Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks XV 2022

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacksxv
840 Posts 67 Posters 57.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #558

    i think this selection puts to bed the myth that Scott Robinson is some sort of coaching savant

    when you have more than half of the best players in the country, so many they can't even all get in the 23, then i expect you to win and win well.

    CrucialC taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    7
    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

      i think this selection puts to bed the myth that Scott Robinson is some sort of coaching savant

      when you have more than half of the best players in the country, so many they can't even all get in the 23, then i expect you to win and win well.

      CrucialC Offline
      CrucialC Offline
      Crucial
      wrote on last edited by
      #559

      @mariner4life said in All Blacks XV:

      i think this selection puts to bed the myth that Scott Robinson is some sort of coaching savant

      when you have more than half of the best players in the country, so many they can't even all get in the 23, then i expect you to win and win well.

      Aah! But he must have made them so good surely? Oh, that was Ryan?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

        i think this selection puts to bed the myth that Scott Robinson is some sort of coaching savant

        when you have more than half of the best players in the country, so many they can't even all get in the 23, then i expect you to win and win well.

        taniwharugbyT Offline
        taniwharugbyT Offline
        taniwharugby
        wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
        #560

        @mariner4life said in All Blacks XV:

        i think this selection puts to bed the myth that Scott Robinson is some sort of coaching savant

        I think it says the opposite and Fozzie is drinking the Razor is god coolade and anyone in the Crusader squad must be good, who knows it may turn out correct, although some players may respond better to different coaches too

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

          @Frye i guess i dont buy into the whole tin foil hat ness of just having your names associated with the crusaders...thought its was more a case of you're viewed more favorably playing in a winning team when players playing better for a loosing team get overlooked

          F Offline
          F Offline
          Frye
          wrote on last edited by
          #561

          @Kiwiwomble Yeah I understand what you're saying and mostly agree.

          But I do think that Ryan has a relationship with all of these guys, and that could well be influencing his decisions. And I agree with @Crucial that it's bad optics. If there's a 50/50 decision maybe then don't go with another Canterbury/Crusader?

          Anyway here's Brayden Iose running over... hmm can't make that player out? Otago number 8 🤔

          KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • F Frye

            @Kiwiwomble Yeah I understand what you're saying and mostly agree.

            But I do think that Ryan has a relationship with all of these guys, and that could well be influencing his decisions. And I agree with @Crucial that it's bad optics. If there's a 50/50 decision maybe then don't go with another Canterbury/Crusader?

            Anyway here's Brayden Iose running over... hmm can't make that player out? Otago number 8 🤔

            KiwiwombleK Offline
            KiwiwombleK Offline
            Kiwiwomble
            wrote on last edited by
            #562

            @Frye yeah, thats all fair for guys playing for the crusaders and still not shining

            and come on, thats one tackle and not even from this year

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • A ARHS

              When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

              GrooterG Offline
              GrooterG Offline
              Grooter
              wrote on last edited by Grooter
              #563

              @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

              When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

              a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

              KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • GrooterG Grooter

                @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

                When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

                a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

                KirwanK Offline
                KirwanK Offline
                Kirwan
                wrote on last edited by
                #564

                @FakatavaAllBlack said in All Blacks XV:

                @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

                When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

                a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

                Luckily Schmidt looks to have protected the back selections from this sort of ridiculous provincialism.

                Thought Ryan was better than this.

                ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • KirwanK Kirwan

                  @FakatavaAllBlack said in All Blacks XV:

                  @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

                  When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

                  a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

                  Luckily Schmidt looks to have protected the back selections from this sort of ridiculous provincialism.

                  Thought Ryan was better than this.

                  ChrisC Offline
                  ChrisC Offline
                  Chris
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #565

                  @Kirwan said in All Blacks XV:

                  @FakatavaAllBlack said in All Blacks XV:

                  @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

                  When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

                  a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

                  Luckily Schmidt looks to have protected the back selections from this sort of ridiculous provincialism.

                  Thought Ryan was better than this.

                  Where is Foster in these selections then,
                  Surly Ryan does not get 100% total say in forwards selections , So Foster and Schmidt must have some say there are 3 selectors,
                  If the answer is no then Ryan is the true HC because he has total control.
                  I would think the other 2 selectors must have agreed they wanted these players selected.
                  McDonald also sat in on the selections and had some input which was reported when he was named as coach.

                  ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ChrisC Chris

                    @Kirwan said in All Blacks XV:

                    @FakatavaAllBlack said in All Blacks XV:

                    @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

                    When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

                    a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

                    Luckily Schmidt looks to have protected the back selections from this sort of ridiculous provincialism.

                    Thought Ryan was better than this.

                    Where is Foster in these selections then,
                    Surly Ryan does not get 100% total say in forwards selections , So Foster and Schmidt must have some say there are 3 selectors,
                    If the answer is no then Ryan is the true HC because he has total control.
                    I would think the other 2 selectors must have agreed they wanted these players selected.
                    McDonald also sat in on the selections and had some input which was reported when he was named as coach.

