Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Final: Blues vs Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
1.1k Posts 72 Posters 87.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K kev

    @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

    Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

    Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
    Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

    Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

    BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

    broughieB Offline
    broughieB Offline
    broughie
    wrote on last edited by
    #996

    @kev at what position though? 1st five because I wouldn’t have him at FB. Leave that to Jordie and Jordan if either subbed or moved.

    Whole game disappointing as a Blues fan. The Crusaders are smart and play the team game. They don’t make stupid handling errors when they are building momentum. They can think on their feet while the Blues are still trying to figure out how to win a line out. Might have been better to throw to the props in the front or can you roll the ball along the ground? Just thinking outside the box options that would have been better than padding Whitlock's stats. It wouldn’t have be expected and at least there would be a competition. They are not isolated in the carry. And well coached. Robinson should just play 6. Makeshift lock during the regular season but just didn’t cut it. Goodhue lacked big time. Akira’s defense is good but I wish he would run straight but then the support needs to be there to clean out the ruck. Never threw once to him and he has been a handy option in the past.

    Oh well. I guess they are improving.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • Billy TellB Billy Tell

      @Victor-Meldrew said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

      @Billy-Tell said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

      Pretty much agree, except for this:

      Akira was AWOL. Switch Crusaders for SA or Ireland, and is he our 6?

      Along with the other loosies, he kept the Blues in it - amazing it was only 16-0 at HT. . Sure, he wasn't rocking it up like Hoskins, but he was doing the hard yakka, engine-room stuff.

      If you say so. Blues pack was buried in the first half. Not a single blues forward played better than their opponent in the first 40.

      TBH the biggest AB selection problem is the props.

      Victor MeldrewV Offline
      Victor MeldrewV Offline
      Victor Meldrew
      wrote on last edited by
      #997

      @Billy-Tell said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

      TBH the biggest AB selection problem is the props.

      Yep.

      Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • Victor MeldrewV Victor Meldrew

        @Billy-Tell said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

        TBH the biggest AB selection problem is the props.

        Yep.

        Billy TellB Offline
        Billy TellB Offline
        Billy Tell
        wrote on last edited by
        #998

        @Victor-Meldrew said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

        @Billy-Tell said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

        TBH the biggest AB selection problem is the props.

        Yep.

        I’m not the biggest Jager fan although I’m coming round but compare his accurate work rate to laulala. As for the blues replacement AB props they were no better and arguably worse than the 2 crusaders rookies. Given that KT is going overseas and that he is all sorts of mediocre it’s the worst AB selection since maybe Atiga in 2003.

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • Jailbreak7J Jailbreak7

          Difference was the Saders had a completely simple and unshakeable gameplan. Tackle. Possession. Tackle. Run, Territory. Tackle. Everyone do their job. Did I mention tackle. Hard to see what the Blues gameplan was.

          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugby
          wrote on last edited by
          #999

          @Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.

          It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.

          It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.

          BovidaeB Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
          4
          • D Dolamite

            Has there ever been a worse line out performance from a team than we saw tonight? Blues must have lost 10 line outs at least

            WingerW Offline
            WingerW Offline
            Winger
            wrote on last edited by
            #1000

            @Dolamite said in Blues 2022:

            Has there ever been a worse line out performance from a team than we saw tonight? Blues must have lost 10 line outs at least

            According to this they were 9/19

            https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/300616624/crusaders-player-ratings-ruthless-sam-whitelock-destroys-blues-lineout

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Dan54D Offline
              Dan54D Offline
              Dan54
              wrote on last edited by
              #1001

              I watched last night with a lot of family here, so will enjoy watching again, to see how good or bad the Blues pack were. I really thought the bath Crudadres gave them in lineout seemed to be start and almost the main cause of their problems, I can't recall such a lesson for quite sometime.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kiwiinmelbK Offline
                kiwiinmelbK Offline
                kiwiinmelb
                wrote on last edited by
                #1002

                Yeah I’m not sure who starts between beaudy and Richie . I don’t have a preference tbh .

                But I do think we have to be careful thinking all our answers to selections were in that game when the similar issues keep arising at test level with both of them

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • BovidaeB Offline
                  BovidaeB Offline
                  Bovidae
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1003

                  There was a simple fix to the Blues lineout woes, i.e., get Robinson up quickly at the front. That was assuming the lifters were doing their job, often the cause of the problems they were having.

                  taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                    @Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.

                    It started with the lineout, Whitelock owned it, psyched out Eklund and the blues jumpers, allowing total domination, then everything flowed on from there.

                    It was a masterclass from the senior players in the saders and Razor, hopefully will give Fozzie some ideas cos the Blues looked overawed like the ABS were at times last year.

                    BovidaeB Offline
                    BovidaeB Offline
                    Bovidae
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1004

                    @taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                    @Jailbreak7 thing was, the Crusaders denied the blues any opportunity to show thier game plan.

