• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

TV Serieseseses

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
13.3k Posts 133 Posters 2.2m Views
TV Serieseseses
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #11265

    Survivor

    I love watching the duplicity, especially with the changes made in the last few seasons. Season 42 is one where the cast looks like the island of misfit mascots.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by
    #11266

    Warrior Nun

    • Right, I'm pretty sure I watched this on one of you fluffybunny's recommendations
    • The bitch is annoying. From the start
    • It turns out, she got some tits. But hidden like. Chaste. Like a nun. Kinda.
    • Some of the other nuns are kinda hot, and more cleavage shown than one would expect
    • Season 2 - fuck, that bitch is annoying
    • I get that this level of "B-level action bullshit" series is going to hit the same tropes, but...
      • previously: bitch insists on an ill-thought-out-plan... literally insisting others join in...
      • later, conversation:
        • "I feel like it's all my fault..."
        • "no, fuck off, I didn't choose this..."
        • Yes. You did. You fucking literally did choose the shit you're complaining about, when you insisted on the plan that everybody fucking else objected to. Fuck off you hot big-titted pretty little bitch.
    • Not to mention the fallback Arrow-type bullshit storylines of "No, let's just run away and forget that I am a magically enabled being, and fuck off to do sapphic shit somewhere while the world burns". Which I would watch. And would have made a better S02 finale.
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #11267

    Anyone watched 1923, the following on from 1883 and probably a prequel or so prior to Yellowstone?

    Finished it last night, largely decent, but there are 3 story arcs running, and by end the 3 arcs do not merge as you would expect, 1 I have no idea how it will merge in, and the other 2 just meandered along going no where, especially when you know how things pan out cos Yellowstone.

    So I have to assume there will be a 2nd season of 1923 before they move onto 1963 or something...

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #11268

    @taniwharugby said in TV Serieseseses:

    Anyone watched 1923, the following on from 1883 and probably a prequel or so prior to Yellowstone?

    Finished it last night, largely decent, but there are 3 story arcs running, and by end the 3 arcs do not merge as you would expect, 1 I have no idea how it will merge in, and the other 2 just meandered along going no where, especially when you know how things pan out cos Yellowstone.

    So I have to assume there will be a 2nd season of 1923 before they move onto 1963 or something...

    This does not make me want to watch this. Sheridan’s stuff has a much shorter shelf life than he imagines. 1883 was good and stayed good because it had a beginning, middle and end. For sure, it offered the possibility of a follow on story but it stood up well on its own. Seems like he’s going down the route of milking it like a scouser does Hillsborough.

    taniwharugbyT MiketheSnowM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #11269

    @Catogrande yeah I had never entertained that it might be a multi season series, just assumed it would be a single seaosn like 1883, that we enjoyed, and even when the final ep was aired I was thinking there was alot to tie up in an hour, then an hour later nothing at all was tied up.

    I think a 2nd season could be good, but was just the 3 arcs didnt even get close to merging, for the one loose story, maybe I had seen more of Yellowstone I might see the link, but otherwise I cant work out what the point was.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #11270

    @taniwharugby

    I gave up on Yellowstone after S2. I just felt that there must be a limit to the number of people you can kill in spectacular fashion without anyone noticing.

    MN5M taniwharugbyT KiwiwombleK 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #11271

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @taniwharugby

    I gave up on Yellowstone after S2. I just felt that there must be a limit to the number of people you can kill in spectacular fashion without anyone noticing.

    That didn’t stop Banshee going for several seasons

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #11272

    The Last of Us

    Watched first episode

    Well made

    But isn't it just Fungi The Walking Dead?

    MN5M Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #11273

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    The Last of Us

    Watched first episode

    Well made

    But isn't it just Fungi The Walking Dead?

    It’s better

    Well actually the first seasons of the walking dead were terrific to be fair

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #11274

    @MN5 said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    The Last of Us

    Watched first episode

    Well made

    But isn't it just Fungi The Walking Dead?

    It’s better

    Well actually the first seasons of the walking dead were terrific to be fair

    Better or different?

    Or both?

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #11275

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MN5 said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    The Last of Us

    Watched first episode

    Well made

    But isn't it just Fungi The Walking Dead?

