Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
1.4k Posts 83 Posters 111.6k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Frye

    @nzzp said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

    @delicatessen said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

    If dangerous contact with the head is a red card offence (no matter the intent, nor the outcome), then shouldn't whoever knocked Savea and Codie's heads be carded too? Just cos they weren't out in the open, doesn't mean they aren't dangerous.

    ... and Hooper's facial cut from Retallick.

    The key for me is foreseeability of action. Lifting your sprigs, even in reflex, can directly lead to sprigs in faces. The link to Paolo Odogwu is clear - no intent, but a reckless action. That's what will probably sink JB here.

    The other contacts arguably aren't part of reckless actions- tackles gone wrong (Taylor, Savea), or just dynamic running (Retallick). So I can see a differentiator.

    Agreed. Running with the ball isn't reckless, lifting your boot studs up while catching a ball — is.

    There's a thread on reddit with 4(!) other examples. So it's not that uncommon. And they're all red cards too. Tevita Nabura playing for the Highlanders copped a red and a 6 week ban.

    What might save Jordie is he didn't flick his leg as much as others, he just hung it out.

    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #1239

    @frye said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

    @nzzp said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

    @delicatessen said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

    If dangerous contact with the head is a red card offence (no matter the intent, nor the outcome), then shouldn't whoever knocked Savea and Codie's heads be carded too? Just cos they weren't out in the open, doesn't mean they aren't dangerous.

    ... and Hooper's facial cut from Retallick.

    The key for me is foreseeability of action. Lifting your sprigs, even in reflex, can directly lead to sprigs in faces. The link to Paolo Odogwu is clear - no intent, but a reckless action. That's what will probably sink JB here.

    The other contacts arguably aren't part of reckless actions- tackles gone wrong (Taylor, Savea), or just dynamic running (Retallick). So I can see a differentiator.

    Agreed. Running with the ball isn't reckless, lifting your boot studs up while catching a ball — is.

    There's a thread on reddit with 4(!) other examples. So it's not that uncommon. And they're all red cards too. Tevita Nabura playing for the Highlanders copped a red and a 6 week ban.

    What might save Jordie is he didn't flick his leg as much as others, he just hung it out.

    Not sure how this will go,lifting your boot studs while catching a ball is reckless is, so is jumping leading with a knee if someone cops knee in face, but almost everyone does it as it almost impossible to jump up with legs straight.

    nzzpN D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • Dan54D Dan54

      @frye said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

      @nzzp said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

      @delicatessen said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

      If dangerous contact with the head is a red card offence (no matter the intent, nor the outcome), then shouldn't whoever knocked Savea and Codie's heads be carded too? Just cos they weren't out in the open, doesn't mean they aren't dangerous.

      ... and Hooper's facial cut from Retallick.

      The key for me is foreseeability of action. Lifting your sprigs, even in reflex, can directly lead to sprigs in faces. The link to Paolo Odogwu is clear - no intent, but a reckless action. That's what will probably sink JB here.

      The other contacts arguably aren't part of reckless actions- tackles gone wrong (Taylor, Savea), or just dynamic running (Retallick). So I can see a differentiator.

      Agreed. Running with the ball isn't reckless, lifting your boot studs up while catching a ball — is.

      There's a thread on reddit with 4(!) other examples. So it's not that uncommon. And they're all red cards too. Tevita Nabura playing for the Highlanders copped a red and a 6 week ban.

      What might save Jordie is he didn't flick his leg as much as others, he just hung it out.

      Not sure how this will go,lifting your boot studs while catching a ball is reckless is, so is jumping leading with a knee if someone cops knee in face, but almost everyone does it as it almost impossible to jump up with legs straight.

      nzzpN Offline
      nzzpN Offline
      nzzp
      wrote on last edited by
      #1240

      @dan54 said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

      Not sure how this will go,lifting your boot studs while catching a ball is reckless is, so is jumping leading with a knee if someone cops knee in face, but almost everyone does it as it almost impossible to jump up with legs straight.

      Yep, but it's a degree and a proximity thing. Knees are close to the body, and if you hit it, it's like a tackle. In fairness to Kerevi, he was a long way back, and waiting to tackle. Raised sprigs make that bloody hard, and dangerous.

      I don't like the outcome, as it's reflexvely reckless, but I can see the logic and the likely suspension incoming.

