Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks vs Pumas II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.1k Posts 75 Posters 89.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Machpants

    @chris said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

    Calling for the end to his career as a couple of people did last night was over the top,

    That was me, and I wasn't saying he should never play again. I was saying that stupidly giving a pointless penalty straight after a score to let the opposition back in the game is an act that gives coaches the shits. It is the sort of thing that make coaches say Yeah, Nah - a career ending level of stupidity if that is the norm. He was not under pressure, and neither were the ABs. He's lucky Eddie wasn't coach! He has a great engine but made far too many mistakes.

    Commentators and mainstream media seem to rate players on the number of times they mention their name, rather than accuracy and intelligent play. Means those grafters who are core to good test match rugby are often under rated, and those that are here there and everywhere get the points. DMac very much in this mold, normally. Rated high when really he causes his team a load of problems with the flashy shit. Not this game tho.

    So yeah Ethan is a late starter at 26 and need sto get his accuracy up to feature more. Hopefully he will.

    ChrisC Online
    ChrisC Online
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #908

    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

    @chris said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

    Calling for the end to his career as a couple of people did last night was over the top,

    That was me, and I wasn't saying he should never play again. I was saying that stupidly giving a pointless penalty straight after a score to let the opposition back in the game is an act that gives coaches the shits. It is the sort of thing that make coaches say Yeah, Nah. He's lucky Eddie wasn't coach! He has a great engine but made far too many mistakes.

    Commentators and mainstream media seem to rate players on the number of times they mention their name, rather than accuracy and intelligent play. Means those grafters who are core to good test match rugby are often under rated, and those that are here there and everywhere get the points. DMac very much in this mold, normally. Rated high when really he causes his team a load of problems with the flashy shit. Not this game tho.

    So yeah Ethan is a late starter at 26 and need sto get his accuracy up to feature more

    Seems a reasonable post,I don't disagree with all your points.But Blackadder is a wait and see if he fine tunes his game to grow as a 6.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • antipodeanA antipodean

      @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

      Hell of an effort from Vaa'i to go 80, but the only time I've "seen" him is when he's dotting down. Struggling with if that's a good thing or not.

      He's not much of a presence eh.

      Can't say I've noticed him carrying much. Seems to be used as support.

      BovidaeB Offline
      BovidaeB Offline
      Bovidae
      wrote on last edited by
      #909

      @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

      @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

      Hell of an effort from Vaa'i to go 80, but the only time I've "seen" him is when he's dotting down. Struggling with if that's a good thing or not.

      He's not much of a presence eh.

      Can't say I've noticed him carrying much. Seems to be used as support.

      Vaa'i was being used as a distributor with those short passes in the midfield. But he did have more carries and run metres than Tuipulotu.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • D Derpus

        Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

        boobooB Offline
        boobooB Offline
        booboo
        wrote on last edited by
        #910

        @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

        Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

        Not quite

        nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • boobooB booboo

          @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

          Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

          Not quite

          nzzpN Offline
          nzzpN Offline
          nzzp
          wrote on last edited by
          #911

          @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

          @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

          Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

          Not quite

          apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

          You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

          DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • KiwiMurphK Online
            KiwiMurphK Online
            KiwiMurph
            wrote on last edited by
            #912

            There were ESPN paintings on the field this week - indicating an Argie 'home' game.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nzzpN nzzp

              @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

              @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

              Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

              Not quite

              apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

              You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

              DamoD Offline
              DamoD Offline
              Damo
              wrote on last edited by
              #913

              @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

              @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

              @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

              Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

              Not quite

              apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

              You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

              I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

              Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • BovidaeB Offline
                BovidaeB Offline
                Bovidae
                wrote on last edited by
                #914

                The sponsors on the goal post padding and flags, rugby balls and even the kit that the ball boy/girls wear all changes depending on who is the designated home team.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • DamoD Damo

                  @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                  Not quite

                  apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                  You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                  I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                  Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #915

                  @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                  Not quite

                  apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                  You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                  I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                  Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                  I guess we must have, if this was the same for Argentina. Was a boks home game too, then. Fucking stupid if that's the decision for ranking points

                  DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • M Machpants

                    @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                    Not quite

                    apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                    You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                    I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                    Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                    I guess we must have, if this was the same for Argentina. Was a boks home game too, then. Fucking stupid if that's the decision for ranking points

                    DamoD Offline
                    DamoD Offline
                    Damo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #916

                    @machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                    Not quite

                    apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                    You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                    I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                    Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                    I guess we must have, if this was the same for Argentina. Was a boks home game too, then. Fucking stupid if that's the decision for ranking points

                    Haha so the Boks play Australia in Australia and World Rugby consider it a home game for the Boks.

                    I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly. Who cares where the game was originally scheduled to be played 6 months ago

                    M Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                      Daffy JaffyD Offline
                      Daffy Jaffy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #917

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • TimT Away
                        TimT Away
                        Tim
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #918

                        Not unusual for a loose forward to get caught out of position on defense in their first season of test rugby. Happened with Papalii a few times, but now he's a gun.

