• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

T20 World Cup NZ v PAK

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
362 Posts 28 Posters 14.2k Views
T20 World Cup NZ v PAK
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to MajorPom on last edited by
    #105

    @MajorRage said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Oooo that's not good. Need a big one from somebody.

    Where have all these Pakistan fans come from?

    There's a big Pakistani community out in Bankstown, Lakemba and that southwestern part of Sydney. Wouldn't be surprised if a few travelled from Melbourne where there's a decent sized community too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #106

    10s get us to 160 which is defendable, 170+ would be ideal though

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #107

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @No-Quarter said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Not sure what they are reviewing for, hoping he hit it I guess

    I've always thought you should have to declare what you're reviewing for. If its LBW and it turns out that he hit it, then any catch isn't relevant.

    Ummm, out is out!

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #108

    Loves Mitch Jr

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #109

    Full toss outside leg, come on Kane....

    Mitch goes bang

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #110

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @No-Quarter said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Not sure what they are reviewing for, hoping he hit it I guess

    I've always thought you should have to declare what you're reviewing for. If its LBW and it turns out that he hit it, then any catch isn't relevant.

    Ummm, out is out!

    No freebie! If you appeal for LBW, you're saying he didn't hit it. If it turns out he did, you shouldn't be out caught!

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #111

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Full toss outside leg, come on Kane....

    Mitch goes bang

    His straight hit is glorious

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #112

    160 defs on from here. I’ll defs back our bowlers to defend that.

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #113

    Jeez the fielding has been good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #114

    Don't cut your fingernails boys, it's reversing!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #115

    @Canes4life said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    160 defs on from here. I’ll defs back our bowlers to defend that.

    I admire your optimism

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    We need a big over or two

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4lifeC Online
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #117

    This next over needs to be a goody. Then we can break the shackles and go for it with four overs to go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #118

    sheeshhhhhhh lucky as

    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #119

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    sheeshhhhhhh lucky as

    x2...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #120

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @No-Quarter said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Not sure what they are reviewing for, hoping he hit it I guess

    I've always thought you should have to declare what you're reviewing for. If its LBW and it turns out that he hit it, then any catch isn't relevant.

    Ummm, out is out!

    No freebie! If you appeal for LBW, you're saying he didn't hit it. If it turns out he did, you shouldn't be out caught!

    Nah. Disagree.

    Team appeals for a wicket. There's no obligation to specify what for.

    Plenty of times a team will appeal for LBW, with the only thing saving the batsman is a possible inside edge. If caught, both should be reviewed.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    Pakistan starting to make the odd mistake in the field...

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #122

    @canefan said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Pakistan starting to make the odd mistake in the field...

    We are starting to find the gaps and be more aggressive too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #123

    @Damo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @No-Quarter said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Not sure what they are reviewing for, hoping he hit it I guess

    I've always thought you should have to declare what you're reviewing for. If its LBW and it turns out that he hit it, then any catch isn't relevant.

    Ummm, out is out!

    No freebie! If you appeal for LBW, you're saying he didn't hit it. If it turns out he did, you shouldn't be out caught!

    Nah. Disagree.

    Team appeals for a wicket. There's no obligation to specify what for.

    Plenty of times a team will appeal for LBW, with the only thing saving the batsman is a possible inside edge. If caught, both should be reviewed.

    I get the rule! But I don't like a free hit. What did you appeal for? A catch or an LBW? Decide please. And if you want to review and challenge the umpires decision, you should be doubly sure!

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Time for full speed ahead now. Let's see how many we can get.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

T20 World Cup NZ v PAK
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.