Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.4k Posts 140 Posters 949.4k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

    @NTA ive said before, its baffling how few people from my club, players/fans etc, also watch super or international...the disconnect between all levels is real

    antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #3408

    @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

    @NTA ive said before, its baffling how few people from my club, players/fans etc, also watch super or international...the disconnect between all levels is real

    If they start winning they'll come flooding back.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • antipodeanA antipodean

      @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

      @NTA ive said before, its baffling how few people from my club, players/fans etc, also watch super or international...the disconnect between all levels is real

      If they start winning they'll come flooding back.

      KiwiwombleK Offline
      KiwiwombleK Offline
      Kiwiwomble
      wrote on last edited by
      #3409

      @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

        @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

        antipodeanA Online
        antipodeanA Online
        antipodean
        wrote on last edited by
        #3410

        @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

        @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

        I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

        The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

        KiwiwombleK mariner4lifeM D 3 Replies Last reply
        1
        • antipodeanA antipodean

          @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

          @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

          I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

          The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

          KiwiwombleK Offline
          KiwiwombleK Offline
          Kiwiwomble
          wrote on last edited by
          #3411

          @antipodean 100% agree

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • antipodeanA antipodean

            @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

            @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

            I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

            The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

            mariner4lifeM Offline
            mariner4lifeM Offline
            mariner4life
            wrote on last edited by
            #3412

            @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

            @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

            @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

            I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

            The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

            The vast majority of the rugby supporters in this country are in Sydney and Brisbane

            The Reds and the Tahs got knocked out in NZ in the first weekend of June. They won't play again for 8 months. That's an enormous issue when it comes to fan engagement.

            I think it is Super Rugby's greatest failing, it's too short. The Rugby Boards expect fans to support different teams at different times.

            In NZ it's 4 months as a Super fan. Then the ABs, and also a Province.

            In Aus it is 4 months as a Super fan. And then it is the Wallabies. But only 6 times at home.

            There just isn't enough content. 14 Super games. Finals. Then tests And it's jumbled

            Compare to an English fan, who gets 24 club games plus finals. and cups. England play in a couple of blocks during the season. It's a far better structure for fan engagement.

            KiwiwombleK B WingerW 3 Replies Last reply
            5
            • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

              @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

              @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

              @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

              I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

              The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

              The vast majority of the rugby supporters in this country are in Sydney and Brisbane

              The Reds and the Tahs got knocked out in NZ in the first weekend of June. They won't play again for 8 months. That's an enormous issue when it comes to fan engagement.

              I think it is Super Rugby's greatest failing, it's too short. The Rugby Boards expect fans to support different teams at different times.

              In NZ it's 4 months as a Super fan. Then the ABs, and also a Province.

              In Aus it is 4 months as a Super fan. And then it is the Wallabies. But only 6 times at home.

              There just isn't enough content. 14 Super games. Finals. Then tests And it's jumbled

              Compare to an English fan, who gets 24 club games plus finals. and cups. England play in a couple of blocks during the season. It's a far better structure for fan engagement.

              KiwiwombleK Offline
              KiwiwombleK Offline
              Kiwiwomble
              wrote on last edited by
              #3413

              @mariner4life thats why im convinced we need to work out how to make a "champions league" type deal work, simplify who we support back to some version of the provinces/unions, strengthen the connections better club/school and NPC/super for supporters, strengthen the "brand" of these teams so they have profile all year and so might be attractive to sponsors and for fans to get memberships

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

                @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

                @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

                I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

                The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

                The vast majority of the rugby supporters in this country are in Sydney and Brisbane

                The Reds and the Tahs got knocked out in NZ in the first weekend of June. They won't play again for 8 months. That's an enormous issue when it comes to fan engagement.

                I think it is Super Rugby's greatest failing, it's too short. The Rugby Boards expect fans to support different teams at different times.

                In NZ it's 4 months as a Super fan. Then the ABs, and also a Province.

                In Aus it is 4 months as a Super fan. And then it is the Wallabies. But only 6 times at home.

