• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Movie review thread...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
19.8k Posts 163 Posters 3.2m Views
Movie review thread...
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #15570

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    N Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #15571

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    Yeah right Jennifer Lawrence unrootable, you definitely were not paying attention.

    MN5M KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Nevorian on last edited by
    #15572

    @nevorian said in Movie review thread...:

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    Yeah right Jennifer Lawrence unrootable, you definitely were not paying attention.

    I definitely was

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Nevorian on last edited by
    #15573

    @nevorian said in Movie review thread...:

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    Yeah right Jennifer Lawrence unrootable, you definitely were not paying attention.

    I was starting to think everyone else must be married to supermodels

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #15574

    @kiwiwomble said in Movie review thread...:

    @nevorian said in Movie review thread...:

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    Yeah right Jennifer Lawrence unrootable, you definitely were not paying attention.

    I was starting to think everyone else must be married to supermodels

    Well ok, “unrootable” might be a stretch but rough as fuck compared to her usual high standards.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #15575

    Wife got a 2 week trial of Binge to watch the Harry Potter 20 year special. It was ok. Lot of people who worked in that have died the last 2 decades

    Anyway also in there, being basically HBO Max for Australia, was The Snyder Cut of Justice League.

    I liked the original, but this was next level awesome. Had to run it in 3 syringes at nearly 4 hours, but it was compelling.

    We need more DC, now that they're starting to get it right.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #15576

    Spiderman Home No way back something. Get them all mixed up.

    Bloody good. In fact probably the best Marvel type thing other than the Infinity War films. Was never really into the McGuire or Garfield films but some lovely nostalgia nevertheless.

    A huge step up on recent offerings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nevorian
    replied to MN5 on last edited by Nevorian
    #15577

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    @kiwiwomble said in Movie review thread...:

    @nevorian said in Movie review thread...:

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    Yeah right Jennifer Lawrence unrootable, you definitely were not paying attention.

    I was starting to think everyone else must be married to supermodels

    Well ok, “unrootable” might be a stretch but rough as fuck compared to her usual high standards.

    803657E6-FB76-4AFB-BEF9-99DE3100B7BB.jpeg

    It’s only the fringe letting her down. Cate Blanchett stole the hotness votes though.

    But as for the movie, I didn’t mind it, good satire. 4 comets out of 5 nude planet hoppers

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #15578

    Ghostbusters Afterlife. Tbh this was more of a kids film. But still entertaining and far better than that abomination from a few years back. At the same time pretty pointless and won't rejuvenate the franchise.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor MeldrewV Online
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #15579

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    Don’t look up

    Well, I pointed out that Jennifer Lawrence looked surprisingly unrootable in this and the other half said the same about Leo……brilliant acting from both.

    Kind of a crazy satire on a lot of what is going on the world today, top notch performances from EVERY single actor and pretty entertaining and thought provoking all round. I honestly can’t really give it a rating other than it’s worth seeing but I still haven’t decided if I really “liked” it or not.

    Definitely not everyone’s cup of tea to be fair.

    Yeah, enjoyed it as well.

    Savage satire and darkly comic and, as you say, some great acting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #15580

    @rancid-schnitzel said in Movie review thread...:

    Ghostbusters Afterlife. Tbh this was more of a kids film. But still entertaining and far better than that abomination from a few years back. At the same time pretty pointless and won't rejuvenate the franchise.

    Paul Rudd has a GIGANTIC head in relation to his body. It’s freaky.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #15581

    Verhoeven is making a new movie with the screenwriter from Robocop and Starship Troopers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #15582

    Dune

    Eventually went yesterday with the girl which was cool (didn't think she'd hang with the daggy old man).

    Early session. Only a total of 7 in the cinema including us.

    Overall was slightly disappointed. Think it was because of lot of the dream/vision sequences were difficult to decipher. Too much indistinct whispering. You got the idea but it wouldn't hurt to be just a tiny bit obvious.

    I read the book back in like 3rd Form, and have a couple of times since, so know the story, and was looking for the wow factor on the visuals, but it seems paradoxically there were too many visuals between the narrative bits (for me anyway).

    Liked the actors except for Jason Momoa. Thought he was a bit weak.

    Having said all that am looking forward to Part Two.

    A disappointing 3 why are they using swords in the age of interstellar travel out of 5 those helicopter things look like mosquitos.

    MN5M NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to booboo on last edited by MN5
    #15583

    @booboo said in Movie review thread...:

    Dune

    Eventually went yesterday with the girl which was cool (didn't think she'd hang with the daggy old man).

    Early session. Only a total of 7 in the cinema including us.

    Overall was slightly disappointed. Think it was because of lot of the dream/vision sequences were difficult to decipher. Too much indistinct whispering. You got the idea but it wouldn't hurt to be just a tiny bit obvious.