      One thing I haven't seen (and haven't seen video again) is - did JB get bumped on his way up? If so, it may be a minor mitigation of some form (the Benjamin Fall defence, right)

      CrucialC BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
      2
      • taniwharugbyT Offline
        taniwharugbyT Offline
        taniwharugby
        wrote on last edited by
        #1241

        @nzzp plus you are taught when jumping for a high ball to bring your knee up like that, just the extension of the leg is the problem.

        Anyhow...

        KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
        7
        • Dan54D Dan54

          @frye said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

          @nzzp said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

          @delicatessen said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

          If dangerous contact with the head is a red card offence (no matter the intent, nor the outcome), then shouldn't whoever knocked Savea and Codie's heads be carded too? Just cos they weren't out in the open, doesn't mean they aren't dangerous.

          ... and Hooper's facial cut from Retallick.

          The key for me is foreseeability of action. Lifting your sprigs, even in reflex, can directly lead to sprigs in faces. The link to Paolo Odogwu is clear - no intent, but a reckless action. That's what will probably sink JB here.

          The other contacts arguably aren't part of reckless actions- tackles gone wrong (Taylor, Savea), or just dynamic running (Retallick). So I can see a differentiator.

          Agreed. Running with the ball isn't reckless, lifting your boot studs up while catching a ball — is.

          There's a thread on reddit with 4(!) other examples. So it's not that uncommon. And they're all red cards too. Tevita Nabura playing for the Highlanders copped a red and a 6 week ban.

          What might save Jordie is he didn't flick his leg as much as others, he just hung it out.

          Not sure how this will go,lifting your boot studs while catching a ball is reckless is, so is jumping leading with a knee if someone cops knee in face, but almost everyone does it as it almost impossible to jump up with legs straight.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          DaGrubster
          wrote on last edited by
          #1242

          @dan54

          Knees lift in the jump to gain height and used as protection. It’s pretty standard technique for players. You can see he arched backward just before he caught the ball which lead to his leg raising up.

          Its the direct contact to the face that will see him get some time off. They won’t ignore that.

          Which is a problem for us as I don’t think we won’t to be facing the kick boks with Dmac as fullback. JBs height would
          Be invaluable along with his kicking from hand.

          Especially when you consider the games are in sub tropical Townsville. The Boks won’t want a fast paced game and will kick the crap out of it.

          chimoausC Dan54D 2 Replies Last reply
          7
          • D DaGrubster

            @dan54

            Knees lift in the jump to gain height and used as protection. It’s pretty standard technique for players. You can see he arched backward just before he caught the ball which lead to his leg raising up.

            Its the direct contact to the face that will see him get some time off. They won’t ignore that.

            Which is a problem for us as I don’t think we won’t to be facing the kick boks with Dmac as fullback. JBs height would
            Be invaluable along with his kicking from hand.

            Especially when you consider the games are in sub tropical Townsville. The Boks won’t want a fast paced game and will kick the crap out of it.

            chimoausC Offline
            chimoausC Offline
            chimoaus
            wrote on last edited by
            #1243

            @dagrubster Jordan must be an option at the back?

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

              @yeahtheboys

              https://teara.govt.nz/en/cartoon/38760/all-blacks-and-make-up-2004

              CrucialC Offline
              CrucialC Offline
              Crucial
              wrote on last edited by
              #1244

              @nostrildamus said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

              @yeahtheboys

              https://teara.govt.nz/en/cartoon/38760/all-blacks-and-make-up-2004

              I never saw or heard the nickname used outside of the Fern. That could be my problem but is it possible that we made 'te ara'?

              boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nzzpN nzzp

                @dan54 said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                Not sure how this will go,lifting your boot studs while catching a ball is reckless is, so is jumping leading with a knee if someone cops knee in face, but almost everyone does it as it almost impossible to jump up with legs straight.

                Yep, but it's a degree and a proximity thing. Knees are close to the body, and if you hit it, it's like a tackle. In fairness to Kerevi, he was a long way back, and waiting to tackle. Raised sprigs make that bloody hard, and dangerous.

                I don't like the outcome, as it's reflexvely reckless, but I can see the logic and the likely suspension incoming.

