• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

2021 Wallabies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
81 Posts 29 Posters 2.7k Views
2021 Wallabies
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to NTA on last edited by Derpus
    #56

    @nta still are.

    'Reset' has involved bringing Hooper back and hoping he can single-handedly fix all the problems. Oh and Jed Holloway..?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #57

    @nta said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @antipodean said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @nta said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @derpus said in 2021 Wallabies:

    He struggled with mental health issues and moving to a more disciplined environment away from KFC

    Fixed.

    I could be wildly wrong, but it seemed the Tahs were enamoured of his size and perhaps there wasn't the emphasis to get slimmer to be more mobile and have more involvements. 140kg is a hell of a lot to cart around a professional football field.

    I don't think you're wrong at all, but reckon it extends further: the Tahs were enamoured of not trying to actually achieve anything that couldn't be achieved by just sitting on their arses hoping everything would work out.

    Well that would explain Sydney city planning...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #58

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #59

    It'd be good to see such innovations/targeted tactics that work from our stale coaching set up...

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/10/20/how-dave-rennies-wallabies-are-pushing-the-limits-in-contact/

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/300434061/above-my-pay-grade-quade-cooper-in-the-dark-over-australia-availability

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #61

    @machpants said in 2021 Wallabies:

    It'd be good to see such innovations/targeted tactics that work from our stale coaching set up...

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/10/20/how-dave-rennies-wallabies-are-pushing-the-limits-in-contact/

    Good article but Rennie's 'innovations' only last as long as a complaint from a whinging team to WR (eg England after the Italy game.

    It is quite obvious that the tactic of players in front of the ball at the ruck then moving forward and creating a split in the defence is only working because refs aren't looking for it. Those players are offside when the halfback plays the ball and should not move forward until placed onside.

    The other good coaching at the breakdown shown is good coaching.

    M barbarianB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #62

    @crucial said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @machpants said in 2021 Wallabies:

    It'd be good to see such innovations/targeted tactics that work from our stale coaching set up...

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/10/20/how-dave-rennies-wallabies-are-pushing-the-limits-in-contact/

    Good article but Rennie's 'innovations' only last as long as a complaint from a whinging team to WR (eg England after the Italy game.

    It is quite obvious that the tactic of players in front of the ball at the ruck then moving forward and creating a split in the defence is only working because refs aren't looking for it. Those players are offside when the halfback plays the ball and should not move forward until placed onside.

    The other good coaching at the breakdown shown is good coaching.

    Totally ‘pushing the boundaries’ that’s how you win, it’s smart. If they got caught doing it and how the players react, maybe we’ll never know, then we see how smart the players are!

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Crucial
    #63

    @machpants said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @crucial said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @machpants said in 2021 Wallabies:

    It'd be good to see such innovations/targeted tactics that work from our stale coaching set up...

    https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/10/20/how-dave-rennies-wallabies-are-pushing-the-limits-in-contact/

    Good article but Rennie's 'innovations' only last as long as a complaint from a whinging team to WR (eg England after the Italy game.

    It is quite obvious that the tactic of players in front of the ball at the ruck then moving forward and creating a split in the defence is only working because refs aren't looking for it. Those players are offside when the halfback plays the ball and should not move forward until placed onside.

    The other good coaching at the breakdown shown is good coaching.

    Totally ‘pushing the boundaries’ that’s how you win, it’s smart. If they got caught doing it and how the players react, maybe we’ll never know, then we see how smart the players are!

    The trick is to start these boundary pushes closer to a RWC so the refs dont get instructions to stamp on it or law clarifications can't be put in place. That's the type of thing Eddie does.
    Look at how long he got away with working outside 'the spirit of the game' with Itoje and co yelling and screaming over lineout calls. Only took a directive and refs to tell a few players to shut up and it went away.

    I agree with the article by the way. Rennie does focus on the breakdown as a place to build a good game. Something we could learn from at times.

    EDIT: BTW the Saffas learned from Rennie's ploy of breakdown players in front of the halfback not being noticed by the refs. In the first test against us they used it to get a head start on the kick chase to get numbers into the landing zone.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Crucial on last edited by NTA
    #64

    @crucial said in 2021 Wallabies:

    The trick is to start these boundary pushes closer to a RWC so the refs dont get instructions to stamp on it or law clarifications can't be put in place. That's the type of thing Eddie does.

    On the other hand if it is very close, you might get a snap decision that fucks up the whole event e.g. red cards for lifting tackles in 2011 weren't necessarily bad, but they were a shock to the system.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #65

    @crucial That tactic would be an incredibly hard thing to referee effectively though. It's one thing to identify the tactic, it's another to work out when it is being put in use. A refs eyeline will follow the ball from the ruck, looking at the offside line, high tackles etc. If there is an inside ball or a runner around the ruck it would be difficult to determine what is obstruction and what is just general play.