                    It couldn't help thinking that the Blues backs might have enjoyed playing behind the Chiefs forwards a week earlier.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BovidaeB Bovidae

                      There was a simple fix to the Blues lineout woes, i.e., get Robinson up quickly at the front. That was assuming the lifters were doing their job, often the cause of the problems they were having.

                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1005

                      @Bovidae it was the perfect storm, some of Eklunds throws were poor, some was timing, some was lifters...once Whitelock was in the blues head, they couldn't seem to change it.

                      Although like you say, they shoulda stayed at front and won a few to just try to build some phases and hold the ball.

                      CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        @Bovidae it was the perfect storm, some of Eklunds throws were poor, some was timing, some was lifters...once Whitelock was in the blues head, they couldn't seem to change it.

                        Although like you say, they shoulda stayed at front and won a few to just try to build some phases and hold the ball.

                        CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1006

                        @taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                        @Bovidae it was the perfect storm, some of Eklunds throws were poor, some was timing, some was lifters...once Whitelock was in the blues head, they couldn't seem to change it.

                        Although like you say, they shoulda stayed at front and won a few to just try to build some phases and hold the ball.

                        When Ofa came on to replace Laulala you could see Laulala having a frustrated moan about something to him. Whether it had to do with the line out I don’t know but it seemed so.
                        Communication breakdowns between jumpers and lifters?
                        I’m no lineout expert but I was surprised that the Blues did little to disrupt the Saders contesting. There were no shuffles and attempts to throw to the unexpected spot. They just kept trying the same 3 or 5 plays and getting picked off. Where was the leadership there? I thought Robinson would have stepped up.

                        taniwharugbyT J 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • J junior

                          @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                          @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                          Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                          Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                          Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                          Yep, that match told us absolutely nothing about the 10s that we didn't already know. RM is a god at Super level and a magician when he gets an armchair ride from his pack. BB is shit, runs sideways and shovels terrible passes when he doesn't get an armchair ride.

                          The only potentially relevant outcome of that match so far as the AB 10 is concerned, is that RM may get first dibs at shitting the bed against the Irish (or conversely dominating if the AB pack gets the ascendancy).

                          CrucialC Offline
                          CrucialC Offline
                          Crucial
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1007

                          @junior said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                          @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                          @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                          Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                          Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                          Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                          Yep, that match told us absolutely nothing about the 10s that we didn't already know. RM is a god at Super level and a magician when he gets an armchair ride from his pack. BB is shit, runs sideways and shovels terrible passes when he doesn't get an armchair ride.

                          The only potentially relevant outcome of that match so far as the AB 10 is concerned, is that RM may get first dibs at shitting the bed against the Irish (or conversely dominating if the AB pack gets the ascendancy).

                          Totally agree and it is one of our problems at test level when our forwards can’t dominate. We have two brilliantly skilfull 10s that are ineffective when the heat comes on.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • CrucialC Crucial

                            @taniwharugby said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                            @Bovidae it was the perfect storm, some of Eklunds throws were poor, some was timing, some was lifters...once Whitelock was in the blues head, they couldn't seem to change it.

                            Although like you say, they shoulda stayed at front and won a few to just try to build some phases and hold the ball.

                            When Ofa came on to replace Laulala you could see Laulala having a frustrated moan about something to him. Whether it had to do with the line out I don’t know but it seemed so.
                            Communication breakdowns between jumpers and lifters?
                            I’m no lineout expert but I was surprised that the Blues did little to disrupt the Saders contesting. There were no shuffles and attempts to throw to the unexpected spot. They just kept trying the same 3 or 5 plays and getting picked off. Where was the leadership there? I thought Robinson would have stepped up.

                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                            #1008

                            @Crucial he like many of the blues were deers in headlights, they were in hole and unable to get out, big game experience won through

                            Didn't have a backup plan, unable to get any rhythm in thier own game, well unable to just play any rugby to put any pressure on the Crusaders.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                              @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                              Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                              Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                              Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

                              BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

                              It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

                              Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

                              CrucialC Offline
                              CrucialC Offline
                              Crucial
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1009

                              @KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                              Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                              Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                              Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                              Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

                              BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

                              It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

                              Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

                              His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.

                              No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • KirwanK Offline
                                KirwanK Offline
                                Kirwan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1010

                                First off congratulations to the Crusaders, hell of a finals performance and very good coaching/tactics.

                                Basically came down to the line out, where were completely dominated. Game was lost there, Crusaders could kick everything out and keep the ball and starve us of possession.

                                Leon will learn from this, and I bet if he had his time again he would start Tucker instead of Robinson. The players really didn’t adjust on the field either, as has been mentioned already, where were the shortened lineouts or jumping at the front?

