Super Rugby 2022
-
Only way expanding to include Jap/US sides works is if NZ agree to weaken their sides.
Watching the Crusaders roll out a test match side against Aus/US/Jap/Pacific flogs week in week out will be boring as fuck after year 2.
The main issue with SRTT or whatever format working is that there is no one within a feasible distance that could come close to being competitive year in year out with the NZ SR sides. If we put forward the Wallabies i wouldn't be at all surprised if they didn't top that comp.
You guys want to keep the AB machine running but you have no fodder left to feed it.
-
Only way expanding to include Jap/US sides works is if NZ agree to weaken their sides.
Watching the Crusaders roll out a test match side against Aus/US/Jap/Pacific flogs week in week out will be boring as fuck after year 2.
The main issue with SRTT or whatever format working is that there is no one within a feasible distance that could come close to being competitive year in year out with the NZ SR sides. If we put forward the Wallabies i wouldn't be at all surprised if they didn't top that comp.
You guys want to keep the AB machine running but you have no fodder left to feed it.
-
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
-
@kirwan agreed
-
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
A bit like the old South Pacific championship and Super 10. What does it do to the rest of the NPC?
-
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
-
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
@gt12 said in Super Rugby 2022:
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
So basically the same as the old pre-Super era NPC then...
-
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
@gt12 said in Super Rugby 2022:
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
The exiting npc teams are all at least part time funded plus the funding from the super teams would have to go a long way to paying for them, single “brands” might also be even more attractive to sponsors rather than having to choose between the super team or the box team to sponsor
-
@gt12 said in Super Rugby 2022:
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
The exiting npc teams are all at least part time funded plus the funding from the super teams would have to go a long way to paying for them, single “brands” might also be even more attractive to sponsors rather than having to choose between the super team or the box team to sponsor
@kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2022:
@gt12 said in Super Rugby 2022:
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@derpus Would you be in favour of a longer competition with up 10 NZ based teams?
Chucking the NPC sides in there would certainly even up the competition, I'd be for it.
I'm not sure that it would help, as we'd probably end up with 4 strong sides and 6 weak ones, mostly due to central contracting.
As long as players can choose their provinces/Super sides with no real salary cap in place, we'd end up with some have very muches and some have fuck alls.
Plus, NZ rugby would need to run 10 fully professional teams.
The exiting npc teams are all at least part time funded plus the funding from the super teams would have to go a long way to paying for them, single “brands” might also be even more attractive to sponsors rather than having to choose between the super team or the box team to sponsor
None of that matters unless there is a real salary cap for teams.
-
I like the new SR comp with one exception, remove the 3 random games.
I'd also like to see an old style top 5 instead of practically everyone making the finals. Alternative is those three games get replaced by a Japanese team, an Argie team and one form the US. If the US teams isn't strong enough, maybe have two from Japan?
8 finalists out of 15 would be better, otherwise 5 of 12 is good.
Like the name.
@kirwan said in Super Rugby 2022:
I like the new SR comp with one exception, remove the 3 random games.
I'd also like to see an old style top 5 instead of practically everyone making the finals. Alternative is those three games get replaced by a Japanese team, an Argie team and one form the US. If the US teams isn't strong enough, maybe have two from Japan?
8 finalists out of 15 would be better, otherwise 5 of 12 is good.
Like the name.
No. Too much travel. I’m glad they’re keeping it local. Get the quality up and the travelling down.
-
However, Fiji Rugby chairman Conway Beg has announced the team will be based entirely in Australia for “at least” the inaugural 2022 season. He said the intention was for the team to return to Fiji for 2023.
-
It's all a bit academic isn't it?
Australia have lost the fight to keep Covid out. Even the dimmest politicians are starting to acknowledge that.
The NZ Labour Government isn't the sort to take chances, no matter how much they talk up "risk management" they'll run scared. We'll be screwed down tighter in terms of entry in 2021 than 2022, as they won't want another round of lockdowns making them look bad right before an election.
So no trans- Ta$man competitions in 2022.
And if Labour win, then I wouldn't like to predict the next time we will see one.
-
Any rumours of signings for next season?
From a Blues perspective, lock and midfield signings are of most interest.
-
Any rumours of signings for next season?
From a Blues perspective, lock and midfield signings are of most interest.
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
From a Blues perspective, lock and midfield signings are of most interest.
Seeing him last night, reckon Chocobares would have gone well for us. Will he be available in this new post-covid world?
Beaudy will be huge at 10 - can't wait. He's looking good, and witha decent pack in front of him should do plenty on the field.
Lock si the big area of concern for me, PT will be a big loss at Super level.
-
@tim I heard that Karpik was heading that way, don't know how credible my source is on that though.
-
@tim said in Super Rugby 2022:
@yeetyaah Guess we need replacements for Gibson and Hunt.
Choat would be one ?.
