Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.4k Posts 140 Posters 949.4k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Steven Harris

    @kiwimurph will be a good fullback option , after watching the first round ,none of the fullbacks really threw their hands up with the exception of the Reds fullback ,name escapes me.

    NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #3115

    @steven-harris said in Aussie Rugby:

    @kiwimurph will be a good fullback option , after watching the first round ,none of the fullbacks really threw their hands up with the exception of the Reds fullback ,name escapes me.

    Jock Campbell. Looks promising - right height and build. Decent boot and counterattack as well as defence. He's 26 now and probably hitting his straps.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • NTAN NTA

      @steven-harris said in Aussie Rugby:

      @kiwimurph will be a good fullback option , after watching the first round ,none of the fullbacks really threw their hands up with the exception of the Reds fullback ,name escapes me.

      Jock Campbell. Looks promising - right height and build. Decent boot and counterattack as well as defence. He's 26 now and probably hitting his straps.

      KiwiMurphK Online
      KiwiMurphK Online
      KiwiMurph
      wrote on last edited by
      #3116

      @nta said in Aussie Rugby:

      @steven-harris said in Aussie Rugby:

      @kiwimurph will be a good fullback option , after watching the first round ,none of the fullbacks really threw their hands up with the exception of the Reds fullback ,name escapes me.

      Jock Campbell. Looks promising - right height and build. Decent boot and counterattack as well as defence. He's 26 now and probably hitting his straps.

      Looks like he might have bulked up this offseason. He looked a bit frail in previous seasons.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • KiwiwombleK Offline
        KiwiwombleK Offline
        Kiwiwomble
        wrote on last edited by
        #3117

        just kind of noticed, looks like the Red, Tahs and Rebels are all missing jersey sponsors, cant be a good sign for rugby in aus that two of their bigger team cant get a sponsor

        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

          just kind of noticed, looks like the Red, Tahs and Rebels are all missing jersey sponsors, cant be a good sign for rugby in aus that two of their bigger team cant get a sponsor

          NTAN Offline
          NTAN Offline
          NTA
          wrote on last edited by
          #3118

          @kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

          just kind of noticed, looks like the Red, Tahs and Rebels are all missing jersey sponsors, cant be a good sign for rugby in aus that two of their bigger team cant get a sponsor

          ??

          Reds have Westpac on the front of their jersey - was announced late last week and they definitely had them on the front on Saturday.

          Rebels had someone called Ebury on theirs.

          The Tahs are still looking - maybe nobody wants to pay the price HSBC or Volvo did previously?

          KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NTAN NTA

            @kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

            just kind of noticed, looks like the Red, Tahs and Rebels are all missing jersey sponsors, cant be a good sign for rugby in aus that two of their bigger team cant get a sponsor

            ??

            Reds have Westpac on the front of their jersey - was announced late last week and they definitely had them on the front on Saturday.

            Rebels had someone called Ebury on theirs.

            The Tahs are still looking - maybe nobody wants to pay the price HSBC or Volvo did previously?

            KiwiwombleK Offline
            KiwiwombleK Offline
            Kiwiwomble
            wrote on last edited by
            #3119

            @nta ok, when i googled reds and rebels jerseys didnt have a major one of the front but if they came in only last week then the might not have made it to promotional pics etc

            NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

              @nta ok, when i googled reds and rebels jerseys didnt have a major one of the front but if they came in only last week then the might not have made it to promotional pics etc

              NTAN Offline
              NTAN Offline
              NTA
              wrote on last edited by
              #3120

              @kiwiwomble they're not doing much on those "Team" pages - no player stats or anything...

              KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NTAN NTA

                @kiwiwomble they're not doing much on those "Team" pages - no player stats or anything...

                KiwiwombleK Offline
                KiwiwombleK Offline
                Kiwiwomble
                wrote on last edited by
                #3121

                @nta and sponsors have obviously come in after the supporters jerseys were produced, not quite as bad but still not a good sign

                NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                  @nta and sponsors have obviously come in after the supporters jerseys were produced, not quite as bad but still not a good sign

                  NTAN Offline
                  NTAN Offline
                  NTA
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #3122

                  @kiwiwomble You'd think an entire fucking off-season lasting 6 months would allow them the time to sort their shit out.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                    @nta and sponsors have obviously come in after the supporters jerseys were produced, not quite as bad but still not a good sign

                    NTAN Offline
                    NTAN Offline
                    NTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #3123

                    @kiwiwomble https://amp.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/the-value-will-go-up-waratahs-hold-out-in-1m-sponsorship-gamble-20220220-p59y19.html

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NTAN NTA

                      @kiwiwomble https://amp.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/the-value-will-go-up-waratahs-hold-out-in-1m-sponsorship-gamble-20220220-p59y19.html

