Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies v Pumas II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaargentina
190 Posts 37 Posters 6.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #146

    Petaia really does need to get some help with this cramp issue.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L_n_PL L_n_P

      @canes4life said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

      @l_n_p Aussies growing some great depth. They still have Vunivalu waiting in the wings aswell, along with Koroibete not suiting up for this game.

      I'm happy for them, historically they play rugby worth watching. Bledisloe matches next year could be competitive.

      Dave Rennie has pulled a lot of threads together, all credit.

      Canes4lifeC Online
      Canes4lifeC Online
      Canes4life
      wrote on last edited by
      #147

      @l_n_p when you think about those that aren’t playing tonight and other overseas players likely to come in for the European tour, they really do have a great foundation to build from leading into the 2023 WC.

      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

        @l_n_p when you think about those that aren’t playing tonight and other overseas players likely to come in for the European tour, they really do have a great foundation to build from leading into the 2023 WC.

        antipodeanA Offline
        antipodeanA Offline
        antipodean
        wrote on last edited by
        #148

        @canes4life said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

        @l_n_p when you think about those that aren’t playing tonight and other overseas players likely to come in for the European tour, they really do have a great foundation to build from leading into the 2023 WC.

        That's a speech we've never heard before.

        Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • antipodeanA antipodean

          @canes4life said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

          @l_n_p when you think about those that aren’t playing tonight and other overseas players likely to come in for the European tour, they really do have a great foundation to build from leading into the 2023 WC.

          That's a speech we've never heard before.

          Canes4lifeC Online
          Canes4lifeC Online
          Canes4life
          wrote on last edited by
          #149

          @antipodean #makethewallabiesgreatagain

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • YeetyaahY Offline
            YeetyaahY Offline
            Yeetyaah
            wrote on last edited by
            #150

            Been boring for the last wee bit

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              Anonymous
              wrote on last edited by
              #151

              Why are we stopping with a hooker down? They have two on the field

              antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by
                #152

                Ozzie have run out of reserves, now playing the bok game

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • YeetyaahY Yeetyaah

                  Been boring for the last wee bit

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #153

                  @yeetyaah said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                  Been boring for the last wee bit

                  69 minutes?

                  YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • A Anonymous

                    Why are we stopping with a hooker down? They have two on the field

                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #154

                    @anonymous said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                    Why are we stopping with a hooker down? They have two on the field

                    Pace of the game is too much for the Wallabies...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • M Machpants

                      @yeetyaah said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                      Been boring for the last wee bit

                      69 minutes?

                      YeetyaahY Offline
                      YeetyaahY Offline
                      Yeetyaah
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #155

                      @machpants nice

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • YeetyaahY Yeetyaah

                        @machpants nice

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Machpants
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #156

                        @yeetyaah said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                        @machpants nice

                        Ozzie have had some nice tries, but pretty lame game

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • O Offline
                          O Offline
                          Old Samurai Jack
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #157

                          Hodge is podge.

                          BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • BonesB Offline
                            BonesB Offline
                            Bones
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #158

                            So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                            antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • DuluthD Offline
                              DuluthD Offline
                              Duluth
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #159

                              I want to see the old man Greg Holmes recreate his try from 2006

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • BonesB Bones

                                So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                antipodeanA Offline
                                antipodeanA Offline
                                antipodean
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #160

                                @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • antipodeanA antipodean

                                  @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                  Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                  BonesB Offline
                                  BonesB Offline
                                  Bones
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #161

                                  @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                  Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                  Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                                  antipodeanA NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Machpants
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #162

                                    Stadium has filled up for the main course

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • O Old Samurai Jack

                                      Hodge is podge.

                                      BonesB Offline
                                      BonesB Offline
                                      Bones
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #163

                                      @old-samurai-jack said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                      Hodge is podge.

                                      Hodge is the player we wish Bridge could be.

                                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiMurphK Offline
                                        KiwiMurphK Offline
                                        KiwiMurph
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #164

                                        Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.

                                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • BonesB Bones

                                          @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                          @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                          So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                          Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                          Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                                          antipodeanA Offline
                                          antipodeanA Offline
                                          antipodean
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #165

                                          @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                          @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                          @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                          So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                          Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                          Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                                          Yeah but the try was awarded. The disparity you're pointing at I get, but that's a vagary of the law. You'd hate to see everyone YC just because they were last in defence and gave a potential penalty away while still being scored against.

                                          BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search