Chiefs v Crusaders
-
@antipodean
Yes he is. His brother isn't -
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
-
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
..or enter through the gate
SR this year is very lenient about what the attacking team is allowed to do. It’s not just this ref.
-
@barky1 who is your 13 then?
-
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
..or enter through the gate
SR this year is very lenient about what the attacking team is allowed to do. It’s not just this ref.
@Duluth said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
..or enter through the gate
SR this year is very lenient about what the attacking team is allowed to do. It’s not just this ref.
Not just me then
RWC is going to be interesting
-
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
you are still not a fan of RM, right? What did you think of DMac?
-
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
you are still not a fan of RM, right? What did you think of DMac?
@nostrildamus said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
you are still not a fan of RM, right? What did you think of DMac?
RM in pole I would guess as incumbent
Think they're on par now
Depends on the game plan as to whom is chosen
But these are your 10s for the RWC
-
Crusaders really need to go hunting for a new 9. Hall was pretty decent and much better than Drummond.
Thought Goodhue looked decent.
Good last 15 from chiefs. McKenzie is deadly with half a gap.
-
How good is it these players stay so long after the game to engage with fans and sign autographs etc.
-
That would have been the first sellout in ten years?
Was pleasing to see the fair weather support. Be a few buckos in the coffers. -
I’ve never been less confident about NZs RWC chances. But if we want any chance McKenzie is the only option at 10.
@Billy-Tell said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
I’ve never been less confident about NZs RWC chances. But if we want any chance McKenzie is the only option at 10.
Yeah I’m not overly confident he is the answer at test level but am willing to go along with it to find out .
-
Says a fucking lot about RM that people are diving into the DM at 10 camp after that performance
Did he get better in the 2nd half? Sure.
But at test level you don’t generally get the chance to make up for the 27 stupid fuckups you made in the 1st half.
-
Says a fucking lot about RM that people are diving into the DM at 10 camp after that performance
Did he get better in the 2nd half? Sure.
But at test level you don’t generally get the chance to make up for the 27 stupid fuckups you made in the 1st half.
-
@voodoo Yep. I am not sure how good we are at 10 really. DMac is good in certain situations but a liability in others.