    I read the book back in like 3rd Form, and have a couple of times since, so know the story, and was looking for the wow factor on the visuals, but it seems paradoxically there were too many visuals between the narrative bits (for me anyway).

    Liked the actors except for Jason Momoa. Thought he was a bit weak.

    Having said all that am looking forward to Part Two.

    A disappointing 3 why are they using swords in the age of interstellar travel out of 5 those helicopter things look like mosquitos.

    Ha I watched Dune for a second time today with the other half.

    A bigger nerd than me like @NTA might know but I think they use swords because everyone has shields so guns are rendered useless ? Also pretty sure some technology was outlawed hence they use scrolls and paper instead of tablets.

    I’ve gotta say I didn’t enjoy it quite as much second time round, it is very well set up for the sequel though.

    It’s better than the 80s version overall, but I wouldn’t have minded seeing the Emperor and the guild navigators.

    KiwiwombleK NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #15584

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    @booboo said in Movie review thread...:

    Dune

    Eventually went yesterday with the girl which was cool (didn't think she'd hang with the daggy old man).

    Early session. Only a total of 7 in the cinema including us.

    Overall was slightly disappointed. Think it was because of lot of the dream/vision sequences were difficult to decipher. Too much indistinct whispering. You got the idea but it wouldn't hurt to be just a tiny bit obvious.

    I read the book back in like 3rd Form, and have a couple of times since, so know the story, and was looking for the wow factor on the visuals, but it seems paradoxically there were too many visuals between the narrative bits (for me anyway).

    Liked the actors except for Jason Momoa. Thought he was a bit weak.

    Having said all that am looking forward to Part Two.

    A disappointing 3 why are they using swords in the age of interstellar travel out of 5 those helicopter things look like mosquitos.

    A bigger nerd than me like @NTA might know but I think they use swords because everyone has shields so guns are rendered useless ?

    That was my understanding and thought they explained that in the movie and book

    Interesting a idea starwars seems to have nicked in the knights of the old republic game, personal shields so people use blades

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #15585

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    A bigger nerd than me like @NTA might know but I think they use swords because everyone has shields so guns are rendered useless ?

    Pretty much. In the books, they go into a more detailed description about how shields work - essentially a fast blade or projectile gets stopped by the shield, so the technique is to beat your opponent with a fast move but a slow finish.

    Lasers exist in hand-held and other forms, but they produce unpredictable results if they hit a shield - up to and including nuke-level devastation.

    Also pretty sure some technology was outlawed hence they use scrolls and paper instead of tablets.

    The Butlerian Jihad is mentioned in the books, as the great war against thinking machines - AI computing. AI brought war to a new level that was deemed too dangerous for the Empire, so they stopped that shit.

    There are a couple of dudes in shot who are mentats - human computers, trained from an early age to run complex computations at sprred. When their eyes roll back in their heads, they're doing stats, retrieving inventory, or calculating probabilities.

    Paper is used but isn't exclusive. There are data storage formats and ways to read them E.g. at the start where Paul is using a firm of projector to learn about the Fremen, but nothing really resembling what we see as a computer.

    MN5M boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    6
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #15586

    @nta said in Movie review thread...:

    @mn5 said in Movie review thread...:

    A bigger nerd than me like @NTA might know but I think they use swords because everyone has shields so guns are rendered useless ?

    Pretty much. In the books, they go into a more detailed description about how shields work - essentially a fast blade or projectile gets stopped by the shield, so the technique is to beat your opponent with a fast move but a slow finish.

    Lasers exist in hand-held and other forms, but they produce unpredictable results if they hit a shield - up to and including nuke-level devastation.

    Also pretty sure some technology was outlawed hence they use scrolls and paper instead of tablets.

    The Butlerian Jihad is mentioned in the books, as the great war against thinking machines - AI computing. AI brought war to a new level that was deemed too dangerous for the Empire, so they stopped that shit.

    There are a couple of dudes in shot who are mentats - human computers, trained from an early age to run complex computations at sprred. When their eyes roll back in their heads, they're doing stats, retrieving inventory, or calculating probabilities.

    Paper is used but isn't exclusive. There are data storage formats and ways to read them E.g. at the start where Paul is using a firm of projector to learn about the Fremen, but nothing really resembling what we see as a computer.

    You sure didn’t let me down. Great post nerdlinger !!!

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #15587

    @mn5 🤓

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #15588

    @nta said in Movie review thread...:

    @mn5 🤓

    Have been meaning to ask, did you think the 80s version was any good ? To me it actually had a couple of scenes the more recent one missed and the Baron was a bit more fun.

    CatograndeC NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by booboo
    #15589

    @nta Olympic level nerding!

    Thanks for that. My mind obviously wandered in those parts of the movie and my memory of the book is not recent.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Movie review thread...
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.