Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Blues v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
373 Posts 51 Posters 20.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Chris B.

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    https://www.crusaders.co.nz/latest/news/squad-naming-round-four-vs-blues/

    Is Quin Strange not available?

    I'd have been tempted to include him in the 23 and play Scott Barrett at 6 - Ethan at 8. How does Bower go at tighthead? I can't recall seeing him there, but this old article says he prefers it.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/113860900/super-rugby-george-bowers-rise-from-makeshift-barber-to-crusaders-prop

    Our backs look pretty weak without Havili, Goodhue Jordan (and Hall).

    Be a good night for pissing rain and 10 man rugby!!! 🙂

    ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @Chris-B said in Blues v Crusaders:

    @Chris said in Blues v Crusaders:

    https://www.crusaders.co.nz/latest/news/squad-naming-round-four-vs-blues/

    Is Quin Strange not available?

    I'd have been tempted to include him in the 23 and play Scott Barrett at 6 - Ethan at 8. How does Bower go at tighthead? I can't recall seeing him there, but this old article says he prefers it.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/113860900/super-rugby-george-bowers-rise-from-makeshift-barber-to-crusaders-prop

    Our backs look pretty weak without Havili, Goodhue Jordan (and Hall).

    Be a good night for pissing rain and 10 man rugby!!! 🙂

    Not sure about Strange,the backs look weak I agree, Burke at FB makes me nervous,he goes well at First five but looks lost at the back, And the midfield is a worry.
    Yep wet night would help us a bit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • gt12G Offline
      gt12G Offline
      gt12
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      With those Blues tighties, I can't see them winning this game. Saders to kick to the corners and maul all night long.

      I hope I'm wrong.

      CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • DuluthD Duluth

        https://www.blues.rugby/blues-rugby-news/team-naming-v-crusaders

        1 Alex Hodgman
        2 Ricky Riccitelli
        3 James Lay
        4 James Tucker
        5 Cameron Suafoa
        6 Adrian Choat
        7 Dalton Papalii
        8 Hoskins Sotutu
        9 Finlay Christie
        10 Beauden Barrett
        11 Caleb Clarke
        12 Roger Tuivasa-Sheck
        13 Rieko Ioane
        14 Mark Telea
        15 Stephen Perofeta (50 Blues games)

        Reserves:
        16 Soane Vikena
        17 Jordan Lay
        18 Nepo Laulala
        19 Tom Robinson
        20 Taine Plumtree
        21 Taufa Funaki
        22 Bryce Heem
        23 Zarn Sullivan

        Players not considered: Sam Darry (knee), Joshua Fusitu’a (ribs), Akira Ioane (knee), Sam Nock (calf), Patrick Tuipulotu (knee), Ofa Tuungafasi (concussion).

        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT Crusader
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        @Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:

        7 Dalton Papalii
        8 Hoskins Sotutu
        9 Finlay Christie
        10 Beauden Barrett
        11 Caleb Clarke
        12 Roger Tuivasa-Sheck
        13 Rieko Ioane
        14 Mark Telea
        15 Stephen Perofeta

        An AB laden 7-15. Saders are toast

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Machpants
          wrote on last edited by Machpants
          #34

          Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

          Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

          CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • M Machpants

            Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

            Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

            CrucialC Offline
            CrucialC Offline
            Crucial
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

            Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

            Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

            Thank you.

            Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

            Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

            And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

            That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

            M kiwiinmelbK 2 Replies Last reply
            3
            • gt12G gt12

              With those Blues tighties, I can't see them winning this game. Saders to kick to the corners and maul all night long.

              I hope I'm wrong.

              CrucialC Offline
              CrucialC Offline
              Crucial
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              @gt12 said in Blues v Crusaders:

              With those Blues tighties, I can't see them winning this game. Saders to kick to the corners and maul all night long.

              That would depend on Blues players giving away silly penalties.........

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CrucialC Crucial

                @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                Thank you.

                Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                Thank you.

                Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                Yeah I was going to go there, too. Finale is just French, but grand final is ozzie tautological rubbish.

                nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • CrucialC Crucial

                  @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                  Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                  Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                  Thank you.

                  Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                  Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                  And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                  That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                  kiwiinmelbK Offline
                  kiwiinmelbK Offline
                  kiwiinmelb
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                  @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                  Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                  Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                  Thank you.

                  Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                  Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                  And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                  That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                  ive been in australia so long I wasnt aware its an Aussie thing , its just become part of the language 🙂

                  boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DuluthD Offline
                    DuluthD Offline
                    Duluth
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • DuluthD Duluth

                      About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                      CrucialC Offline
                      CrucialC Offline
                      Crucial
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      @Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:

                      About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                      The story from Ryan was that a non playing lock (injured, can't remember who) was tasked with analysing the Blues lineout for the comp and working out their system.

