Australia v India
-
@Siam said in Australia v India:
@barbarian 300 minimum you think?
Have to balance the runs against the clock. If this wicket suddenly turned into a minefield we need enough sessions to bowl them out.
Which on the evidence, is something more than 4
-
-
You have to be careful though, you don't want to go too hard too early, and suddenly we're 4/120.
It depends a bit on the pitch and the forecast, but I'd think they would look to set a target of 300, and ideally get 20 overs at them before stumps tonight.
-
@barbarian the delicate balance is, the same 4 bowlers needing to come out again after only a little rest, after a short turnaround, having played every test in the series.
-
Excellent ball to get Harris. Tricky length and Harris gets caught with his hands up on the bounce.
-
@mariner4life said in Australia v India:
@barbarian the delicate balance is, the same 4 bowlers needing to come out again after only a little rest, after a short turnaround, having played every test in the series.
Cummins in particular looked tired during that first innings.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Australia v India:
@mariner4life said in Australia v India:
@barbarian the delicate balance is, the same 4 bowlers needing to come out again after only a little rest, after a short turnaround, having played every test in the series.
Cummins in particular looked tired during that first innings.
just checked, he's bowled 138 overs of flat out pace this series. the other two have bowled 122. Lyon has 156.
imagine the state if India hadn't completely capitulated one innings
-
Here comes India...
-
-
Marnus calling for another review that goes down the toilet
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Australia v India:
Marnus calling for another review that goes down the toilet
Watto!!
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@NTA said in Australia v India:
I'd like to see these two have a crack once they get to 50
That's some jinx.
I am not the devil, but I am his local representative.
-
One will get you two.
-
-
@Donsteppa said in Australia v India:
Siraj scything though the Australian top order and Matthew Wade.
spot on - 123/4 and suddenly the equation looks very different. Smith still at the crease - get him soon, and Aus will start to sweat
-
Warne fluffing Wade made it all the more sweet
-
i am just astounded that Matthew Wade continues to be an ever present in an Australian test side. He is the sort of player we would have picked in the dark years, and stuck with for ages.
Can't score runs. Fields alright, but calls for dumb shit reviews. The weakest player in the XI
