SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs

[KiwiMurph]

First 16 mins have been awful.

[Machpants]

Jeez that was a gap

[Bones]

Classic, try by mistake, Christie taking the wrong option again so Eklund fixes it for him.

[Yeetyaah]

U S E T H E B A L L

[Yeetyaah]

On the line

[Machpants]

And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average

[gt12]

Sullivan might not be that slow.

[Stargazer]

Ball was on the line. Grounding is good.

[KiwiMurph]

@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average

Zero pillar defence.

[Bones]

Tackled player gets up again. So much for stamping it out last season.

[Donsteppa]

Very poor defence from the Chiefs. Shame we don’t have Eklund in our squad instead of Nathan Harris. (This finally posted after several of the “Forbidden” errors)

[Machpants]

@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average

Zero pillar defence.

Like the ABs for a fair few years

[Yeetyaah]

No way he's held, fucking bullshit

[KiwiMurph]

Fraser is so bad.

[gt12]

I think that’s fair enough, two dynamic movements there

[Yeetyaah]

@gt12 yeah there was 2 movements, but he wasn't held so it's irrelevant

[Toddy]

He's clearly held. His knee is on the ground while the Blues players have hold of him.

[gt12]

@yeetyaah said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

@gt12 yeah there was 2 movements, but he wasn't held so it's irrelevant

If you call the first one dynamic movement, he cant place it the second time (is my read at least)

[Bones]

@yeetyaah said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:

No way he's held, fucking bullshit

You don't think he was tackled? It's pretty fucken simple - can't hold the player on the ground, tackler must release. If that's the rules then tackles like that must be called correctly.

Or would you rather players having to hold the player on the ground?

[Chris]

FFS Fraser you prodantic prick