Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v Wales Test #3

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblackswales
562 Posts 72 Posters 86.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DMX
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Another dead rubber test, I was much happier when we had two tests and a third against someone else.Thenwe could have looked forward to England or Ireland coming. The whole 3 test thing seemed like a copout, extra insurance in case one of the SH teams lose a test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • boobooB Offline
      boobooB Offline
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="sparky" data-cid="589803" data-time="1466348575"><p>
      Team I'd pick<br><br>
      Moody, Coles, Franks, Whitelock, Retallick, Dixon, Cane, Read, A Smith, Sopoaga, Naholo, Crotty, Tamanuvalu, Ben Smith, Dagg<br><br>
      Bench: Crocckett, Taylor, Fauminia, Tuipolutu, A Savea, TJP, Beauden Barrett, Moala</p></blockquote>
      <br>
      I'd go for this team too (with the names spelled correctly. 🙂 )

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • MN5M Online
        MN5M Online
        MN5
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pooler fan" data-cid="589774" data-time="1466327529">
        <div>
        <p>From a Welsh perspective, I think we improved a little yesterday & I'd expect a little more next week.<br>
        Personally I think they could do with taking a couple of risks squad wise. <strong>I'd seriously consider leaving Roberts out </strong>or at least removing him after 45/50 minutes. The guy looked in bits after 50 mins yesterday, was out on his feet. Scott Williams was poor against Waikato but offers far more offensively, especially when the game opens up.<br>
        Also they have to put Matthew Morgan on the bench & give him 30mins. We've got nothing to lose at this point. If he gets mashed on defence a couple of times who cares, let's see if he can create something.<br>
        Series has gone let's try to evolve our game & play more positive rugby.</p>
        </div>
        </blockquote>
        <p> </p>
        <p>I know Barrett is incredibly quick but he ran Roberts down with ease. I reckon that and the missed tackles may have been down to him playing on when he shouldn't have. He did the same early in his career after a collision with Stirling Mortlock. One would think a doctor should be a bit smarter about such things.</p>

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MilkM Offline
          MilkM Offline
          Milk
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="589817" data-time="1466366534">
          <div>
          <p>Another dead rubber test, I was much happier when we had two tests and a third against someone else.Thenwe could have looked forward to England or Ireland coming. The whole 3 test thing seemed like a copout, extra insurance in case one of the SH teams lose a test.</p>
          </div>
          </blockquote>
          <p> </p>
          <p>I don't consider it a dead rubber. We still have a proud 60 year record to protect against Wales.</p>

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gt12G Offline
            gt12G Offline
            gt12
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="sparky" data-cid="589803" data-time="1466348575"><p>Team I'd pick<br><br>
            Moody, Coles, Franks, Whitelock, Retallick, Dixon, Cane, Read, A Smith, Sopoaga, Naholo, Crotty, Tamanuvalu, Ben Smith, Dagg<br><br>
            Bench: Crocckett, Taylor, Fauminia, Tuipolutu, A Savea, TJP, Beauden Barrett, Moala</p></blockquote>
            <br>
            Almost exactly what I'd pick - I'd be tempted to give J Savea a run (for Naholo), put Squire on the bench (for Ardie), and the midfield/bench would depend on Fekitoa's fitness.<br><br>
            I think they'll pick Sparky's team switching Barrett for Sopoaga, with midfield depending on fitness. You'd think they would want to give Squire time, but maybe not this test.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              hydro11
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="DMX" data-cid="589817" data-time="1466366534">
              <div>
              <p>Another dead rubber test, I was much happier when we had two tests and a third against someone else.Thenwe could have looked forward to England or Ireland coming. The whole 3 test thing seemed like a copout, extra insurance in case one of the SH teams lose a test.</p>
              </div>
              </blockquote>
              <p>I'm glad we get a third game between Ireland and South Africa and Australia and England.</p>

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • MN5M Online
                MN5M Online
                MN5
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="589843" data-time="1466377973">
                <div>
                <p>I'm glad we get a third game between Ireland and South Africa and Australia and England.</p>
                </div>
                </blockquote>
                <p>Any idea why the IRB have decided to bring the three test series back ? they're as rare as an Owen Franks clean break.</p>

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DMX
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Milk" data-cid="589833" data-time="1466374690">
                  <div>
                  <p>I don't consider it a dead rubber. We still have a proud 60 year record to protect against Wales.</p>
                  </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <p> </p>
                  <p>Thats exactly my point, two tests is enough, a tied series would still have ended up being a victory for Wales anyway, would be far more interested in a one off test against one of the other nations. That we dont want to lose to Wales is the same as every test match. Out of the last 8 or so 3 test series in the southern hemisphere I think the  only non-Lions series going to a decider is Ireland/SA and even that is just giving SA a chance to save face. </p>

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • HoorooH Do not disturb
                    HoorooH Do not disturb
                    Hooroo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    <p>I just don't understand your train of thought. 3 tests series are the best. I love it that there is a third test.  If it was 1 each I would be bitterly disappointed that there was no third test</p>

