All Blacks vs Pumas I
-
Should be a YC if it's not a try as it was penalty advantage again
-
@machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@stargazer said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
Blackadder's first test try?
Nah looks like double movement to me
At least Argentina will get a yellow card now, right?
@anonymous said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@stargazer said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
Blackadder's first test try?
Nah looks like double movement to me
At least Argentina will get a yellow card now, right?
Yup
-
@stockcar86 said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
Should be Akira off back of scrum 5 out
Bit difficult when he's not on the field.
@nepia said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@stockcar86 said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
Should be Akira off back of scrum 5 out
Bit difficult when he's not on the field.
I believe in him
-
@taniwharugby Well tbf, it's better to find out now whether guys like McKenzie can play 10 or not at this level, and a lot of these bench players that have come on won't be in our strongest 23, yet here we have them playing 35 mins here when they probably wouldn't be against the Boks or English so yeah, we lose structure a bit in this game, but benefit going forward.
@african-monkey said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@taniwharugby Well tbf, it's better to find out now whether guys like McKenzie can play 10 or not at this level, and a lot of these bench players that have come on won't be in our strongest 23, yet here we have them playing 35 mins here when they probably wouldn't be against the Boks or English so yeah, we lose structure a bit in this game, but benefit going forward.
We already know the answer to your question and it's a resounding no.
-
@kiwimurph lol. You obviously missed the Jacobsen try.
-
@african-monkey said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@taniwharugby Well tbf, it's better to find out now whether guys like McKenzie can play 10 or not at this level, and a lot of these bench players that have come on won't be in our strongest 23, yet here we have them playing 35 mins here when they probably wouldn't be against the Boks or English so yeah, we lose structure a bit in this game, but benefit going forward.
We already know the answer to your question and it's a resounding no.
@antipodean Yeah, he isn't great there.....
-
@taniwharugby Well tbf, it's better to find out now whether guys like McKenzie can play 10 or not at this level, and a lot of these bench players that have come on won't be in our strongest 23, yet here we have them playing 35 mins here when they probably wouldn't be against the Boks or English so yeah, we lose structure a bit in this game, but benefit going forward.
@african-monkey I think we already knew the answer to that.
They should be out there with a game plan, instead we are all over the show struggling to impose ourselves on the game, again.
-
@african-monkey said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@taniwharugby Well tbf, it's better to find out now whether guys like McKenzie can play 10 or not at this level, and a lot of these bench players that have come on won't be in our strongest 23, yet here we have them playing 35 mins here when they probably wouldn't be against the Boks or English so yeah, we lose structure a bit in this game, but benefit going forward.
We already know the answer to your question and it's a resounding no.
@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@african-monkey said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
@taniwharugby Well tbf, it's better to find out now whether guys like McKenzie can play 10 or not at this level, and a lot of these bench players that have come on won't be in our strongest 23, yet here we have them playing 35 mins here when they probably wouldn't be against the Boks or English so yeah, we lose structure a bit in this game, but benefit going forward.
We already know the answer to your question and it's a resounding no.
McKenzie is all over the place. No one knows where he is going. Ok here but not what you want from 1st in tight games.
-
on that replay if tupea hadn't been a hungus and cut in, also not helped by Mac going to far, Reiko practically unmarked
@bayimports said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
on that replay if tupea hadn't been a hungus and cut in, also not helped by Mac going to far, Reiko practically unmarked
Yep.
Tups has received a couple of hot potatoes from DMac. Not giving him time to pass wider
-
Lol why are we trying to bash over with our 12s. They aren’t big enough. Spread it wide.
-
Lol why are we trying to bash over with our 12s. They aren’t big enough. Spread it wide.
@canes4life said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
Lol why are we trying to bash over with our 12s. They aren’t big enough. Spread it wide.
I dunno Tupaea looks like a bit of a unit
-
@duluth said in All Blacks vs Pumas I (yay we’re not playing the Aussies again):
A couple of subs bombing tries
I'll say, just bloody score already
-
This held up rule is the worst law modification.
-
@duluth too many Chiefs players aye.