                There just isn't enough content. 14 Super games. Finals. Then tests And it's jumbled

                Compare to an English fan, who gets 24 club games plus finals. and cups. England play in a couple of blocks during the season. It's a far better structure for fan engagement.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                bayimports
                wrote on last edited by
                #3414

                @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby:

                @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

                @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

                @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

                I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

                The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

                The vast majority of the rugby supporters in this country are in Sydney and Brisbane

                The Reds and the Tahs got knocked out in NZ in the first weekend of June. They won't play again for 8 months. That's an enormous issue when it comes to fan engagement.

                I think it is Super Rugby's greatest failing, it's too short. The Rugby Boards expect fans to support different teams at different times.

                In NZ it's 4 months as a Super fan. Then the ABs, and also a Province.

                In Aus it is 4 months as a Super fan. And then it is the Wallabies. But only 6 times at home.

                There just isn't enough content. 14 Super games. Finals. Then tests And it's jumbled

                Compare to an English fan, who gets 24 club games plus finals. and cups. England play in a couple of blocks during the season. It's a far better structure for fan engagement.

                although probably not a popular statement I think the governance on refereeing is also a problem. Sure we have an attractive game at provincial and Super level, but it is so different to how NH refs look at test rugby, it does ourselves a complete disservice at test level. More games, consistent approach to refereeing, maybe consistency at a higher level isn't so hard for Aus and NZ even if we are not playing bok teams regularly (which I miss too).

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • StargazerS Offline
                  StargazerS Offline
                  Stargazer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #3415

                  https://twitter.com/WallaroosRugby/status/1567309297284964359

                  https://wallaroos.rugby/news/wallaroos-confirm-rugby-world-cup-squad-202296

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NTAN NTA

                    @Machpants said in Aussie Rugby:

                    So not great in todays quick gratification society

                    Thinking on this further: the number of rugby fans here who pooh-pooh AFL and League as sports are missing the point.

                    What can we learn from them? It is pretty fucking clear we need a national competition but there are so many political forces holding that back.

                    Premier Rugby in Sydney is one of the major obstacles to itself and the broader game.
                    Schools Rugby in NSW is a disjointed, disruptive scourge that basically destroys the continuity of participation here.

                    How do you address that when they are powers unto themselves?

                    There was that article on the new boss of Sky talking about fan engagement outside the playing field. Rugby completely and utterly lacks anything like that here.

                    Club finals are done in Sydney for Premier Rugby. Suburban Rugby finishes on 17/09. Once that happens, Sydney is a rugby-free zone. There will be Bledisloe Tests and that's it.

                    That worked back in the day where everyone played cricket in the summer and we all clicked the channel changer over to Channel Nine for a bit of Richie and the crew. Now we need a global, year-round game where things take a break for a few weeks at Christmas before launching into January pre-season excitement.

                    I despair.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    pakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #3416

                    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                    @Machpants said in Aussie Rugby:

                    So not great in todays quick gratification society

                    Thinking on this further: the number of rugby fans here who pooh-pooh AFL and League as sports are missing the point.

                    What can we learn from them? It is pretty fucking clear we need a national competition but there are so many political forces holding that back.

                    Premier Rugby in Sydney is one of the major obstacles to itself and the broader game.
                    Schools Rugby in NSW is a disjointed, disruptive scourge that basically destroys the continuity of participation here.

                    How do you address that when they are powers unto themselves?

                    There was that article on the new boss of Sky talking about fan engagement outside the playing field. Rugby completely and utterly lacks anything like that here.

                    Club finals are done in Sydney for Premier Rugby. Suburban Rugby finishes on 17/09. Once that happens, Sydney is a rugby-free zone. There will be Bledisloe Tests and that's it.

                    That worked back in the day where everyone played cricket in the summer and we all clicked the channel changer over to Channel Nine for a bit of Richie and the crew. Now we need a global, year-round game where things take a break for a few weeks at Christmas before launching into January pre-season excitement.

                    I despair.

                    https://www.theroar.com.au/2022/09/09/rugby-australia-must-follow-the-afls-lead-to-rejuvenate-the-sport-and-bring-in-the-money/

                    WingerW NTAN KiwiwombleK 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

                      @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

                      I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

                      The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Derpus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #3417

                      @antipodean pretty sure you mercilessly derided me for suggesting we should have our own comp with, you know, more teams...

                      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Derpus

                        @antipodean pretty sure you mercilessly derided me for suggesting we should have our own comp with, you know, more teams...