    It's similar to the tactic used by many teams (especially the ABs) using a line of forward blockers in front of the backline.

    It's relatively easy to police via video but almost impossible in real time. Take the Izack Rodda cleanout used in that example - if Banks had cut through and scored it may have been brought back by the TMO. But I could never see a ref pinging that. The only times they do is when it is especially obvious, taking players 2-3m beyond the ruck.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #66

    @barbarian said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @crucial That tactic would be an incredibly hard thing to referee effectively though. It's one thing to identify the tactic, it's another to work out when it is being put in use. A refs eyeline will follow the ball from the ruck, looking at the offside line, high tackles etc. If there is an inside ball or a runner around the ruck it would be difficult to determine what is obstruction and what is just general play.

    It's similar to the tactic used by many teams (especially the ABs) using a line of forward blockers in front of the backline.

    It's relatively easy to police via video but almost impossible in real time. Take the Izack Rodda cleanout used in that example - if Banks had cut through and scored it may have been brought back by the TMO. But I could never see a ref pinging that. The only times they do is when it is especially obvious, taking players 2-3m beyond the ruck.

    I'm only suggesting that it gets viewed the same way the players advancing ahead of the kick is.
    We know that 'dummy runners' only get pulled back if they obviously interfere with play but at least they start from an onside position. These guys are moving forward ahead of the ball being played and should be easy-ish for the AR watching the ruck offside to call.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #67

    Kerevi, McMahon out as Wallabies eye Beale

    Kurtley Beale has been sounded out for a Wallabies return as coach Dave Rennie grapples with the late Spring Tour withdrawal of Samu Kerevi, Sean McMahon and possibly Quade Cooper.

    Japan-based centre Kerevi and backrower McMahon were both selected for Tests against Scotland, England and Wales next month after the loosening of Rugby Australia's eligibility rules allowed them to return for the Rugby Championship.

    But on Tuesday Rennie confirmed the "nervous" pair would instead honour their Suntory club's wishes and remain in Japan ahead of a January kick-off with the Top League powerhouse.

    Cooper too remains in Japan and Rennie will speak with his Kintetsu Liners club on Wednesday in the hope of gaining access to the five-eighth.

    With Reece Hodge joining fellow fullback Tom Banks on the long-term injury list, the Wallabies backline stocks are thin.

    Rennie said he'd spoken with France-based Beale, who played the last of 92 Tests for the Wallabies in 2019, on Monday about joining the squad as one of potentially several overseas-based reinforcements.


    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #68

    I liked watching Kurtley Beale, are they thinking of 15, 10 or 12 for him? He's 32 now though, how is his speed and form?

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Derpus
    replied to nostrildamus on last edited by Derpus
    #69

    @nostrildamus if KB (as much as i love him) makes it into the side we are pretty much screwed.

    Actually, without Kerevi or Quade we are screwed. RIP tour. I say send a semi-professional development side to Europe. Fuck 'em.

    And veto any attempt for Japan to join the RC until their clubs follow Reg 9.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Derpus on last edited by
    #70

    @derpus said in 2021 Wallabies:

    @nostrildamus if KB (as much as i love him) makes it into the side we are pretty much screwed.

    Actually, without Kerevi or Quade we are screwed. RIP tour. I say send a semi-professional development side to Europe. Fuck 'em.

    Urgh, jesus mate. Why do you do this to yourself? Always doom and gloom.

    Sure, we've lost a few inside backs but on the other hand we're getting to see Latu, Skelton and Arnold.

    JOC will be a fine enough cover at 10 and Paisami will be better for the run at 12. They will do a good job.

    I can't see any reason why we can't aim for 2/3 wins.

    mariner4lifeM nzzpN NTAN 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #71

    @barbarian Quade and Kerevi were huge parts of the massive improvement last month

    but there was definite development everywhere and this should be a pretty exciting tour for Wallaby fans

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    Definitely two guys that the gameplay (and wins) were built around. They were never going to be the long term solution (neither is JOC) but maybe it was the kickstart that the team needed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #73

    @barbarian said in 2021 Wallabies:

    Sure, we've lost a few inside backs but on the other hand we're getting to see Latu, Skelton and Arnold.

    No downside. If you win, it's a bonus - if not ... /shrugs

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    You've got to think that Rennie was banking on having Cooper on tour, otherwise he would have included Lolesio in the squad to provide extra cover.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #75

    @bovidae I'm not so sure - I think Rennie is really keen to have Lolesio and some other young guys (Harry Wilson) take a break and take the EOYT off.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

2021 Wallabies
Sports Talk
australia
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.