    It’s better

    Well actually the first seasons of the walking dead were terrific to be fair

    Better or different?

    Or both?

    Last of us is more of a…….”mission” as opposed to just trying to get by.

    Lots of flashbacks explaining things.

    Both excellent but TWD overstayed it’s welcome.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #11276

    @MN5 said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MN5 said in TV Serieseseses:

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    The Last of Us

    Watched first episode

    Well made

    But isn't it just Fungi The Walking Dead?

    It’s better

    Well actually the first seasons of the walking dead were terrific to be fair

    Better or different?

    Or both?

    Last of us is more of a…….”mission” as opposed to just trying to get by.

    Lots of flashbacks explaining things.

    Both excellent but TWD overstayed it’s welcome.

    Might come back to it once I've finished other shows

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #11277

    @antipodean said in TV Serieseseses:

    Survivor

    I love watching the duplicity, especially with the changes made in the last few seasons. Season 42 is one where the cast looks like the island of misfit mascots.

    Episode #5: These people must have been a deliberate casting decision. An astounding number of them would normally be the clear and obvious outlier voted off for being stupid/ incompetent/ physical liability.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #11278

    The Mrs has been watching MAFS Oz and as car crash tele I am getting drawn in.
    The premise of the show is so ridiculous. There’s a good reason these people can’t find long term partners. It’s because they are psycho narcissists.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #11279

    @Catogrande I've only done 1 sesson of Yellowstone, I'd seen the sister series of Sons of Anarchy...but as we liked 1883 thought 1923 would be great too, which it is to a point...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #11280

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @taniwharugby said in TV Serieseseses:

    Anyone watched 1923, the following on from 1883 and probably a prequel or so prior to Yellowstone?

    Finished it last night, largely decent, but there are 3 story arcs running, and by end the 3 arcs do not merge as you would expect, 1 I have no idea how it will merge in, and the other 2 just meandered along going no where, especially when you know how things pan out cos Yellowstone.

    So I have to assume there will be a 2nd season of 1923 before they move onto 1963 or something...

    This does not make me want to watch this. Sheridan’s stuff has a much shorter shelf life than he imagines. 1883 was good and stayed good because it had a beginning, middle and end. For sure, it offered the possibility of a follow on story but it stood up well on its own. Seems like he’s going down the route of milking it like a scouser does Hillsborough.

    Patience

    Loving the three arcs

    Loved the series

    Can't wait for the next one

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #11281

    @MiketheSnow said in TV Serieseseses:

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @taniwharugby said in TV Serieseseses:

    Anyone watched 1923, the following on from 1883 and probably a prequel or so prior to Yellowstone?

    Finished it last night, largely decent, but there are 3 story arcs running, and by end the 3 arcs do not merge as you would expect, 1 I have no idea how it will merge in, and the other 2 just meandered along going no where, especially when you know how things pan out cos Yellowstone.

    So I have to assume there will be a 2nd season of 1923 before they move onto 1963 or something...

    This does not make me want to watch this. Sheridan’s stuff has a much shorter shelf life than he imagines. 1883 was good and stayed good because it had a beginning, middle and end. For sure, it offered the possibility of a follow on story but it stood up well on its own. Seems like he’s going down the route of milking it like a scouser does Hillsborough.

    Patience

    Loving the three arcs

    Loved the series

    Can't wait for the next one

    Well fuck you. Now I’m conflicted.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by taniwharugby
    #11282

    @Catogrande don't get me wrong, it was a good watch, I guess I wrongly assumed it'd be a single series like 1883 which has annoyed/frustrated me, but by the same token, s2 (or 1924 cos im sure they are about to leave 1923...) could be v good too.

    CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #11283

    @taniwharugby

    Ok, between you and @MiketheSnow youve convinced me. Now I’ll have to sign up to Paramount again, binge it and then bin them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by
    #11284

    @Catogrande said in TV Serieseseses:

    @taniwharugby

    I gave up on Yellowstone after S2. I just felt that there must be a limit to the number of people you can kill in spectacular fashion without anyone noticing.

    ...just above there is a post about a secret group of warrior nuns, one of of which has magical powers and the main protagonist is an angle/demon....suspend disbelief 😉

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

TV Serieseseses
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.