                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodeanA Online
                        antipodean
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #3418

                        @Derpus said in Aussie Rugby:

                        @antipodean pretty sure you mercilessly derided me for suggesting we should have our own comp with, you know, more teams...

                        Pretty sure none of what you mentioned was discussed in the post you just responded to.

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • antipodeanA antipodean

                          @Derpus said in Aussie Rugby:

                          @antipodean pretty sure you mercilessly derided me for suggesting we should have our own comp with, you know, more teams...

                          Pretty sure none of what you mentioned was discussed in the post you just responded to.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Derpus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #3419

                          @antipodean 'not enough games or tribalism' - sorry I needed to explicitly connect the dots for you.

                          antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                            @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:

                            @Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:

                            @antipodean probably true, thats what we need to bottle though, the passion we see in AFL and europen football where people still rock up and pay to watch their team lose...and then complain about everyone and everything...and then turn up and pay the next week...AND but a new piece of merch

                            I agree and can't help but feel the problem is the creation of these Super Rugby franchises. Not enough games and very little tribalism, so if your team sucks, what exists to keep you engaged and motivated?

                            The other problem is in Brisbane and Sydney there's other things to do. In Melbourne you can sit in a cafe until the weather improves..?

                            The vast majority of the rugby supporters in this country are in Sydney and Brisbane

                            The Reds and the Tahs got knocked out in NZ in the first weekend of June. They won't play again for 8 months. That's an enormous issue when it comes to fan engagement.

                            I think it is Super Rugby's greatest failing, it's too short. The Rugby Boards expect fans to support different teams at different times.

                            In NZ it's 4 months as a Super fan. Then the ABs, and also a Province.

                            In Aus it is 4 months as a Super fan. And then it is the Wallabies. But only 6 times at home.

                            There just isn't enough content. 14 Super games. Finals. Then tests And it's jumbled

                            Compare to an English fan, who gets 24 club games plus finals. and cups. England play in a couple of blocks during the season. It's a far better structure for fan engagement.

                            WingerW Offline
                            WingerW Offline
                            Winger
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #3420
                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P pakman

                              @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                              @Machpants said in Aussie Rugby:

                              So not great in todays quick gratification society

                              Thinking on this further: the number of rugby fans here who pooh-pooh AFL and League as sports are missing the point.

                              What can we learn from them? It is pretty fucking clear we need a national competition but there are so many political forces holding that back.

                              Premier Rugby in Sydney is one of the major obstacles to itself and the broader game.
                              Schools Rugby in NSW is a disjointed, disruptive scourge that basically destroys the continuity of participation here.

                              How do you address that when they are powers unto themselves?

                              There was that article on the new boss of Sky talking about fan engagement outside the playing field. Rugby completely and utterly lacks anything like that here.

                              Club finals are done in Sydney for Premier Rugby. Suburban Rugby finishes on 17/09. Once that happens, Sydney is a rugby-free zone. There will be Bledisloe Tests and that's it.

                              That worked back in the day where everyone played cricket in the summer and we all clicked the channel changer over to Channel Nine for a bit of Richie and the crew. Now we need a global, year-round game where things take a break for a few weeks at Christmas before launching into January pre-season excitement.

                              I despair.

                              https://www.theroar.com.au/2022/09/09/rugby-australia-must-follow-the-afls-lead-to-rejuvenate-the-sport-and-bring-in-the-money/

                              WingerW Offline
                              WingerW Offline
                              Winger
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #3421

                              @pakman 4.5 billion over 7 years. Vs 100 million over 3 years. I guess it shows the potential for rugby but shows how poorly rugby has done. Super rugby was brilliant when it first kicked off but is disappointing now. Unsure what can be done.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • D Derpus

                                @antipodean 'not enough games or tribalism' - sorry I needed to explicitly connect the dots for you.

                                antipodeanA Online
                                antipodeanA Online
                                antipodean
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #3422

                                @Derpus said in Aussie Rugby:

                                @antipodean 'not enough games or tribalism' - sorry I needed to explicitly connect the dots for you.