                One thing I haven't seen (and haven't seen video again) is - did JB get bumped on his way up? If so, it may be a minor mitigation of some form (the Benjamin Fall defence, right)

                CrucialC Offline
                CrucialC Offline
                Crucial
                wrote on last edited by
                #1245

                @nzzp said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @dan54 said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                Not sure how this will go,lifting your boot studs while catching a ball is reckless is, so is jumping leading with a knee if someone cops knee in face, but almost everyone does it as it almost impossible to jump up with legs straight.

                Yep, but it's a degree and a proximity thing. Knees are close to the body, and if you hit it, it's like a tackle. In fairness to Kerevi, he was a long way back, and waiting to tackle. Raised sprigs make that bloody hard, and dangerous.

                I don't like the outcome, as it's reflexvely reckless, but I can see the logic and the likely suspension incoming.

                One thing I haven't seen (and haven't seen video again) is - did JB get bumped on his way up? If so, it may be a minor mitigation of some form (the Benjamin Fall defence, right)

                No bump, was in the clear and owned the space. Kerevi wasn't waiting he was moving into the space. I believe that is the argument the ABs are using in defence. As a player in the air JB had rights to the space he needed to come down safely.
                It was just a plain old accident of a dynamic situation.
                I do hope @ACT-Crusader has sent them that video of BBall players jumping though. Clear evidence that the leg extension is common amongst tall athletes when leaping high.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • CrucialC Crucial

                  @nostrildamus said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @yeahtheboys

                  https://teara.govt.nz/en/cartoon/38760/all-blacks-and-make-up-2004

                  I never saw or heard the nickname used outside of the Fern. That could be my problem but is it possible that we made 'te ara'?

                  boobooB Online
                  boobooB Online
                  booboo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1246

                  @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @nostrildamus said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @yeahtheboys

                  https://teara.govt.nz/en/cartoon/38760/all-blacks-and-make-up-2004

                  I never saw or heard the nickname used outside of the Fern. That could be my problem but is it possible that we made 'te ara'?

                  No. Was pretty common back in the day.

                  I didn't find the Fern till 2004 after we shifted to Oz and knew he was Meg prior to that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • boobooB Online
                    boobooB Online
                    booboo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1247

                    My limited understanding based on snippets read is that "deliberate contact to the head with force" constitutes a RC.

                    So, break that down:

                    • deliberate? No
                    • head? Yes
                    • force? Minimal

                    Other mitigating factors?

                    • seeking balance for safety
                    • orange player impeding ability to safely execute

                    Struggling to get RC out of that.

                    Seeing a clip subsequent to the game it's clear Murphy immediately called for the TMO to "check that". So the TMO review IMO wasn't an impartial review of the facts, it was a process to try and confirm Murphy's immediate reaction.

                    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • CrucialC Offline
                      CrucialC Offline
                      Crucial
                      wrote on last edited by Crucial
                      #1248

                      I found that thread and am watching the similar examples.

                      Nabura's one was intentional and the ref says so before even watching a second time. He catches the ball, looks at the incoming player and sticks his leg out deliberately while coming down.

                      Dan Evans on Teddy Thomas. Similar to JBs in that the leg went out for balance and Thomas ran into it. At the time the commentators said 'just unfortunate accident' and were very surprised at the RC. Not sure if the ruling was published but will have a search.

                      Adam Hastings. Completely overbalanced after a fairly low jump.

                      I really don't understand what the law makers want. They don't want to remove jumping for the ball as that is an exciting athletic part of the game yet it seems that accidents in the jumping zone get harshly punished. A 'tackler' can't touch the jumper in the air in case they land badly yet a jumper can't try and land safely themselves without it being a reckless act?

                      Surely the easiest thing to do here is to keep with the judgement of it being a 'competition for the ball' but if you aren't in that competition you cannot move into the jumpers landing space. There will still be times when you are jumped into and haven't got out of the way but it is well understood now to watch your position when a high kick comes and either contest the ball or get away.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • BovidaeB Offline
                        BovidaeB Offline
                        Bovidae
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1249

                        You'd have to go back and find when Marshall first went for the blonde highlights to know the timeframe for the nickname. It was certainly used on r.s.r.u (usenet newsgroups), which predate TSF and other web-based sites.

