• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

T20 World Cup NZ v PAK

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
362 Posts 28 Posters 14.2k Views
T20 World Cup NZ v PAK
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #172

    @KiwiMurph said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Why not a wide when it was far enough away from the stumps?

    Because the batsman moved his spot to outside off

    That only matters if it is close to the stumps. That one wasn't

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #173

    @Damo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Probably not enough. We need to bowl well. We certainly can defend this with a bit of luck. Hopefully it swings for an extended period.

    Gonna need to bowl awesome and every catch is going to have to stick

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #174

    Happy enough, I think that's defendable.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #175

    About 15 runs short of where we needed to be. Gonna need early wickets.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by bayimports
    #176

    @Canes4life said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    That was really pathetic. 6 wickets in hand. What a fucking joke.

    I think it’s a lot harder than it looks out there. We won’t know until we bowl I guess.

    agree, I dont think it is that easy to bat out there either..plus Pakistan bowling and fielding was impressive

    we can do the same, just need to execute

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #177

    Pakistan did very well.

    Lost the toss and restricted us to under 155.

    Got Allen and Phillips cheaply.

    Brilliant fielding.

    Now let's see the second innings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #178

    @Bones said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Happy enough, I think that's defendable.

    I agree. Tight bowling in the powerplay.

    I wouldn't bowl Ferg in the powerplay overs

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    their top order has not been great, hopefully we get some swing and some Boult magic to start

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #180

    @ACT-Crusader said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @Bones said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Happy enough, I think that's defendable.

    I agree. Tight bowling in the powerplay.

    I wouldn't bowl Ferg in the powerplay overs

    I assume we have Sodhi in the team as well as Santner? Might as well not watch the 2nd half, we've as good as won. Daryl can roll a few over too if he wants.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #181

    Second innings Black Caps game plan:

    • Reverse jinxes required at regular intervals
    • Send @booboo to bed if Pakistan get off to a fast start
    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    What's with this pitch? Did they ship it over from Lahore?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #183

    152/4 right? Not much of a challenge

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #184

    @akan004 said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    Expected more from Neesham. Feel we are 15 short.

    I'm not sure whether we are 15 short. 7.5+rpo needed and some of their batters are under pressure. We were always going to have to bowl well against these guys because of how they bowl.

    Agree that Neesh was pretty ineffective. Probably would've got more out SatNav

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #185

    @Machpants said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    152/4 right? Not much of a challenge

    They are gonna piss in

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #186

    @Canes4life said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    That was really pathetic. 6 wickets in hand. What a fucking joke.

    I think it’s a lot harder than it looks out there. We won’t know until we bowl I guess.

    I'm sure it's bloody hard, but there is no excuse for not throwing the bat in those last 3 overs. It looked like they were batting for averages there, really disappointing. We lost 4 fucking wickets total, the last with almost 4 overs to go. Pathetic to not have a real crack at the end. Fuck knows what Neesham was doing.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    It should be enough if we get a few early wickets - if we don't it probably won't.

    We're in the game.

    Allen is basically a gambit and we didn't get much value from it tonight. Sharp fielding to get Conway, which cost a few runs.

    Mitch and Kane did a good job re-building and the end wasn't terrible - we didn't get the really big over we needed.

    In the shades of '92 front, it doesn't yet appear Kane has pulled his hammy! Let's hope Inzi Jr. has forgotten his bat!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #188

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @Canes4life said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    @voodoo said in T20 World Cup NZ v PAK:

    That was really pathetic. 6 wickets in hand. What a fucking joke.

    I think it’s a lot harder than it looks out there. We won’t know until we bowl I guess.

    I'm sure it's bloody hard, but there is no excuse for not throwing the bat in those last 3 overs. It looked like they were batting for averages there, really disappointing. We lost 4 fucking wickets total, the last with almost 4 overs to go. Pathetic to not have a real crack at the end. Fuck knows what Neesham was doing.

    Once Kane hit that 6 I thought "here we go" but he didn't go on with it

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ARHS
    wrote on last edited by
    #189

    Sensible batting. Ball was moving late. Hard to hit in the air I expect. If our guys bowl as well as they can we will have the Pakistan batting under pressure. Not sure they gave too much depth in the batting order. Hope they don't prove me wrong.
    Could not believe how much sweat was dripping off Mitchell...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #190

    Guptill is on. Super sub fielder

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #191

    To add - I'm not saying we are no chance, I'm watching this through! But - we should have either scored 15 runs more or have lost 3 more wickets.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

T20 World Cup NZ v PAK
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.