Wallabies v Pumas II
-
@anonymous said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
Why are we stopping with a hooker down? They have two on the field
Pace of the game is too much for the Wallabies...
-
@machpants nice
-
@machpants nice
@yeetyaah said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@machpants nice
Ozzie have had some nice tries, but pretty lame game
-
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
-
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...
-
Hodge is podge.
@old-samurai-jack said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
Hodge is podge.
Hodge is the player we wish Bridge could be.
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...
Yeah but the try was awarded. The disparity you're pointing at I get, but that's a vagary of the law. You'd hate to see everyone YC just because they were last in defence and gave a potential penalty away while still being scored against.
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...
Was a discussion point among refs here for these situations where it is close to the line - how do you stop their forward momentum without going over the shoulder?
-
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?
Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.
Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...
Yeah but the try was awarded. The disparity you're pointing at I get, but that's a vagary of the law. You'd hate to see everyone YC just because they were last in defence and gave a potential penalty away while still being scored against.
@antipodean who the fuck do you think you are. I would love to see every wallaby carded.
-
@kiwimurph said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.
Not helped by Petaia breaking. Again.
-
Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.
@l_n_p said in Wallabies v Pumas II:
Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.
We made a scrumhalf a fullback/ five-eighth...
-
Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.