                        CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • CrucialC Offline
                          CrucialC Offline
                          Crucial
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1250

                          Found some quotes on the Dan Evans one. IMO this is the precedent that will cause us problems in defending this.

                          Firstly Ospreys didn't challenge the ruling. They decided the risk of an 8 week ban was too costly and cut their losses with a guilty plea (this is why I hate that system. Bad decisions get justification because challenging is punished)

                          A statement from the independent disciplinary panel continued: "There were no aggravating factors, and taking into account the player's guilty plea and timely expression of remorse, the committee reduced the sanction by the maximum of 50 per cent before imposing a four-week suspension."

                          They upheld the RC by saying his action was reckless. I would strongly question how a human instinct to stop yourself falling over can be reckless.

                          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • BovidaeB Bovidae

                            You'd have to go back and find when Marshall first went for the blonde highlights to know the timeframe for the nickname. It was certainly used on r.s.r.u (usenet newsgroups), which predate TSF and other web-based sites.

                            CrucialC Offline
                            CrucialC Offline
                            Crucial
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1251

                            @bovidae said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            You'd have to go back and find when Marshall first went for the blonde highlights to know the timeframe for the nickname. It was certainly used on r.s.r.u (usenet newsgroups), which predate TSF and other web-based sites.

                            Boy. Just had a look at that usenet group and it is now a repository of the biggest pile of shite imaginable. Just by looking at the page I am now probably on a watchlist!
                            Surely google should be shutting down these unmonitored feral sounding boards. They are a gateway to all the things wrong with the world.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • CrucialC Crucial

                              Found some quotes on the Dan Evans one. IMO this is the precedent that will cause us problems in defending this.

                              Firstly Ospreys didn't challenge the ruling. They decided the risk of an 8 week ban was too costly and cut their losses with a guilty plea (this is why I hate that system. Bad decisions get justification because challenging is punished)

                              A statement from the independent disciplinary panel continued: "There were no aggravating factors, and taking into account the player's guilty plea and timely expression of remorse, the committee reduced the sanction by the maximum of 50 per cent before imposing a four-week suspension."

                              They upheld the RC by saying his action was reckless. I would strongly question how a human instinct to stop yourself falling over can be reckless.

                              taniwharugbyT Offline
                              taniwharugbyT Offline
                              taniwharugby
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1252

                              @crucial its the ABs, he will get it reversed, RC rescinded and a try awarded to his record.

                              I cant see anything lower than 3 weeks.

                              CrucialC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                @crucial its the ABs, he will get it reversed, RC rescinded and a try awarded to his record.

                                I cant see anything lower than 3 weeks.

                                CrucialC Offline
                                CrucialC Offline
                                Crucial
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1253

                                @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                @crucial its the ABs, he will get it reversed, RC rescinded and a try awarded to his record.

                                I cant see anything lower than 3 weeks.

                                Would be minimum 4 weeks even with a guilty plea which is why the ABs are disputing.
                                Any head contact RC goes in a minimum 8 weeks. Mitigation can reduce that by half but pleading not guilty and therefore not owning it takes away one of the common mitigations.

                                The definition of reckless implies a voluntary action. If I was arguing this to the judiciary that would be the main point. If he had no control over lifting that leg other than an instinctive action to not fall and risk injury then his action can't be reckless by definition.

                                taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • CrucialC Crucial

                                  @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                  @crucial its the ABs, he will get it reversed, RC rescinded and a try awarded to his record.

                                  I cant see anything lower than 3 weeks.

                                  Would be minimum 4 weeks even with a guilty plea which is why the ABs are disputing.
                                  Any head contact RC goes in a minimum 8 weeks. Mitigation can reduce that by half but pleading not guilty and therefore not owning it takes away one of the common mitigations.

                                  The definition of reckless implies a voluntary action. If I was arguing this to the judiciary that would be the main point. If he had no control over lifting that leg other than an instinctive action to not fall and risk injury then his action can't be reckless by definition.

                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugby
                                  wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                                  #1254

                                  @crucial have seen dangerous tackles with head contact and a RC get 3 weeks? Are they treated differently?

                                  CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                    @crucial have seen dangerous tackles with head contact and a RC get 3 weeks? Are they treated differently?

                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    Crucial
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1255

                                    @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                    @crucial have seen dangerous tackles with head contact and a RC get 3 weeks? Are they treated differently?

