay awake in so many of his "masterpieces". But, like everything, there is an exception. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies that gets better every single time you watch it. The lines, the delivery, Samuel L at his astonishing best. Best parts are the story with Travolta / Thurman.

    5 Pretty Fucking Fars out of 5 From Being Ok's.

    I need to do another Tarantino marathon to assess where it stands....I’ve also only seen OUATIH once, that needs to be rectified

    Pulp Fiction is #1. You just need to decide on the minor placings

    Not necessarily. Inglorious basterds, Django and Jackie Brown are outstanding.

    Oh please. Django is excellent but nowhere near the ground breaking class of PF. The other 2 are leagues away especially Jackie Brown which I don't rate at all. Reservoir Dogs is miles better than those 2

    Yeah PF is probably still number one but again, loved the others I mentioned too. It’s not as straightforward as you think.

    Probably right. All those movies have much in common, the great acting, incredible scripts, inherent coolness", awesome soundtracks. I just think the thing that sets PF apart is that it's just so fucking CLEVER. Conceptually it was so unique, when you came out of the cinema you were just "what the fuck did I just see???".

    I think the absence of social media helped also, as I had no clue what I was in for. And it probably wasn't until my 2nd or 3rd viewing when I realised how special it was.

    MN5M canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    2

Movie review thread...
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.