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • CrucialC Crucial

                        @Duluth said in Blues v Crusaders:

                        About that grand final, I wonder if Romano was using a similar lineout calling system to his previous team? The throwing went off as the game went on but I thought the Crusaders knew where the ball was going from the start

                        The story from Ryan was that a non playing lock (injured, can't remember who) was tasked with analysing the Blues lineout for the comp and working out their system.

                        A Online
                        A Online
                        African Monkey
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #41

                        @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                        CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • A African Monkey

                          @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                          CrucialC Offline
                          CrucialC Offline
                          Crucial
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #42

                          @African-Monkey said in Blues v Crusaders:

                          @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                          Those Cantabs are good at that subterfuge. Look how long Deans got away with undermining the Wallabies 😉

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • CrucialC Crucial

                            @African-Monkey said in Blues v Crusaders:

                            @Crucial I think the real story was that Luke Romano was sent to the Blues as a mole to leak the line out calls to the Crusaders come 'grand final' time......

                            Those Cantabs are good at that subterfuge. Look how long Deans got away with undermining the Wallabies 😉

                            A Online
                            A Online
                            African Monkey
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #43

                            @Crucial And let's not forget about Romano doing his best to lose the semi for us against the Brumbies by not releasing the ball with a minute or so left. Sadly that night, Ben O'Keeffe had money on the Blues and refused to blow a penalty so his mission failed that night.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • ACT CrusaderA Offline
                              ACT CrusaderA Offline
                              ACT Crusader
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #44

                              Who’s Romano? I thought it was Romero

                              On the lineout from last years final, I think a number of things went wrong for the Blues - hesitant throwing, poor timing on the lift. Trying to throw over instead of in front, lack of variation. And as we know once you miss a couple the yips start to settle in with the added pressure of a final.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • O Online
                                O Online
                                Old Samurai Jack
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #45

                                You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                Chris B.C C 2 Replies Last reply
                                4
                                • O Old Samurai Jack

                                  You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                  Chris B.C Offline
                                  Chris B.C Offline
                                  Chris B.
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #46

                                  @Old-Samurai-Jack Yeah - tough one to call. Both teams pretty compromised.

                                  Unfortunately, it's almost certainly going to be a fine night, which makes it harder to starve the Blues backs.

                                  McLeod, Ennor and Burke need to have big games.

                                  Not a good look for Fihaki not making the 23 for this game.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • O Old Samurai Jack

                                    You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    cgrant
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #47

                                    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                    You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                    The forwards make it possible to win a game. The backs decide by how much.

                                    O 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Machpants

                                      @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                      @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                      Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                                      Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                                      Thank you.

                                      Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                                      Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                                      And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                                      That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                                      Yeah I was going to go there, too. Finale is just French, but grand final is ozzie tautological rubbish.

                                      nostrildamusN Offline
                                      nostrildamusN Offline
                                      nostrildamus
                                      wrote on last edited by nostrildamus
                                      #48

                                      @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                      ozzie tautological rubbish.

                                      I am not sure if you said the same thing twice or the same thing thrice.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • C cgrant

                                        @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                        You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                        The forwards make it possible to win a game. The backs decide by how much.

                                        O Online
                                        O Online
                                        Old Samurai Jack
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #49

                                        @cgrant said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                        @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                        You look at the tight five and think, wow the Crusaders by a thousand....then you look at the backs and think, wow Blues by a thousand! Interesting game!

                                        The forwards make it possible to win a game. The backs decide by how much.

                                        What's your claim then?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

                                          @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                          @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                          Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                                          Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                                          Thank you.

                                          Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                                          Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                                          And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                                          That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                                          ive been in australia so long I wasnt aware its an Aussie thing , its just become part of the language 🙂

                                          boobooB Offline
                                          boobooB Offline
                                          booboo
                                          wrote on last edited by booboo
                                          #50

                                          @kiwiinmelb said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                          @Crucial said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                          @Machpants said in Blues v Crusaders:

                                          Seems to be lots of talk about last years GF, is that girl friend, gluten free? Dunno.

                                          Anyway what is interesting is this game is a repeat of last year's final, surprised no one has pointed that out yet

                                          Thank you.

                                          Can't stand that Aussie thing of Final/Grand Final.

                                          Final means final. Not decide who plays next week.

                                          And then there's the stupidity of 'Finale'.

                                          That reminds me. The GOM thread needs some new additions.....

                                          ive been in australia Stockholm so long I wasnt aware its an Aussie thing , its just become part of the language 🙂

                                          FIFY

                                          nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search