T20 World Cup - Other Matches
-
Laws of cricket (https://www.lords.org/mcc/the-laws-of-cricket/no-ball) state:
21.16 Runs resulting from a No ball – how scored
The one run penalty shall be scored as a No ball extra and shall be debited against the bowler. If other Penalty runs have been awarded to either side these shall be scored as stated in Law 41.18 (Penalty runs). Any runs completed by the batters or any boundary allowance shall be credited to the striker if the ball has been struck by the bat; otherwise they shall also be scored as Byes or Leg byes as appropriate.
21.17 No ball not to count
A No ball shall not count as one of the over. See Law 17.3 (Validity of balls).
21.18 Out from a No ball
When No ball has been called, neither batters shall be out under any of the Laws except 34 (Hit the ball twice), 37 (Obstructing the field) or 38 (Run out).
@Bones decided to look it up before telling @voodoo my truth that of course the runs count.
Laws aren't explicit but read as if you play on as if nothing happened, and of course you get the runs. Which is what I've always understood/accepted/knew.
As the Free Hit is the extension of the No Ball, same rules apply. Run till you're run out.
-
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
Laws of cricket (https://www.lords.org/mcc/the-laws-of-cricket/no-ball) state:
21.16 Runs resulting from a No ball – how scored
The one run penalty shall be scored as a No ball extra and shall be debited against the bowler. If other Penalty runs have been awarded to either side these shall be scored as stated in Law 41.18 (Penalty runs). Any runs completed by the batters or any boundary allowance shall be credited to the striker if the ball has been struck by the bat; otherwise they shall also be scored as Byes or Leg byes as appropriate.
21.17 No ball not to count
A No ball shall not count as one of the over. See Law 17.3 (Validity of balls).
21.18 Out from a No ball
When No ball has been called, neither batters shall be out under any of the Laws except 34 (Hit the ball twice), 37 (Obstructing the field) or 38 (Run out).
@Bones decided to look it up before telling @voodoo my truth that of course the runs count.
Laws aren't explicit but read as if you play on as if nothing happened, and of course you get the runs. Which is what I've always understood/accepted/knew.
As the Free Hit is the extension of the No Ball, same rules apply. Run till you're run out.
I didn't know this. So if the bowler oversteps, the batman hits it and gets caught, the batsman is not out, gets the runs complete anyway , and there is an extra ball? So if you're fielding, and you take that catch, you actually have to send through throw in to effect a run out to stop the flow?
That makes sense....
-
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
-
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
-
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
-
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
Ok bro. Byes off being bowled out on a free hit makes heaps sense, stick to netball fella
No rules ever need challenging.
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
Ok bro. Byes off being bowled out on a free hit makes heaps sense, stick to netball fella
No rules ever need challenging.
It's a fucking free hit. Get the fuck over yourself.
-
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
Ok bro. Byes off being bowled out on a free hit makes heaps sense, stick to netball fella
No rules ever need challenging.
It's a fucking free hit. Get the fuck over yourself.
So angry. Hope you're OK mate
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
Ok bro. Byes off being bowled out on a free hit makes heaps sense, stick to netball fella
No rules ever need challenging.
It's a fucking free hit. Get the fuck over yourself.
So angry. Hope you're OK mate
Byes off a free hit make perfect sense, good deterrent for the bowler eh!
Stick to basketball fella
Or carry on your crusade of calling everything/everyone dumb or stupid just because you don't like how a rule works.
-
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
Ok bro. Byes off being bowled out on a free hit makes heaps sense, stick to netball fella
No rules ever need challenging.
It's a fucking free hit. Get the fuck over yourself.
So angry. Hope you're OK mate
Byes off a free hit make perfect sense, good deterrent for the bowler eh!
Stick to basketball fella
Or carry on your crusade of calling everything/everyone dumb or stupid just because you don't like how a rule works.
Byes on a free hit sure. Byes on a free hit after you get bowled, nope. Is your "bowler deterrent" to not bowl straight and hit the stumps for fear of a ricochet???
You're typically a sensible guy, it staggers me that you can't see the logic here
-
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@booboo said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo said in T20 World Cup:
@ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup:
@voodoo I don’t mind it because there are established methods of getting out on a no ball.
What I saw last night in that ball was akin to an attempted run out when the fielder throws the ball hits the stumps but the batsman makes the crease but the ball ricochet’s off the stumps and goes to the outfield and the batsmen run more runs.
First principle, you can’t be bowled out on free hit ball, so don’t bowl something like that ball because you can’t set a field for it
Nah, there is a fundamental difference there. In your example the batsman wasn't out because he was safe in his crease. In the alternative, he was out, and only given a lifeline because of the free hit principle.
I cant get my head around being out on a free hit, and not only keeping your wicket (fine) but also capitalising with runs on some random event after you were "out "
Without trying to sound smart arse the clue is in the name.
But to me the "free hit" means you're not going to get out. It doesn't mean that if you do "get out", you also get to score runs off your wicket!!!
Sorry. Thems the rules.
I know it's the bloody rules!!! But the rules are stupid!!!
The rules are fine, clearly understood and fit the purpose they're there for.
Ok bro. Byes off being bowled out on a free hit makes heaps sense, stick to netball fella
No rules ever need challenging.
It's a fucking free hit. Get the fuck over yourself.
So angry. Hope you're OK mate
Byes off a free hit make perfect sense, good deterrent for the bowler eh!
Stick to basketball fella
Or carry on your crusade of calling everything/everyone dumb or stupid just because you don't like how a rule works.
Byes on a free hit sure. Byes on a free hit after you get bowled, nope. Is your "bowler deterrent" to not bowl straight and hit the stumps for fear of a ricochet???
You're typically a sensible guy, it staggers me that you can't see the logic here
Don't bowl a no ball, the logic makes complete sense to most people.
-
I think I'm with @voodoo on this one.
A free hit should be....- You can't get out (from bowled/caught/stumping)
- But... if you DO get bowled/caught/stumping - no runs
- If you're taking the piss taking runs that aren't there - run-outs still apply
Simples? Surely?
-
By the logic applied in this case the ball is never dead until back in the bowler’s or keepers hands.
Does that mean that if caught you can continue running until the ball is thrown back?
I guess it does as I think I have seen that before. If you catch it you throw it back immediately. -
-
@Bones said in T20 World Cup:
@Kruse said in T20 World Cup:
If you're taking the piss taking runs that aren't there - run-outs still apply
They do.
Yes. Understood... just rounding out how I believe the rules/laws should be.. including the ones that already exist.