                        Blackadder had some good impact, but has noticeably missed tackles in his previous outings. Nothing wrong with his technique, rather his positioning. He will likely improve.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • DamoD Damo

                          @machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                          Not quite

                          apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                          You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                          I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                          Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                          I guess we must have, if this was the same for Argentina. Was a boks home game too, then. Fucking stupid if that's the decision for ranking points

                          Haha so the Boks play Australia in Australia and World Rugby consider it a home game for the Boks.

                          I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly. Who cares where the game was originally scheduled to be played 6 months ago

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #919

                          @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                          Not quite

                          apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                          You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                          I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                          Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                          I guess we must have, if this was the same for Argentina. Was a boks home game too, then. Fucking stupid if that's the decision for ranking points

                          Haha so the Boks play Australia in Australia and World Rugby consider it a home game for the Boks.

                          I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly. Who cares where the game was originally scheduled to be played 6 months ago

                          We'll find out on Monday, if we are world 1, then that is what has happened for the rankings If not, WR have at least 2 brain cells to rub together.

                          KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • TimT Away
                            TimT Away
                            Tim
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #920

                            Lomax looked much improved. Taukei'aho was the standout.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • StargazerS Offline
                              StargazerS Offline
                              Stargazer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #921

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DamoD Damo

                                @machpants said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                @derpus said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                Are the ABs number 1 again yet? No one is even close.

                                Not quite

                                apparently we are. Sounds like this was a 'home game' for the Argies. It's not great - but there's a fair bit of reporting that we're back to No1.

                                You'd think this sort of thing would have been clarified by World Rugby or SANZAAAAAAARSE before the game started, eh

                                I think that would be stupid if true. It's a game played on neutral ground, no matter where it was supposed to be played.

                                Do we know if last week was considered a home game for us for ratings purposes.

                                I guess we must have, if this was the same for Argentina. Was a boks home game too, then. Fucking stupid if that's the decision for ranking points

                                Haha so the Boks play Australia in Australia and World Rugby consider it a home game for the Boks.

                                I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly. Who cares where the game was originally scheduled to be played 6 months ago

                                Chris B.C Offline
                                Chris B.C Offline
                                Chris B.
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #922

                                @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly.

                                Rugby administrators making a bollocks of their competitions?

                                I find that extremely hard to believe. 🙂

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                  @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly.

                                  Rugby administrators making a bollocks of their competitions?

                                  I find that extremely hard to believe. 🙂

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Machpants
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #923

                                  @chris-b said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @damo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  I reckon this hasn't been thought through properly.

                                  Rugby administrators making a bollocks of their competitions?

                                  I find that extremely hard to believe. 🙂

                                  alt text

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • nzzpN Offline
                                    nzzpN Offline
                                    nzzp
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #924

                                    Anyone know what the actual rule on picking up the ball from inside a ruck is? Do you just need something behind that last foot? Because ruling one out last week and letting it stand this week is a bad look for world rugby.

                                    @Damo @NTA or any other refs?

                                    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • broughieB broughie

                                      @african-monkey nice post. Agree about Blackadder compared with options out there except maybe the Ginger.

                                      Agree about the hookers. I think Taylor’s form has dropped as well and with the go forward with ST and AA it means we are on the front foot more. Lineouts I don’t remember being a problem yesterday.

                                      Agree with Dmac covering on the bench. JB to start.

                                      TV and Lomax were pretty good and I am with you in him replacing PT.

                                      Understand the safety of Bridge but you lost me there. Did not do anything wrong but not in my starting 23.

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      African Monkey
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #925

                                      @broughie On Bridge, yeah, I wouldn't usually have him in my 23, but against a team that likes to put the ball up, I think he may be a good option. As I said, not really a fan of his, but I can understand why if he does get the nod for the boks with De Klerk, Pollard and Le Roux putting a lot of bombs up.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • nzzpN nzzp

                                        Anyone know what the actual rule on picking up the ball from inside a ruck is? Do you just need something behind that last foot? Because ruling one out last week and letting it stand this week is a bad look for world rugby.

                                        @Damo @NTA or any other refs?

                                        NTAN Offline
                                        NTAN Offline
                                        NTA
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #926

                                        @nzzp said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                        Anyone know what the actual rule on picking up the ball from inside a ruck is? Do you just need something behind that last foot? Because ruling one out last week and letting it stand this week is a bad look for world rugby.

                                        @Damo @NTA or any other refs?

                                        From the most recent Game Management Guidelines:

                                        "At a tackle, a player can pick up the ball as long as one foot is level with or behind the ball. At a ruck, a
                                        player can pick up the ball as long as both feet are level with or behind the ball. If a player is still bound
                                        with an opponent, then they cannot pick up the ball."

                                        So if there is no ruck, one foot. If it's a ruck and you're not bound to an opponent, two feet.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • KiwiMurphK Online
                                          KiwiMurphK Online
                                          KiwiMurph
                                          wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
                                          #927

                                          One thing that has impressed me about this coaching staff is the ability to get players to have their error rate lower than Super Rugby.

                                          Samisoni, QT (before he gassed out), Jordie, Akira (didn't play last night but in earlier games), Lomax etc.

                                          A lot more accurate in black.

                                          NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search