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Machpants
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #3124

                      @nta said in Aussie Rugby:

                      @kiwiwomble https://amp.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/the-value-will-go-up-waratahs-hold-out-in-1m-sponsorship-gamble-20220220-p59y19.html

                      Time for tahs supporters to buy a replica, less adverts the better! That's why I'm a fan of RWC shirts

                      KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • M Machpants

                        @nta said in Aussie Rugby:

                        @kiwiwomble https://amp.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-union/the-value-will-go-up-waratahs-hold-out-in-1m-sponsorship-gamble-20220220-p59y19.html

                        Time for tahs supporters to buy a replica, less adverts the better! That's why I'm a fan of RWC shirts

                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        Kiwiwomble
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #3125

                        @machpants as a fan agreed, last jersey i bought was 2016 before the highlanders sign pulse energy

                        Queensland welcomed big five bank Westpac to the Reds family on the eve of their opening match against the Rebels, while the Western Force secured the coup of the pre-season signing French industrial company Altrad.
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #3126

                          Bye bye Giteau’s Law, hello to (I think the same as) Wales law

                          https://www.rugbypass.com/news/rugby-australia-end-giteau-law-reveal-new-overseas-player-policy/

                          antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Machpants

                            Bye bye Giteau’s Law, hello to (I think the same as) Wales law

                            https://www.rugbypass.com/news/rugby-australia-end-giteau-law-reveal-new-overseas-player-policy/

                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodean
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #3127

                            @machpants so it was you must be playing in Australia, then you could be overseas but played for the Wallabies 60 times, now it's half that. Entirely predictable slide down the slope to "are you eligible and willing to play for Australia?"

                            M D 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • antipodeanA antipodean

                              @machpants so it was you must be playing in Australia, then you could be overseas but played for the Wallabies 60 times, now it's half that. Entirely predictable slide down the slope to "are you eligible and willing to play for Australia?"

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Machpants
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #3128

                              @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

                              @machpants so it was you must be playing in Australia, then you could be overseas but played for the Wallabies 60 times, now it's half that. Entirely predictable slide down the slope to "are you eligible and willing to play for Australia?"

                              There a max of 3 though, so that’s one tightening of rules

                              NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Machpants

                                @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

                                @machpants so it was you must be playing in Australia, then you could be overseas but played for the Wallabies 60 times, now it's half that. Entirely predictable slide down the slope to "are you eligible and willing to play for Australia?"

                                There a max of 3 though, so that’s one tightening of rules

                                NTAN Offline
                                NTAN Offline
                                NTA
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #3129

                                @machpants not quite open slather, but means a lot of our 2- or 3-season Wallabies can head overseas and take the risk.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • antipodeanA antipodean

                                  @machpants so it was you must be playing in Australia, then you could be overseas but played for the Wallabies 60 times, now it's half that. Entirely predictable slide down the slope to "are you eligible and willing to play for Australia?"

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Derpus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #3130

                                  @antipodean open slather is inevitable. Probably for NZ too, a bit further down the line.

                                  antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • D Derpus

                                    @antipodean open slather is inevitable. Probably for NZ too, a bit further down the line.

                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodean
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #3131

                                    @derpus said in Aussie Rugby:

                                    @antipodean open slather is inevitable. Probably for NZ too, a bit further down the line.

                                    Nah bro, NZR has one hundred billion south pacific pesos now, didn't you hear?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • NTAN Offline
                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTA
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #3132

                                      https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/rugby-union/no-lay-down-mis-re-australia-s-2027-world-cup-bid-hangs-in-the-balance-20220302-p5a119.html

                                      The news comes as Australia’s credibility as a host nation hangs in the balance. The Herald can reveal that with a little more than two months before the World Rugby Council votes to award hosting rights, RA has not yet secured a federal government funding commitment worth about $120 million.

                                      The governing body has locked in a similar amount in state government funding but is yet to receive a commitment from Canberra. A federal government source indicated the Morrison Government was supportive of the bid but potentially not at the price RA was asking.

                                      $120M to have a knock-on tourism effect of at least twice that. In limbo.

                                      $4B disaster fund established after the fires of 2019 that is basically untouched.

                                      $600M for a gas plant in NSW that could be a stranded asset before construction even begins? Shit yeah!

                                      167f19a9-bf84-4109-b11a-fcb2c0b4ef10-image.png

                                      Priorities.

                                      nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • KiwiwombleK Offline
                                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                                        Kiwiwomble
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #3133

                                        thats got to be good news

                                        alt text

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #3134

                                          https://twitter.com/rugbycomau/status/1502919189568233472?t=E9kkNEIIfq5yyTYfCga-qA&s=19

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          6
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search