                                As the weather turned over the past 4/5 weeks you could see issues at the lineout in a few games. It’s an area we will need to improve a lot.

                                However, the Blues have been steadily improving each year, and with Patrick coming back next year we have more lineout options and bulk for the scrum.

                                For the positives, our defence was phenomenal. A real point of difference in previous years. Particularly good on the goal line and the team never gives up.

                                I see the trolls are out for Akira, again he was great for us, worked hard, moving bodies at the ruck and for those not paying attention to where the Blues put their six , staying in the team pattern. Robinson(at six) and Dalton both stay wide too.

                                Dalton is the best seven in the country by a mile, Sotutu the best 8, and Akira the best six. Without them, with losing that many lineouts, the Crusaders would put 40 on other teams. It’s a positive for the ABs that they were still so good with the front five being taken apart.

                                Anyway, was a fun year as a Blues fan, and looking forward to next year.

                                CrucialC Billy TellB 2 Replies Last reply
                                6
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                  I don't think Mo'unga really took control of that game, despite the front foot ball and wealth of possession handed to him. What I do remember is all of the Saders backs kicking for the corner and playing the territory game - Jordan, Havili, even Reece put one over the touchline in the Blues 22. The best part of that performance from the Saders was that the whole team was on the same page and trying to execute the same gameplan, rather than Mo'unga taking control of the game himself - he's just not that kind of 10. Neither is Beauden. I don't think that game would have changed much in the selectors eyes, particularly for the first test where I'd say there would be concerns about Mo'unga's defense being exposed by the big Irish loosies running through his channel.

                                  I'd be extremely surpsied if it wasn't Beauden 10 with Mo'unga on the bench to start with, that is what they favoured last season as well.

                                  I’m not advocating for Richie to start ahead of Barrett in the first test, I still think it should be Beaudie, but you could see tonight Richie’s organisation of our attack line. From the vision on the TV at least you could see him communicating and he varied the point of attack quite a bit. His kicking was good but I think his passing was better. He drew in attention from more than one defender which helped his team mates. I thought he played a pretty mature game tonight.

                                  His defence was pretty good tonight, didn’t miss a tackle from the stats I saw. That’s a plus!!

                                  No QuarterN Offline
                                  No QuarterN Offline
                                  No Quarter
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1011

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                  @No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                  I don't think Mo'unga really took control of that game, despite the front foot ball and wealth of possession handed to him. What I do remember is all of the Saders backs kicking for the corner and playing the territory game - Jordan, Havili, even Reece put one over the touchline in the Blues 22. The best part of that performance from the Saders was that the whole team was on the same page and trying to execute the same gameplan, rather than Mo'unga taking control of the game himself - he's just not that kind of 10. Neither is Beauden. I don't think that game would have changed much in the selectors eyes, particularly for the first test where I'd say there would be concerns about Mo'unga's defense being exposed by the big Irish loosies running through his channel.

                                  I'd be extremely surpsied if it wasn't Beauden 10 with Mo'unga on the bench to start with, that is what they favoured last season as well.

                                  I’m not advocating for Richie to start ahead of Barrett in the first test, I still think it should be Beaudie, but you could see tonight Richie’s organisation of our attack line. From the vision on the TV at least you could see him communicating and he varied the point of attack quite a bit. His kicking was good but I think his passing was better. He drew in attention from more than one defender which helped his team mates. I thought he played a pretty mature game tonight.

                                  His defence was pretty good tonight, didn’t miss a tackle from the stats I saw. That’s a plus!!

                                  Mo'unga played well for sure, and I'd love to see him play like that for the ABs. But the armchair ride he got from his tight 5 is a far cry from anything he'll get against Ireland and SA. Which is why I say that game didn't really tell us anything we didn't already know. Beauden can handle the physical exchanges a lot better, him starting and then bringing Mo'unga off the bench against a tiring and less structured defense is the best use of their talents.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • KirwanK Kirwan

                                    First off congratulations to the Crusaders, hell of a finals performance and very good coaching/tactics.

                                    Basically came down to the line out, where were completely dominated. Game was lost there, Crusaders could kick everything out and keep the ball and starve us of possession.

                                    Leon will learn from this, and I bet if he had his time again he would start Tucker instead of Robinson. The players really didn’t adjust on the field either, as has been mentioned already, where were the shortened lineouts or jumping at the front?

                                    As the weather turned over the past 4/5 weeks you could see issues at the lineout in a few games. It’s an area we will need to improve a lot.

                                    However, the Blues have been steadily improving each year, and with Patrick coming back next year we have more lineout options and bulk for the scrum.

                                    For the positives, our defence was phenomenal. A real point of difference in previous years. Particularly good on the goal line and the team never gives up.

                                    I see the trolls are out for Akira, again he was great for us, worked hard, moving bodies at the ruck and for those not paying attention to where the Blues put their six , staying in the team pattern. Robinson(at six) and Dalton both stay wide too.

