Super Rugby Team Of The Week - Round 9
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="575004" data-time="1461655619">
<div>
<p>Brilliant, liking one's own posts.<br><br>
Which kiwi teams won this week?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Crikey Bones, up early again, got some preworkout kicking in ?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I was in the country all weekend, no sky so can't confirm but judging from the posts on here the Canes produced the best 80 minutes ever seen on a Rugby field ever.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="575005" data-time="1461655803"><p>Crikey Bones, up early again, got some preworkout kicking in ?<br><br>
I was in the country all weekend, no sky so can't confirm but judging from the posts on here the Canes produced the best 80 minutes ever seen on a Rugby field ever.</p></blockquote>
I have no idea where you think I am. -
The Crusaders and Chiefs Bones. Whats your point??
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="575007" data-time="1461655924">
<div>
<p>I have no idea where you think I am.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Usually when you're posting at this hour you're off to smash some tin like those mighty, unbeatable, titanic, mercurial Hurricanes.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="575009" data-time="1461656072"><p>Usually when you're posting at this hour you're off to smash some tin like those mighty, unbeatable, titanic, mercurial Hurricanes.</p></blockquote>
It's fucken 8.30 bey! -
You fellas crack me up. Quick to judge my XV but too pussy to post your own. <br><br>
The Canes lost yes but like Cane said post match they were lucky to scrape through.<br><br>
I would back my Canes any day than back a team that reverts to negative tactics just to get them out of a hole. Like Coles said it was a bloody coincidence when their prop went off injured. -
<p>Hey now, no one calls MN5 a pussy on the fern and gets away with it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Given I didn't watch a single game it might not be terribly accurate but how about I go for your exact 15 apart from Ellis and Cruden in for Perenara and Barrett ? is that ok ?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="575006" data-time="1461655874"><p>
To expand...you're expecting people to believe the Canes lost to the Chiefs with the form 9/10, while the Chiefs beat them with no one of note and the Crusaders trounced the Brumbies with a shit halfback. Ummm...</p></blockquote>
<br>
So your saying Cruden and McKenzie are no one of note. Hahahaha ummmmmmmmmm. <br><br>
Kicking aside Barrett outclassed Cruden and Perenara played better than Webber. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Canes4life" data-cid="575018" data-time="1461657022"><p>So your saying Cruden and McKenzie are no one of note. Hahahaha ummmmmmmmmm. <br><br>
Kicking aside Barrett outclassed Cruden and Perenara played better than Webber.</p></blockquote>
Nope, that's you saying that. Why put kicking aside? It's pretty fucking important eh. Ellis played better than Perenara. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="575016" data-time="1461656951"><p>
Hey now, no one calls MN5 a pussy on the fern and gets away with it.<br><br>
Given I didn't watch a single game it might not be terribly accurate but how about I go for your exact 15 apart from Ellis and Cruden in for Perenara and Barrett ? is that ok ?</p></blockquote>
<br>
Why should I bother debating when guys I'm debating with dont even watch the games. <br><br>
This is hilarious. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="575019" data-time="1461657037">
<div>
<p>Mn5 you forgot fern favourite Mounga (SP?)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Sorry Bones, I was busy trying to find an amusing meme to correct Canes4life's confusion over your/you're he must have slipped my mind.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="575020" data-time="1461657191"><p>
Nope, that's you saying that. Why put kicking aside? It's pretty fucking important eh. Ellis played better than Perenara.</p></blockquote>
<br>
You said it before. OMG.<br>
Yeah but Cruden didn't kick so your argument is invalid. <br><br>
If you think Ellis was better that's cool. I thought Perenara was more dangerous this week. Kapeeessh -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Canes4life" data-cid="575023" data-time="1461657348">
<div>
<p>You said it before. OMG.<br>
Yeah but Cruden didn't kick so your argument is invalid.<br><br>
If you think Ellis was better that's cool. I thought Perenara was more dangerous this week. Kapeeessh</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>You posted the team of the week and are vigorously defending the 9/10 axis. The same axis that lost to a team with halfbacks and a first five that weren't as good happarently.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dangerous is good if it's only to the opposition and doesn't include your own team. Making glaring mistakes at crucial times is pretty dangerous, I agree.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm willing to bet Cruden kicked.</p> -
Like the number ten that set up a beaut try to Jane and a near try to old butter fingers to win the match, while also dottting down himself and breaking the line with ease at times.<br><br>
Oh blimey my judgement must be shot. <br><br>
I cant even remember what Cruden contributed to the game apart from running into Barretts elbow. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Canes4life" data-cid="575026" data-time="1461658604">
<div>
<p><br>
I cant even remember what Cruden contributed to the game apart from running into Barretts elbow.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Considering he was the pivot for the winning team I'd say he must have contributed something. At least his goal kicking was at 100% unlike Barrett's</p>