                                Try not connecting to the imaginary dot where I advocated for additional SR teams.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P pakman

                                  @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                  @Machpants said in Aussie Rugby:

                                  So not great in todays quick gratification society

                                  Thinking on this further: the number of rugby fans here who pooh-pooh AFL and League as sports are missing the point.

                                  What can we learn from them? It is pretty fucking clear we need a national competition but there are so many political forces holding that back.

                                  Premier Rugby in Sydney is one of the major obstacles to itself and the broader game.
                                  Schools Rugby in NSW is a disjointed, disruptive scourge that basically destroys the continuity of participation here.

                                  How do you address that when they are powers unto themselves?

                                  There was that article on the new boss of Sky talking about fan engagement outside the playing field. Rugby completely and utterly lacks anything like that here.

                                  Club finals are done in Sydney for Premier Rugby. Suburban Rugby finishes on 17/09. Once that happens, Sydney is a rugby-free zone. There will be Bledisloe Tests and that's it.

                                  That worked back in the day where everyone played cricket in the summer and we all clicked the channel changer over to Channel Nine for a bit of Richie and the crew. Now we need a global, year-round game where things take a break for a few weeks at Christmas before launching into January pre-season excitement.

                                  I despair.

                                  https://www.theroar.com.au/2022/09/09/rugby-australia-must-follow-the-afls-lead-to-rejuvenate-the-sport-and-bring-in-the-money/

                                  NTAN Offline
                                  NTAN Offline
                                  NTA
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #3423

                                  @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                  I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                  I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                  So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                  After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • NTAN NTA

                                    @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                    I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                    I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                    So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                    After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    pakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #3424

                                    @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                    @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                    I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                    I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                    So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                    After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                    Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • P pakman

                                      @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                      @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                      I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                      I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                      So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                      After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                      Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTAN Offline
                                      NTA
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #3425

                                      @pakman said in Aussie Rugby:

                                      @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                      @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                      I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                      I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                      So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                      After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                      Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                      Sure but that money is spent, and they're offering much more content than Rugby can, with an established product

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • NTAN NTA

                                        @pakman said in Aussie Rugby:

                                        @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                        @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                        I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                        I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                        So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                        After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                        Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                        Sure but that money is spent, and they're offering much more content than Rugby can, with an established product

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        pakman
                                        wrote on last edited by pakman
                                        #3426

                                        @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                        @pakman said in Aussie Rugby:

                                        @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                        @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                        I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                        I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                        So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                        After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                        Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                        Sure but that money is spent, and they're offering much more content than Rugby can, with an established product

                                        If I were Oz Rugby I’d ask myself what could be copied and see the next AFL renewal as its deadline to aim improvements at.

                                        antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • P pakman

                                          @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @pakman said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                          I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                          I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                          So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                          After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                          Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                          Sure but that money is spent, and they're offering much more content than Rugby can, with an established product

                                          If I were Oz Rugby I’d ask myself what could be copied and see the next AFL renewal as its deadline to aim improvements at.

                                          antipodeanA Online
                                          antipodeanA Online
                                          antipodean
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #3427

                                          @pakman said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @pakman said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @NTA said in Aussie Rugby:

                                          @pakman ah yes - another article from The Roar stating what needs to happen with the barest skerrick of detail except "teh domestic game".

                                          I'm not really sure how they plan to do anything about expanding franchises without getting more money first. RWC2003 funds were used for the ARC which everyone in Sydney fought tooth and nail. And it happened again with the NRC - how convenient was COVID for Sydney Premier Rugby who didn't want to even get to the starting line?

                                          I've railed against the idea of Sydney Uni, Randwick, Eastwood, etc. getting a seat at the table of a national competition, but about 2 years ago I came around to the realisation that it won't happen until they've tried and/or failed.

                                          So find a platform, set the criteria, and let clubs/franchises apply if they've got the skin for it.

                                          After all, it's not like Sydney "Premier" Rugby isn't already a haves/nots system.

                                          Agreed. But the 'fact' that AFL could raise that much does indicates the bucks are there if the right balance could be struck.

                                          Sure but that money is spent, and they're offering much more content than Rugby can, with an established product

                                          If I were Oz Rugby I’d ask myself what could be copied and see the next AFL renewal as its deadline to aim improvements at.

                                          Perhaps RA could review their last SWOT analysis...

                                          NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search