                                    Dalton is the best seven in the country by a mile, Sotutu the best 8, and Akira the best six. Without them, with losing that many lineouts, the Crusaders would put 40 on other teams. It’s a positive for the ABs that they were still so good with the front five being taken apart.

                                    Anyway, was a fun year as a Blues fan, and looking forward to next year.

                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    Crucial
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1012

                                    @Kirwan said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                    For the positives, our defence was phenomenal. A real point of difference in previous years.

                                    I think you will find that the stats over the past few years have had them at or near the top of the standings in tackle %s and line breaks conceded.
                                    Saders knew as much and went out to stop the Blues getting anything going rather than have to score themselves

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CrucialC Crucial

                                      @KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                                      Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                                      Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                                      Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

                                      BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

                                      It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

                                      Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

                                      His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.

                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No Quarter
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1013

                                      @Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                      Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                                      Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                                      Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                                      Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

                                      BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

                                      It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

                                      Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

                                      His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.

                                      I don't remember many touchfinders from Beauden at all last night, most of the poor kicking came from Christie box kicking it into touch for about a 5m gain.

                                      My biggest criticism of Beauden last night was that he didn't demand the ball from Christie when it was clear Christie was having a shocker. If DC had a 9 inside him playing like that he would have demanded the ball every time so that he could make the decisions instead - that's what we really lack from both our 10s right now, when shit is hitting the fan neither of them take control of the situation.

                                      CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                        @Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                                        Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                                        Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                                        Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

                                        BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

                                        It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

                                        Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

                                        His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.

                                        I don't remember many touchfinders from Beauden at all last night, most of the poor kicking came from Christie box kicking it into touch for about a 5m gain.

                                        My biggest criticism of Beauden last night was that he didn't demand the ball from Christie when it was clear Christie was having a shocker. If DC had a 9 inside him playing like that he would have demanded the ball every time so that he could make the decisions instead - that's what we really lack from both our 10s right now, when shit is hitting the fan neither of them take control of the situation.

                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        Crucial
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1014

                                        @No-Quarter said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Crucial said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @KiwiMurph said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @kev said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Machpants said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        @Stag said in Final: Blues vs Crusaders:

                                        Hopefully all the crap floating around about Barrett just walking into the number 10 jersey for the first test against Ireland has been flushed down the dunny

                                        Problem is both Mounga and Barrett are flash players, with no disrespect. Give them a platform and they will tear you apart. Beaudy tears the hardest but kicks shit, Mounga kicks better but is a liability on defence. We don't have a ten in the ABs (NZ?) that can tactically take control in the traditional way, with their kicking and intelligence like DC used to. Or most NH tens are focused on. They can pile on the points when we're dominant up front, and often pull some blinders out of nowhere even when pressured. But can mounga or Beaudy take control when on the back foot? Nope.
                                        Most teams need to win upfront, with our tens ABs are much more susceptable to shitting the bed if the forward don't provide the ball needed. I'd still take Beaudy over mounga, cos he has a higher ceiling, but the ABs need a 10 (or a nine) that can act as a tactical general, rather than flash awesome individual> this is especially relelvant with our tight forwards being handed their arses every time we play a big NH team. But we don;t have the forwards and we don't have the tens. And playing off nine is verbotten since Lions 1, so no idea what fozzies genius plan is to get around this

                                        Mounga’s kicking game was superb tonight. BB was crap this week and last week. Hands down Mounga starts.

                                        BB is much better off the bench as a super sub.

                                        It's so much easier to kick well tactically when you get forwards handing it to you on a silver platter. And not under any real pressure. So I disagree

                                        Beaudy is not a particularly good punter though. He never has been.

                                        His whole kicking game from hand (apart from the odd kick pass) is terrible. He hasn’t improved much over time either. His touch finders last night were rubbish. Gaining bout 20m max. Arrogance to not hand the kicking to Perofeta.

                                        I don't remember many touchfinders from Beauden at all last night, most of the poor kicking came from Christie box kicking it into touch for about a 5m gain.

                                        My biggest criticism of Beauden last night was that he didn't demand the ball from Christie when it was clear Christie was having a shocker. If DC had a 9 inside him playing like that he would have demanded the ball every time so that he could make the decisions instead - that's what we really lack from both our 10s right now, when shit is hitting the fan neither of them take control of the situation.

                                        BB is a shocking captain was my take. They needed someone to pull the heads around from being 'deer in the headlights' and re-focus

                                        No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • taniwharugbyT Offline
                                          taniwharugbyT Offline
                                          taniwharugby
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1015

                                          As much as any team doesn't want to rely on one player, the Blues are a different side without Dalton, last week they were exposed, and maybe that started sowing the seeds of doubt, when he came on, it was too late, but you could see the lift in the team.

                                          KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search