Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Blues v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
373 Posts 51 Posters 20.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

    @george33 said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Crazy-Horse yes he was great at 10 just needs more time he b our blues 10 next season all goin well don't forget young Payton Spencer tho but he is currently 7s but signed up

    So you watched in person or was the game streamed?

    G Offline
    G Offline
    george33
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @Crazy-Horse watched it he will b great bit more games at 10, think u will c him this year at 10 for blues maybe force game when beauden and Stephen have a break that's my pick but jock was good to tho

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Nevorian
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      Crusaders should win in the tight five, blues dominate in the Loosies , evens in the halves and Blues in the centres and outside backs. Still should be within 8 points to blues as whenever these two meet

      number9N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nevorian

        Crusaders should win in the tight five, blues dominate in the Loosies , evens in the halves and Blues in the centres and outside backs. Still should be within 8 points to blues as whenever these two meet

        number9N Offline
        number9N Offline
        number9
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        @Nevorian said in Blues v Crusaders:

        Crusaders should win in the tight five, blues dominate in the Loosies , evens in the halves and Blues in the centres and outside backs. Still should be within 8 points to blues as whenever these two meet

        Blues will win it at the breakdown and mobility

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ChrisC Chris

          https://www.crusaders.co.nz/latest/news/squad-naming-round-four-vs-blues/

          Chris B.C Offline
          Chris B.C Offline
          Chris B.
          wrote on last edited by Chris B.
          #29

          @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

          https://www.crusaders.co.nz/latest/news/squad-naming-round-four-vs-blues/

          Is Quin Strange not available?

          I'd have been tempted to include him in the 23 and play Scott Barrett at 6 - Ethan at 8. How does Bower go at tighthead? I can't recall seeing him there, but this old article says he prefers it.

          https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/113860900/super-rugby-george-bowers-rise-from-makeshift-barber-to-crusaders-prop

          Our backs look pretty weak without Havili, Goodhue Jordan (and Hall).

          Be a good night for pissing rain and 10 man rugby!!! 🙂

          ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TimT Away
            TimT Away
            Tim
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            Both teams paying $1.92 at the TAB.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Chris B.C Chris B.

              @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

              https://www.crusaders.co.nz/latest/news/squad-naming-round-four-vs-blues/

              Is Quin Strange not available?

              I'd have been tempted to include him in the 23 and play Scott Barrett at 6 - Ethan at 8. How does Bower go at tighthead? I can't recall seeing him there, but this old article says he prefers it.

              https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/113860900/super-rugby-george-bowers-rise-from-makeshift-barber-to-crusaders-prop

              Our backs look pretty weak without Havili, Goodhue Jordan (and Hall).

              Be a good night for pissing rain and 10 man rugby!!! 🙂

              ChrisC Online
              ChrisC Online
              Chris
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              @Chris-B said in Blues v Crusaders:

              @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

              https://www.crusaders.co.nz/latest/news/squad-naming-round-four-vs-blues/

              Is Quin Strange not available?

              I'd have been tempted to include him in the 23 and play Scott Barrett at 6 - Ethan at 8. How does Bower go at tighthead? I can't recall seeing him there, but this old article says he prefers it.

              https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/113860900/super-rugby-george-bowers-rise-from-makeshift-barber-to-crusaders-prop

              Our backs look pretty weak without Havili, Goodhue Jordan (and Hall).

              Be a good night for pissing rain and 10 man rugby!!! 🙂

              Not sure about Strange,the backs look weak I agree, Burke at FB makes me nervous,he goes well at First five but looks lost at the back, And the midfield is a worry.
              Yep wet night would help us a bit.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • gt12G Offline
                gt12G Offline
                gt12
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                With those Blues tighties, I can't see them winning this game. Saders to kick to the corners and maul all night long.

                I hope I'm wrong.

                CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • DuluthD Duluth

                  https://www.blues.rugby/blues-rugby-news/team-naming-v-crusaders

                  1 Alex Hodgman
                  2 Ricky Riccitelli
                  3 James Lay
                  4 James Tucker
                  5 Cameron Suafoa
                  6 Adrian Choat
                  7 Dalton Papalii
                  8 Hoskins Sotutu
                  9 Finlay Christie
                  10 Beauden Barrett
                  11 Caleb Clarke
                  12 Roger Tuivasa-Sheck
                  13 Rieko Ioane
                  14 Mark Telea
                  15 Stephen Perofeta (50 Blues games)

                  Reserves:
                  16 Soane Vikena
                  17 Jordan Lay
                  18 Nepo Laulala
                  19 Tom Robinson
                  20 Taine Plumtree
                  21 Taufa Funaki
                  22 Bryce Heem
                  23 Zarn Sullivan

                  Players not considered: Sam Darry (knee), Joshua Fusitu’a (ribs), Akira Ioane (knee), Sam Nock (calf), Patrick Tuipulotu (knee), Ofa Tuungafasi (concussion).

                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                  ACT Crusader
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  @Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:

                  7 Dalton Papalii
                  8 Hoskins Sotutu
                  9 Finlay Christie
                  10 Beauden Barrett
                  11 Caleb Clarke
                  12 Roger Tuivasa-Sheck
                  13 Rieko Ioane
                  14 Mark Telea
                  15 Stephen Perofeta

                  An AB laden 7-15. Saders are toast

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Machpants
                    wrote on last edited by Machpants
                    #34

                    Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                    Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • M Machpants

                      Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                      Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                      CrucialC Offline
                      CrucialC Offline
                      Crucial
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                      Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                      Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                      Thank you.

                      Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                      Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                      And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                      That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                      M kiwiinmelbK 2 Replies Last reply
                      3
                      • gt12G gt12

                        With those Blues tighties, I can't see them winning this game. Saders to kick to the corners and maul all night long.

                        I hope I'm wrong.

                        CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        @gt12 said in Blues v Crusaders:

                        With those Blues tighties, I can't see them winning this game. Saders to kick to the corners and maul all night long.

                        That would depend on Blues players giving away silly penalties.........

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • CrucialC Crucial

                          @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                          Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                          Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                          Thank you.

                          Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                          Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                          And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                          That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #37

                          @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                          @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                          Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                          Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                          Thank you.

                          Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                          Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                          And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                          That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                          Yeah I was going to go there, too. Finale is just French, but grand final is ozzie tautological rubbish.

                          nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • CrucialC Crucial

                            @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                            Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                            Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                            Thank you.

                            Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                            Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                            And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                            That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                            kiwiinmelbK Offline
                            kiwiinmelbK Offline
                            kiwiinmelb
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                            @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                            Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                            Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                            Thank you.

                            Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                            Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                            And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                            That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                            ive been in australia so long I wasnt aware its an Aussie thing , its just become part of the language 🙂

                            boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • DuluthD Offline
                              DuluthD Offline
                              Duluth
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                              CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DuluthD Duluth

                                About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                                CrucialC Offline
                                CrucialC Offline
                                Crucial
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #40

                                @Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                                The story from Ryan was that a non playing lock (injured, can't remember who) was tasked with analysing the Blues lineout for the comp and working out their system.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • CrucialC Crucial

                                  @Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                  About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                                  The story from Ryan was that a non playing lock (injured, can't remember who) was tasked with analysing the Blues lineout for the comp and working out their system.

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  African Monkey
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #41

                                  @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                                  CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • A African Monkey

                                    @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    Crucial
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #42

                                    @African-Monkey said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                    @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                                    Those Cantabs are good at that subterfuge. Look how long Deans got away with undermining the Wallabies 😉

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • CrucialC Crucial

                                      @African-Monkey said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                      @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                                      Those Cantabs are good at that subterfuge. Look how long Deans got away with undermining the Wallabies 😉

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      African Monkey
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #43

                                      @Crucial And let's not forget about Romano doing his best to lose the semi for us against the Brumbies by not releasing the ball with a minute or so left. Sadly that night, Ben O'Keeffe had money on the Blues and refused to blow a penalty so his mission failed that night.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT Crusader
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #44

                                        Who’s Romano? I thought it was Romero

                                        On the lineout from last years final, I think a number of things went wrong for the Blues - hesitant throwing, poor timing on the lift. Trying to throw over instead of in front, lack of variation. And as we know once you miss a couple the yips start to settle in with the added pressure of a final.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • O Offline
                                          O Offline
                                          Old Samurai Jack
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #45

                                          You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                          Chris B.C C 2 Replies Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search