Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Crusaders v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadershurricanes
373 Posts 46 Posters 18.3k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • get stuffedG get stuffed

    @darren said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @nzbloke said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @mikey07 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris Wow I don’t think there’s enough ABs in that team as much as I bleed yellow and black I have no faith in the Hollandgoround and his selections Saders by at least 12.

    It will be interesting who gets selected for the Canes, put the best team on the park and its a real fight.
    But Holland leaves half your better players in the stand at times.

    Hopefully even that moron Holland will select our best 15 available for this one - crucial we start winning some matches in a row too, will be embarrassing if we miss out on the top 8 in the play-offs.

    I really don't think he has any clue what our best 15 is.

    Yeah, he's really clueless, if the players know Holland is going to coach the Canes next season reckon a fair few of them will leave at the end of this years comp... a coach has to earn the respect of the players, can't see any of the players having much respect for him.

    HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    wrote on last edited by Higgins
    #45

    @nzbloke said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @darren said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @nzbloke said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @mikey07 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

    @chris Wow I don’t think there’s enough ABs in that team as much as I bleed yellow and black I have no faith in the Hollandgoround and his selections Saders by at least 12.

    It will be interesting who gets selected for the Canes, put the best team on the park and its a real fight.
    But Holland leaves half your better players in the stand at times.

    Hopefully even that moron Holland will select our best 15 available for this one - crucial we start winning some matches in a row too, will be embarrassing if we miss out on the top 8 in the play-offs.

    I really don't think he has any clue what our best 15 is.

    Yeah, he's really clueless, if the players know Holland is going to coach the Canes next season reckon a fair few of them will leave at the end of this years comp... a coach has to earn the respect of the players, can't see any of the players having much respect for him.

    Well I can, J. Garden-Bachop, R. Prinsep, A. Fidow, B. Proctor, J. Blackwell, B. Gibson, D. Bird, T. Lomax would be on the Board of Directors of the Jason Holland Appreciation Society. I am unsure about which side of the fence P. Patafilo sits as he never actually plays.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • HigginsH Higgins

      @nzbloke said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

      @darren said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

      @nzbloke said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

      @chris said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

      @mikey07 said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

      @chris Wow I don’t think there’s enough ABs in that team as much as I bleed yellow and black I have no faith in the Hollandgoround and his selections Saders by at least 12.

      It will be interesting who gets selected for the Canes, put the best team on the park and its a real fight.
      But Holland leaves half your better players in the stand at times.

      Hopefully even that moron Holland will select our best 15 available for this one - crucial we start winning some matches in a row too, will be embarrassing if we miss out on the top 8 in the play-offs.

      I really don't think he has any clue what our best 15 is.

      Yeah, he's really clueless, if the players know Holland is going to coach the Canes next season reckon a fair few of them will leave at the end of this years comp... a coach has to earn the respect of the players, can't see any of the players having much respect for him.

      Well I can, J. Garden-Bachop, R. Prinsep, A. Fidow, B. Proctor, J. Blackwell, B. Gibson, D. Bird, T. Lomax would be on the Board of Directors of the Jason Holland Appreciation Society. I am unsure about which side of the fence P. Patafilo sits as he never actually plays.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      mikey07
      wrote on last edited by mikey07
      #46

      @higgins You forgot James O’Reilly and Julian Savea.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • sharkS Offline
        sharkS Offline
        shark
        wrote on last edited by
        #47

        Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

        F CrucialC HigginsH KiwiMurphK 4 Replies Last reply
        1
        • sharkS shark

          Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

          F Offline
          F Offline
          foobaNZ
          wrote on last edited by
          #48

          @shark

          I think most Canes (and NZ rugby fans) like JB at 12.

          But what irks Canes fans is that Holland took 5 games to decide this, and he has dropped (completely out of the 23) a really good 12 to allow for it.

          We also don't have a 15 other than JB of any real quality where as PUJ is an excellent 12. So PUJ at 12 and JB at 15 is better based on the current Canes squad.

          If JB has to be at 12, then at least put PUJ at 13.

          Hopefully Moorby goes okay at 15 as Love ain't good there. Needs to be at 10.

          CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sharkS shark

            Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

            CrucialC Offline
            CrucialC Offline
            Crucial
            wrote on last edited by
            #49

            @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

            Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

            I wouldn't give Holland credit in this regard. He has put Jordie there as about 7th or 8th attempt from his squad. FFS he even played Julian Savea there before him.

            get stuffedG 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • F foobaNZ

              @shark

              I think most Canes (and NZ rugby fans) like JB at 12.

              But what irks Canes fans is that Holland took 5 games to decide this, and he has dropped (completely out of the 23) a really good 12 to allow for it.

              We also don't have a 15 other than JB of any real quality where as PUJ is an excellent 12. So PUJ at 12 and JB at 15 is better based on the current Canes squad.

              If JB has to be at 12, then at least put PUJ at 13.

              Hopefully Moorby goes okay at 15 as Love ain't good there. Needs to be at 10.

              CrucialC Offline
              CrucialC Offline
              Crucial
              wrote on last edited by
              #50

              @foobanz said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

              @shark

              I think most Canes (and NZ rugby fans) like JB at 12.

              But what irks Canes fans is that Holland took 5 games to decide this, and he has dropped (completely out of the 23) a really good 12 to allow for it.