                                    I think it is the original charge situation. Maybe dangerous tackle mid point is 6 weeks and kick in head is 8?

                                    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CrucialC Crucial

                                      @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                      @crucial have seen dangerous tackles with head contact and a RC get 3 weeks? Are they treated differently?

                                      I think it is the original charge situation. Maybe dangerous tackle mid point is 6 weeks and kick in head is 8?

                                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                                      taniwharugby
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1256

                                      @crucial that is the problem, it wasnt a kick, it was reckless use of ones foot

                                      No way that they should start the process at the same place as someone that deliberately kicked someones head.

                                      CrucialC boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                                      2
                                      • D DaGrubster

                                        @dan54

                                        Knees lift in the jump to gain height and used as protection. It’s pretty standard technique for players. You can see he arched backward just before he caught the ball which lead to his leg raising up.

                                        Its the direct contact to the face that will see him get some time off. They won’t ignore that.

                                        Which is a problem for us as I don’t think we won’t to be facing the kick boks with Dmac as fullback. JBs height would
                                        Be invaluable along with his kicking from hand.

                                        Especially when you consider the games are in sub tropical Townsville. The Boks won’t want a fast paced game and will kick the crap out of it.

                                        Dan54D Offline
                                        Dan54D Offline
                                        Dan54
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1257

                                        @dagrubster said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                        @dan54

                                        Knees lift in the jump to gain height and used as protection. It’s pretty standard technique for players. You can see he arched backward just before he caught the ball which lead to his leg raising up.

                                        Its the direct contact to the face that will see him get some time off. They won’t ignore that.

                                        Which is a problem for us as I don’t think we won’t to be facing the kick boks with Dmac as fullback. JBs height would
                                        Be invaluable along with his kicking from hand.

                                        Especially when you consider the games are in sub tropical Townsville. The Boks won’t want a fast paced game and will kick the crap out of it.

                                        Mate, I think red card was fair enough, but will not be surprised if it seen as enough. There will be lawyers, and experts on dynamics of jumping etc to show why this or that happened, and I suspect the fact that Marika was moving into his space will have a lot to do with outcome, even Dave Rennie was adamant it was completely accidental in press conference etc and think just maybe the board will say that is enough punishment.

                                        canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • Dan54D Dan54

                                          @dagrubster said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @dan54

                                          Knees lift in the jump to gain height and used as protection. It’s pretty standard technique for players. You can see he arched backward just before he caught the ball which lead to his leg raising up.

                                          Its the direct contact to the face that will see him get some time off. They won’t ignore that.

                                          Which is a problem for us as I don’t think we won’t to be facing the kick boks with Dmac as fullback. JBs height would
                                          Be invaluable along with his kicking from hand.

                                          Especially when you consider the games are in sub tropical Townsville. The Boks won’t want a fast paced game and will kick the crap out of it.

                                          Mate, I think red card was fair enough, but will not be surprised if it seen as enough. There will be lawyers, and experts on dynamics of jumping etc to show why this or that happened, and I suspect the fact that Marika was moving into his space will have a lot to do with outcome, even Dave Rennie was adamant it was completely accidental in press conference etc and think just maybe the board will say that is enough punishment.

                                          canefanC Offline
                                          canefanC Offline
                                          canefan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1258

                                          @dan54 said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @dagrubster said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @dan54

                                          Knees lift in the jump to gain height and used as protection. It’s pretty standard technique for players. You can see he arched backward just before he caught the ball which lead to his leg raising up.

                                          Its the direct contact to the face that will see him get some time off. They won’t ignore that.

                                          Which is a problem for us as I don’t think we won’t to be facing the kick boks with Dmac as fullback. JBs height would
                                          Be invaluable along with his kicking from hand.

                                          Especially when you consider the games are in sub tropical Townsville. The Boks won’t want a fast paced game and will kick the crap out of it.

                                          Mate, I think red card was fair enough, but will not be surprised if it seen as enough. There will be lawyers, and experts on dynamics of jumping etc to show why this or that happened, and I suspect the fact that Marika was moving into his space will have a lot to do with outcome, even Dave Rennie was adamant it was completely accidental in press conference etc and think just maybe the board will say that is enough punishment.

                                          That would be reasonable IMHO

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search