• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ v Pakistan 2022/23

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
751 Posts 44 Posters 50.3k Views
NZ v Pakistan 2022/23
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #214

    I don't think there is any reason not to have a go for at least a few overs. If we lose 2-3 wickets then we can shut up shop.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #215

    Pakistan will be a bit concerned if we take 20 off the first over!

    Open with Conway and Mitchell?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #216

    @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

    Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

    But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

    Slip gone again last ball!

    For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

    What does that even mean??? Too good for what??? We can’t possibly lose the game, how does it make sense to not attack one very way possible??!!

    Shakeel was hitting our bowlers around, so why bring in the fielders around the bat, other than for them to get smashed at? The bowling wasn’t good enough plain and simple.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #217

    Bracewell to open. Hahahahahaha

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
    #218

    Done for bounce (lack of). Bracewell gone

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by canefan
    #219

    @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

    Done for bounce (lack of). Bracewell gone

    Journeyman at best. Bracewell is simply not international class

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    wrote on last edited by
    #220

    I have to say this is pretty stupid from Pakistan.

    It's very, very unlikely we will get these runs, but it's not impossible.

    Pakistan getting 10 wickets on the other hand is vanishingly unlikely.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to Damo on last edited by Chris
    #221

    @Damo said in NZ v Pakistan:

    I have to say this is pretty stupid from Pakistan.

    It's very, very unlikely we will get these runs, but it's not impossible.

    Pakistan getting 10 wickets on the other hand is vanishingly unlikely.

    I think it’s great from Pakistan ,Test Cricket needs brave decelerations,Awesome for the game.
    And great from NZ they are taking it on great watching.

    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DamoD Offline
    DamoD Offline
    Damo
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #222

    @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @Damo said in NZ v Pakistan:

    I have to say this is pretty stupid from Pakistan.

    It's very, very unlikely we will get these runs, but it's not impossible.

    Pakistan getting 10 wickets on the other hand is vanishingly unlikely.

    I think it’s great from Pakistan ,Test Cricket needs brave decelerations,Awesome for the game.
    And great from NZ they are taking it on great watching.

    What if they lose, with no real possibility of winning?

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to Damo on last edited by
    #223

    @Damo said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @Damo said in NZ v Pakistan:

    I have to say this is pretty stupid from Pakistan.

    It's very, very unlikely we will get these runs, but it's not impossible.

    Pakistan getting 10 wickets on the other hand is vanishingly unlikely.

    I think it’s great from Pakistan ,Test Cricket needs brave decelerations,Awesome for the game.
    And great from NZ they are taking it on great watching.

    What if they lose, with no real possibility of winning?

    Still brave and great for Cricket.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by Chris
    #224

    Latham is going brilliantly picking his hitting areas very well.
    Should have never opened with Bracewell he wasted 5 balls.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #225

    Looks like light is going to win this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #226

    Shame it was shaping up as a very interesting finish.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    Oh well, we had a go.

    Pakistan batsmen (lower order) saved the match after our big innings.

    They all seem to love Kane!

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #228

    @Chris I would’ve opened with Latham and Conway and then bought in Mitchell at 3.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #229

    @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

    Oh well, we had a go.

    Pakistan batsmen (lower order) saved the match after our big innings.

    They all seem to love Kane!

    Ish did great, but the rest just couldn't eke out the tail fast enough

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #230

    Pakistan batted the second innings to avoid a loss. Which meant not enough time to realise a result.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Away
    ChrisC Away
    Chris
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #231

    @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

    @Chris I would’ve opened with Latham and Conway and then bought in Mitchell at 3.

    Yep me too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    delicatessen
    wrote on last edited by
    #232

    Frustrating watch, the end of Pakistan's second innings. Bracewell was bowling an excellent line, but it was consistently way too full. Every ball could be smothered on a pitch that was offering a small amount of turn and a small amount of variable bounce.
    If he'd bowled the exact same line but on a length or slightly back of a length, we've had chances to take wickets long before we did.
    It's not so much about being so accurate that the batsmen hesitate about going forward or coming back, it's about ensuring they play off the back foot as much as possible, giving every opportunity for a variation in spin or bounce to beat the bat. On the odd occasion he misses it slightly full, it should be in that magical block hole area anyway.

    Very frustrating seeing the ball tossed to Bracewell every second over, and no one (that I saw) asking him to change a plan that clearly wasn't working.

    Others have said he's not an international cricketer. I think he has the skills to bowl in a match like this - he's accurate, turns the ball, and can vary speed pretty well - but his tactics will need a tickle-up if he's to progress.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by No Quarter
    #233

    Anyway, that's a really good performance, and only a couple of wickets away from victory. Pakistan only just hung on to save that match, which is not the outcome I was expecting going into it. Spin is not really our strength, great to see Ish getting some wickets by not overly surprised we weren't as threatening as you'd hope. Ajaz was largely ineffective which is probably the biggest disappointment given his recent success against in India, if he could have at least grabbed a couple in the 2nd innings then it would have been all on. The team can take a lot of confidence from that performance though.

    Oh, and Kane is just amazing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

NZ v Pakistan 2022/23
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.