                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                    ACT Crusader
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #566

                    @Chris said in All Blacks XV:

                    @Kirwan said in All Blacks XV:

                    @FakatavaAllBlack said in All Blacks XV:

                    @ARHS said in All Blacks XV:

                    When I first saw team I thought it was a photos hop by a Crusaders fans and kept looking for A.N. Other non Crusader. There are about the 9 or 10 there I would not have expected in next best squad but maybe injuries account for a few of those. TUJ Moorby Stevenson McWhannell Eklund Norris Hodgman Z Sullivan Nareki Sowakula Robinson all unlucky in my view.

                    a real crusaders fan would've snuck Bridge in🙂

                    Luckily Schmidt looks to have protected the back selections from this sort of ridiculous provincialism.

                    Thought Ryan was better than this.

                    Where is Foster in these selections then,
                    Surly Ryan does not get 100% total say in forwards selections , So Foster and Schmidt must have some say there are 3 selectors,
                    If the answer is no then Ryan is the true HC because he has total control.
                    I would think the other 2 selectors must have agreed they wanted these players selected.
                    McDonald also sat in on the selections and had some input which was reported when he was named as coach.

                    That explains the blatant franchise selection that was Bryce Heem…

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • M Machpants

                      @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                      @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                      @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                      @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                      He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                      MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                      Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                      antipodeanA Offline
                      antipodeanA Offline
                      antipodean
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #567

                      @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                      @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                      @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                      @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                      @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                      He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                      MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                      Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                      It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                      https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                      BonesB M 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                        @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                        @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                        @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                        @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                        He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                        MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                        Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                        It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                        https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                        BonesB Offline
                        BonesB Offline
                        Bones
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #568

                        @antipodean oh that's delicious.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • antipodeanA antipodean

                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                          @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                          He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                          MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                          Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                          It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                          https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by Machpants
                          #569

                          @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                          @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                          @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                          He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                          MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                          Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                          It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                          https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                          So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                          MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                          BonesB TheMojomanT 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • M Machpants

                            @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                            @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                            He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                            MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                            Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                            It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                            https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                            So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                            MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                            BonesB Offline
                            BonesB Offline
                            Bones
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #570

                            @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                            @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                            @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                            @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                            He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                            MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                            Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                            It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                            https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                            So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                            MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                            I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • BonesB Bones

                              @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                              @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                              @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                              He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                              MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                              Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                              It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                              https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                              So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                              MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                              I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Machpants
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #571

                              @Bones said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                              @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                              @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                              @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                              He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                              MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                              Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                              It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                              https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                              So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                              MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                              I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                              Yeah NZR can still say that's the Junior ABs I guess

                              ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • M Machpants

                                @Bones said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                                He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                                MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                                Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                                It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                                https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                                So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                                MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                                I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                                Yeah NZR can still say that's the Junior ABs I guess

                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT Crusader
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #572

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Bones said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                                @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                                He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                                MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                                Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                                It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                                https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                                So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                                MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                                I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                                Yeah NZR can still say that's the Junior ABs I guess

                                Whilst in theory they could say that, I’m pretty sure that JABs was abandoned in 2009 so there is no such team. So I guess it comes down to technicality.

                                BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Bones said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                                  He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                                  MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                                  Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                                  It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                                  https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                                  So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                                  MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                                  I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                                  Yeah NZR can still say that's the Junior ABs I guess

                                  Whilst in theory they could say that, I’m pretty sure that JABs was abandoned in 2009 so there is no such team. So I guess it comes down to technicality.

                                  BonesB Offline
                                  BonesB Offline
                                  Bones
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #573

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Bones said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                                  @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                                  He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                                  MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                                  Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                                  It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                                  https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                                  So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                                  MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                                  I think that's the key though - "the next senior representative side" wasn't that the wording? So it's simple, ABXV isn't the next senior representative side....yet.

                                  Yeah NZR can still say that's the Junior ABs I guess

                                  Whilst in theory they could say that, I’m pretty sure that JABs was abandoned in 2009 so there is no such team. So I guess it comes down to technicality.

                                  There's a whole lot more to Regulation 8 than just the snippet in that tweet. A quick squiz doesn't bring anything to light regarding the official "next senior representative side", other than to say the unions have to do some declaration thing regarding the players on 1st December....and then I fell asleep.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                    @Frye Yeah - even as a Crusaders' supporter, the optics look a bit wrong.

                                    About the only rationale you can apply to the Hodgman non-selection, is they've picked de Groot, Bower and Ofa for the ABs. They've got Ross more highly rated, Moody to return - so in the here and now, Alex is (at best) their No. 6 loosehead and they're unlikely to need to turn to him next year, so they're investing in the future with Williams and Brewis. Still pretty unlucky I think.

