Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies v Pumas II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
australiaargentina
190 Posts 37 Posters 6.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    wrote on last edited by
    #157

    Hodge is podge.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • BonesB Offline
      BonesB Offline
      Bones
      wrote on last edited by
      #158

      So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • DuluthD Offline
        DuluthD Offline
        Duluth
        wrote on last edited by
        #159

        I want to see the old man Greg Holmes recreate his try from 2006

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • BonesB Bones

          So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

          antipodeanA Online
          antipodeanA Online
          antipodean
          wrote on last edited by
          #160

          @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

          So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

          Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

          BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • antipodeanA antipodean

            @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

            So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

            Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

            BonesB Offline
            BonesB Offline
            Bones
            wrote on last edited by
            #161

            @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

            @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

            So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

            Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

            Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

            antipodeanA NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Machpants
              wrote on last edited by
              #162

              Stadium has filled up for the main course

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • O Old Samurai Jack

                Hodge is podge.

                BonesB Offline
                BonesB Offline
                Bones
                wrote on last edited by
                #163

                @old-samurai-jack said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                Hodge is podge.

                Hodge is the player we wish Bridge could be.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • KiwiMurphK Online
                  KiwiMurphK Online
                  KiwiMurph
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #164

                  Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.

                  NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BonesB Bones

                    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                    @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                    So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                    Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                    Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                    antipodeanA Online
                    antipodeanA Online
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #165

                    @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                    @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                    @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                    So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                    Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                    Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                    Yeah but the try was awarded. The disparity you're pointing at I get, but that's a vagary of the law. You'd hate to see everyone YC just because they were last in defence and gave a potential penalty away while still being scored against.

                    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • BonesB Bones

                      @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                      @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                      So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                      Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                      Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                      NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #166

                      @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                      @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                      @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                      So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                      Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                      Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                      Was a discussion point among refs here for these situations where it is close to the line - how do you stop their forward momentum without going over the shoulder?

                      BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                        @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                        @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                        @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                        So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                        Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                        Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                        Yeah but the try was awarded. The disparity you're pointing at I get, but that's a vagary of the law. You'd hate to see everyone YC just because they were last in defence and gave a potential penalty away while still being scored against.

                        BonesB Offline
                        BonesB Offline
                        Bones
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #167

                        @antipodean who the fuck do you think you are. I would love to see every wallaby carded.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                          Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.

                          NTAN Offline
                          NTAN Offline
                          NTA
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #168

                          @kiwimurph said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                          Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.

                          Not helped by Petaia breaking. Again.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • L_n_PL Offline
                            L_n_PL Offline
                            L_n_P
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #169

                            Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

                            antipodeanA boobooB D 3 Replies Last reply
                            4
                            • L_n_PL L_n_P

                              Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

                              antipodeanA Online
                              antipodeanA Online
                              antipodean
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #170

                              @l_n_p said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                              Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

                              We made a scrumhalf a fullback/ five-eighth...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L_n_PL L_n_P

                                Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

                                boobooB Offline
                                boobooB Offline
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #171

                                @l_n_p said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

                                Too small. No kicking game ...

                                L_n_PL 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • NTAN NTA

                                  @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                  Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                  Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                                  Was a discussion point among refs here for these situations where it is close to the line - how do you stop their forward momentum without going over the shoulder?

                                  BonesB Offline
                                  BonesB Offline
                                  Bones
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #172

                                  @nta said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  @antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                  So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

                                  Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

                                  Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

                                  Was a discussion point among refs here for these situations where it is close to the line - how do you stop their forward momentum without going over the shoulder?

                                  I don't really like the reasoning that because I can't stop a player by legal means then I can turn to illegal means. So weak scrums should be allowed to collapse? Defending teams can pull down mauls? Etc

                                  NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • BonesB Bones

                                    Jaco is well past it eh.

                                    antipodeanA Online
                                    antipodeanA Online
                                    antipodean
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #173

                                    @bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

                                    Jaco is well past it eh.

                                    Worth saying again.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • boobooB Offline
                                      boobooB Offline
                                      booboo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #174

                                      Meh ... might have gone pen try there ... but full time, who cares

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • L_n_PL L_n_P

                                        Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Derpus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #175

                                        @l_n_p Lions test out that shit to bed.

                                        L_n_PL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Machpants
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #176

                                          Lol great fact, hooper and lavanini share the record for most cards, still

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search