• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NH International Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
3.2k Posts 89 Posters 302.4k Views
NH International Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mantissanetM Offline
    mantissanetM Offline
    mantissanet
    wrote on last edited by
    #2256

    Dunno how act crusader came into that last reply...it’s all mine😂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #2257

    Biggest choke since The Boston Strangler

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by Crucial
    #2258

    @bones said in NH International Rugby:

    Now Genge thinks it's tough to talk smack to Sexton and continue on even after the ref told him to calm down. What a mong.

    Was that just after this bit of MMA?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #2259

    Alun Wyn has equalled Richie's test caps for his nation now, even without his lions caps

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #2260

    24D7D7B3-B7BC-4EAF-A5BE-9B950E4646C9.jpeg

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    GibbonRib
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #2261

    @sparky said in NH International Rugby:

    Welsh discipline went to absolute shit in the last 15 minutes. 14 penalties were the killer.

    Ollivon immense for France.

    I was not expecting that. I was quite prepared for the idea that we might lose because France just outplayed us, but not this way. Discipline has been such a strong point for Wales for a long time, so to see it unravelling was quite a shock.

    Hard to take as a fan. Can only imagine the mood in the team right now.

    But credit to France, epic game, and they kept on coming and asking the questions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #2262

    @crucial such a loser eh.

    That first reply is hilarious though. Rugby should have match bans!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #2263

    So....just me that's worried what tech the TMOs are being given to watch replays on?

    Barnes calls the Rees-Zammit try attempt as grounded against the base of the corner flag, when it appears clear it's grounded on the dead ball line past the flag. I also thought it was clear that France held up the Welsh player for the other call too.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy JaffyD Offline
    Daffy Jaffy
    wrote on last edited by
    #2264

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    GibbonRib
    replied to Bones on last edited by GibbonRib
    #2265

    @bones said in NH International Rugby:

    So....just me that's worried what tech the TMOs are being given to watch replays on?

    Barnes calls the Rees-Zammit try attempt as grounded against the base of the corner flag, when it appears clear it's grounded on the dead ball line past the flag. I also thought it was clear that France held up the Welsh player for the other call too.

    I think with the second one you're referring to, the on field call was try, so they needed conclusive proof that it never touched the ground.

    To me it wasn't clear - I couldn't see a grounding, but couldn't be sure it wasn't grounded. So TMO has to stick with on field call either way.

    Then again, my tech is pretty low quality and is sometimes prone to a severe welsh bias, so your may be better

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to GibbonRib on last edited by
    #2266

    @gibbonrib yeah, however isn't never seeing it grounded, a reason for no try? France hand under it.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #2267

    @bones said in NH International Rugby:

    @gibbonrib yeah, however isn't never seeing it grounded, a reason for no try? France hand under it.

    Ref called try. TMOhad to see that it clearly wasn’t not probably wasn’t.
    Opposite to the one where the ref choked on a probable try and the TMO couldn’t see clear evidence due to legs in the way.
    Evened out in the end.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #2268

    @crucial again, I thought it was clear. Clearly never saw it on the ground. France held it up.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Do not disturb
    S Do not disturb
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #2269
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #2270

    @bones said in NH International Rugby:

    @crucial again, I thought it was clear. Clearly never saw it on the ground. France held it up.

    You seem to misunderstand. Clearly not seeing something is not clearly seeing something.
    The TMO has to clearly see that the ball never grazed the grass because the ref called a try.
    If the ref calls no try the TMO has to clearly see the ball graze the grass.
    You would have had two different decisions depending on what the ref initially called

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #2271

    @crucial I'll rephrase, clearly held up.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #2272

    @machpants said in NH International Rugby:

    Def yellow though, shoulder to chin, but degree of danger low. O'Aki should have gone lower. Same as rucks, just cos you can't roll away doesn't make it not a penalty, don't put yourself there

    alt text

    I agree it was a card under the current framework, but difficult to see what a tackler is supposed to do when an attacking player leads head first basically at horizontal like Billy did - how do you not make contact with the head there (saying nothing about force, though)?

    M CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #2273

    @junior as always, you're a pro player, don't be there. Taking it to ridiculous extremes, if the only way you can stop a try being scored is to kick the person in the head, do you do it? If you can't take within the laws, don't tackle. I liked it cos it takes interpretation out. Can't roll away? Tough shit, make your tackle completion so you end on the correct side. Can't get low enough to tackle without head contact? Pull out of the tackle

    Crazy HorseC nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    4
  • Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy HorseC Offline
    Crazy Horse
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #2274

    @machpants you make it sound so easy.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to junior on last edited by
    #2275

    @junior it does need to be clear cut rather than an interpretation if players are to have a n excuse to the coach for pulling away from a tackle. We often see players driving low and head first at the line to score and tacklers making direct head contact yet that gets ignored unless there is injury or the try isn’t scored.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

NH International Rugby
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.