              We also don't have a 15 other than JB of any real quality where as PUJ is an excellent 12. So PUJ at 12 and JB at 15 is better based on the current Canes squad.

              If JB has to be at 12, then at least put PUJ at 13.

              Hopefully Moorby goes okay at 15 as Love ain't good there. Needs to be at 10.

              Yep. From a non Canes pov seeing how JB goes at 12 is a bonus. Judging him based on school rugby and a handful of NPC games in a weak comp is hardly a good indicator. Ardie was a great 12 at school.
              If he doesn't set the world on fire there and plays out the season at 12 how does that work for the ABs? I'd then be tempted to play Jordan with JB on the bench.

              From a Canes pov it should be about balancing and best use of resources. I also have a concern about JBs 'rugby smarts'. He's never come across as the smartest bloke on the paddock.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sharkS shark

                Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

                HigginsH Offline
                HigginsH Offline
                Higgins
                wrote on last edited by
                #51

                @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

                It is noted that it has taken him a season and a half to do so.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sharkS shark

                  Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

                  KiwiMurphK Offline
                  KiwiMurphK Offline
                  KiwiMurph
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #52

                  @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                  Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

                  Holland started Jordie at 12 in 2019 for a game too. Obviously Laumape was around but I think they could have given Jordie more opportunities at 12 over the years.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • TimT Offline
                    TimT Offline
                    Tim
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #53

                    Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                    O CrucialC Dan54D 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • TimT Tim

                      Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Old Samurai Jack
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #54

                      @tim Interesting question. What is the reasoning?

                      TimT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Old Samurai Jack

                        @tim Interesting question. What is the reasoning?

                        TimT Offline
                        TimT Offline
                        Tim
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #55

                        @old-samurai-jack Getting low enough for head on tackles. Could put at risk of penalty/card for a high shot.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #56

                          No different than locks that often defend similar areas, not a problem IMO

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • TimT Tim

                            Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                            CrucialC Offline
                            CrucialC Offline
                            Crucial
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #57

                            @tim said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                            Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                            Interesting point with the lower tackle height requirements.
                            He's the height of a lock and they dont have issues close in. In the open it hasnt been an issue either but yeah, at 12 there are sometimes those middle ground issues of wanting to wrap the ball up but having less time to adjust.
                            Doesn't look like a problem for him.

                            TimT 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • CrucialC Crucial

                              @tim said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                              Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                              Interesting point with the lower tackle height requirements.
                              He's the height of a lock and they dont have issues close in. In the open it hasnt been an issue either but yeah, at 12 there are sometimes those middle ground issues of wanting to wrap the ball up but having less time to adjust.
                              Doesn't look like a problem for him.

                              TimT Offline
                              TimT Offline
                              Tim
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #58

                              @crucial I'd imagine that the difference with a lock is that a 12 has to cover more ground with sliding on defence, so isn't as "set" for a front on tackle as a lock?

                              Hopefully won't be a problem.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • TimT Tim

                                Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                                Dan54D Offline
                                Dan54D Offline
                                Dan54
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #59

                                @tim said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                Anyone worry that Barrett's height might be a defensive disadvantage at 12?

                                Dunno perhaps ask Josh Ioane how his rubs are, and how high they are.
                                But naa mate tackling at 12 is same as tackling at 15 in being able to lower height.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • CrucialC Crucial

                                  @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                  Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

                                  I wouldn't give Holland credit in this regard. He has put Jordie there as about 7th or 8th attempt from his squad. FFS he even played Julian Savea there before him.

                                  get stuffedG Offline
                                  get stuffedG Offline
                                  get stuffed
                                  wrote on last edited by get stuffed
                                  #60

                                  @crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                  @shark said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                  Good to see Barrett get another crack at 12. Say what you like about Holland but he's the first coach to select Barrett in what I believe is his best position since he debuted in the NPC for Canterbury. I've been suggesting this for years.

                                  I wouldn't give Holland credit in this regard. He has put Jordie there as about 7th or 8th attempt from his squad. FFS he even played Julian Savea there before him.

                                  Reckon it's much more about J.Barrett wanting to play at 12, rather than Holland wanting him to play there.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    Wreck Diver
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #61

                                    Anyone know when Dane Coles will be back?

                                    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W Wreck Diver

                                      Anyone know when Dane Coles will be back?

                                      HigginsH Offline
                                      HigginsH Offline
                                      Higgins
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #62

                                      @wreck-diver
                                      He is not in the Poneke lineup for today so might still be carrying an injury. If I see him watching his guys at Hataitai Park I will see what I can find out for you.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • BonesB Bones

                                        @crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                        Pretty sure there was an AB XV rolled out at some stage last year that wasn’t much different

                                        @ACT-Crusader

                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT Crusader
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #63

                                        @bones said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                        @crucial said in Crusaders v Hurricanes:

                                        Pretty sure there was an AB XV rolled out at some stage last year that wasn’t much different

                                        @ACT-Crusader

                                        Take away 3, 5, 6 and 9 and it’s 2002 again 😉

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • StargazerS Offline
                                          StargazerS Offline
                                          Stargazer
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #64

                                          https://twitter.com/crusadersrugby/status/1512642220259778565

                                          DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search