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • boobooB Offline
                      boobooB Offline
                      booboo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      I know there is talk of starting Barrett and moving him out to 14/15 later in the game.<br><br>
                      I just think his effectiveness at a weapon will be reduced if he's got some miles on the clock instead of hitting the field fresh.<br><br>
                      Can't see a way of getting Squire in. Would require leaving Ardie or Pat T off the bench reducing it's effectiveness.<br><br>
                      I don't think the margins are that big that we can take Wales at all lightly.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mariner4lifeM Online
                        mariner4lifeM Online
                        mariner4life
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        <p>Wales finished the last test full of running. They are not a broken side by any stretch of the imagination, and i would imagine the selectors will be putting another full strength side out. </p>

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                          Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                          Baron Silas Greenback
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          <p>Have the coaches said anything about Harris being selected ahead of Taylor for the first 2 tests?</p>
                          <p> </p>
                          <p>Because unless they have, I think everyone's assumption that Taylor is ahead in the pecking order is a bit premature.</p>

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            <p>bro, if we don't have assumptions that we know shit, we have nothing!</p>

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • MilkM Offline
                              MilkM Offline
                              Milk
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="589879" data-time="1466384712">
                              <div>
                              <p>I know there is talk of starting Barrett and moving him out to 14/15 later in the game.<br><br>
                              I just think his effectiveness at a weapon will be reduced if he's got some miles on the clock instead of hitting the field fresh.<br>
                               </p>
                              </div>
                              </blockquote>
                              <p> </p>
                              <p> </p>
                              <p>Yeah, I know what you mean... but I think they owe it to Barrett to give him a start every now and then to push his case for that role too.</p>

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NepiaN Offline
                                NepiaN Offline
                                Nepia
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Milk" data-cid="589887" data-time="1466386065">
                                <div>
                                <p>Yeah, I know what you mean... but I think they owe it to Barrett to give him a start every now and then to push his case for that role too.</p>
                                </div>
                                </blockquote>
                                <p>I don't know if I follow that line of thinking, he gets to push his case during Super rugby like Five Sopoaga did. If he shows his wares there and convinces the coaches he's the man for the starting 10 role then he'll get some starts.</p>

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                                  Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                                  Baron Silas Greenback
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #35

                                  <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="589885" data-time="1466385707">
                                  <div>
                                  <p>bro, if we don't have assumptions that we know shit, we have nothing!</p>
                                  </div>
                                  </blockquote>
                                  <p> </p>
                                  <p> </p>
                                  <p>Speak for yourself I would still have stunning good looks and mint condition 1981 Skaterama tee.</p>

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • MN5M Online
                                    MN5M Online
                                    MN5
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #36

                                    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="589885" data-time="1466385707">
                                    <div>
                                    <p>bro, if we don't have assumptions that we know shit, <strike>we have nothing!</strike> the fern would cease to exist.....</p>
                                    </div>
                                    </blockquote>

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • boobooB Offline
                                      boobooB Offline
                                      booboo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #37

                                      <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Milk" data-cid="589887" data-time="1466386065"><p>
                                      Yeah, I know what you mean... but I think they owe it to Barrett to give him a start every now and then to push his case for that role too.</p></blockquote>
                                      <br>
                                      Really? <br><br>
                                      Firstly do the AB selectors "owe" anyone?<br>
                                      Secondly to get a similar impact off the bench they would need to put DMac at 23.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MilkM Offline
                                        MilkM Offline
                                        Milk
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #38

                                        <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="589891" data-time="1466386582">
                                        <div>
                                        <p>I don't know if I follow that line of thinking, he gets to push his case during Super rugby like Five Sopoaga did. If he shows his wares there and convinces the coaches he's the man for the starting 10 role then he'll get some starts.</p>
                                        </div>
                                        </blockquote>
                                        <p> </p>
                                        <p>If that was the case I'm not sure Kaino would have started over Dixon, Cane over Ardie, and Lima would have started by now. From what I've seen, once you've been in the environment for a while they reward All Blacks form over Super Rugby form.</p>
                                        <p> </p>
                                        <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="589941" data-time="1466397533">
                                        <div>
                                        <p>Really?<br><br>
                                        Firstly do the AB selectors "owe" anyone?<br>
                                        Secondly to get a similar impact off the bench they would need to put DMac at 23.</p>
                                        </div>
                                        </blockquote>
                                        <p> </p>
                                        <p>Yeah, what must be dozens of tests off the bench, many campaigns waiting for an opportunity and game changing impact in important games, would justify an opportunity to start for Barrett, in my opinion.</p>

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • MilkM Offline
                                          MilkM Offline
                                          Milk
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          <p>Also this:<br>
                                           </p>
                                          <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Steve Hansen">
                                          <p>"We have got a good back-up in Lima coming off the bench if we do it that way or we can go the other way and put Lima into start. <strong>Beauden probably deserves to get the opportunity</strong>."</p>
                                          </blockquote>
                                          <p> <br>
                                          <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&amp;objectid=11659418'>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&amp;objectid=11659418</a></p>
                                          <p> </p>
                                          <p>:)</p>

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search