                                    They've got 6 midfielders (including Jordie) in the AB squad + Goodhue and Tupaea injured, so the best of the AB XV midfielders is presumably 9th in line. Heem might be 12th.

                                    Bell has been getting rave reviews as the way of the future, so I don't mind him over Thompson (who is still a bit unlucky) - it's just all the other Crusaders being there, makes it seem a bit off.

                                    I haven't watched much of Canterbury inb this year's NPC, but I wasn't hugely impressed with Gardiner in Super. I'm not sure I've ever seen Lio-Willie play - I guess Ryan thought it was a coup pinching him off the Highlanders.

                                    ChrisC Offline
                                    ChrisC Offline
                                    Chris
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #574

                                    @Chris-B said in All Blacks XV:

                                    @Frye Yeah - even as a Crusaders' supporter, the optics look a bit wrong.

                                    About the only rationale you can apply to the Hodgman non-selection, is they've picked de Groot, Bower and Ofa for the ABs. They've got Ross more highly rated, Moody to return - so in the here and now, Alex is (at best) their No. 6 loosehead and they're unlikely to need to turn to him next year, so they're investing in the future with Williams and Brewis. Still pretty unlucky I think.

                                    They've got 6 midfielders (including Jordie) in the AB squad + Goodhue and Tupaea injured, so the best of the AB XV midfielders is presumably 9th in line. Heem might be 12th.

                                    Bell has been getting rave reviews as the way of the future, so I don't mind him over Thompson (who is still a bit unlucky) - it's just all the other Crusaders being there, makes it seem a bit off.

                                    I haven't watched much of Canterbury inb this year's NPC, but I wasn't hugely impressed with Gardiner in Super. I'm not sure I've ever seen Lio-Willie play - I guess Ryan thought it was a coup pinching him off the Highlanders.

                                    Gardiner has been the outstanding forward for Canterbury in the NPC one of the standout forward in the NPC.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WingerW Winger

                                      Including the province

                                      8 forwards from Canterbury (out of 16). No backs. Is this the influence of a new AB coach maybe

                                      All Blacks XV squad: Forwards: Asafo Aumua (Wellington), George Bell (Canterbury), Brodie McAlister (Canty), Finlay Brewis (Canty), Oli Jager (Canty), Aidan Ross (Bay of Plenty), Angus Ta’avao (Auckland), Tamaiti Williams (Canty), Josh Dickson (Otago), Zach Gallagher (Canty), Patrick Tuipulotu (Auckland – captain), Dominic Gardiner (Canty), Billy Harmon (Canty), Luke Jacobson (Waikato), Christian Lio-Willie (Otago), Marino Mikaele-Tu'u (Hawkes Bay).

                                      Backs: TJ Perenara (Wellington), Brad Weber (Hawke’s Bay), Cam Roigard (Counties Manukau), Bryn Gatland (North Harbour), Damian McKenzie (Waikato), Levi Aumua ( Ta$man), Bryce Heem (Auckland), Alex Nankivell ( Ta$man), Bailyn Sullivan (Waikato), AJ Lam (Auckland), Ruben Love (Wellington), Mark Telea (North Harbour).

                                      ChrisC Offline
                                      ChrisC Offline
                                      Chris
                                      wrote on last edited by Chris
                                      #575
                                      This post is deleted!
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ChrisC Offline
                                        ChrisC Offline
                                        Chris
                                        wrote on last edited by Chris
                                        #576

                                        @Nepia
                                        On your question about how long Jager has been in NZ.
                                        9 years,He came to Canterbury in 2013 attended the Crusaders Academy and never left.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Machpants

                                          @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                                          He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                                          MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                                          Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                                          It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                                          https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                                          So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                                          MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                                          TheMojomanT Offline
                                          TheMojomanT Offline
                                          TheMojoman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #577

                                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @antipodean said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Dan54 said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Machpants said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @SBW1 said in All Blacks XV:

                                          @Tim Levi Aumua named, that means he is locked in to represent the Abs at some stage, thought he wouldn't be considered due to playing for MP. Glad he has been chosen, he is a big power centre.

                                          He can't be called up into ABs, but this is a non capture team so no problem.

                                          MP isn't a capture team either, so playing for either team is no problem.

                                          Correct, but also wrong. NZR has signed an agreement with the PI Unions, as part of the set up of MP, to not pick NZ eligible players from MP for the ABs (I guess Mcclutchie would be an exception as he's not Island qualified). Otherwise it would be a sixth NZ franchise. For ABs purposes, MP is an overseas team. But it apparently that doesn't apply to non capture teams like the XV

                                          It seems to be a common misconception, e.g.
                                          https://mobile.twitter.com/kendrick_lemafs/status/1579595455868305408

                                          So the rules have changed? It used to be you had to declare a team your second team EDIT That appears to be U20 only.

                                          MP says nah that's not right, NZR still need to declare it. So we'll see

                                          NZR confirmed later in the tweet thread ie, this is not a capture team.

                                          Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search